r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[All] except covered in other channels

Anton
4-Jan-2005
[254x4]
err... I think not all... because I was missing a file winmm.lib 
(which I found in masm32 distribution), and mmreg.h (which I found 
on the web, though don't know if if was right version)
It has *some* windows stuff, obviously, in order to create a windows 
DLL, it uses windows.h...
mmmm... I don't think I have another way... I really do need to compile 
it, one way or another..
created "Windows (MS)" group -> let's go there...
DideC
4-Jan-2005
[258]
Winmm.dll is the MCI interface in Windows. With that interface you 
can control many multimedia stuff (wave form playing, video playing, 
recording...)

It has two interface : C++ level and string command. The last one 
sounds easy to interface with view/pro. But, eh, I never played with 
DLL interfacing in rebol.
So I let that to "make routine!" guru ;-)
Pekr
4-Jan-2005
[259]
So, what is the latest version of make-doc ppl do use? I can see 
nice output done by Chris, but Gabriele's YourValues html looks nice 
too .. anyone?
Gabriele
4-Jan-2005
[260]
mine is actually Chris' one
Pekr
4-Jan-2005
[261]
do you use his on-line formatter or is anywhere source availalble?
Gabriele
4-Jan-2005
[262]
online
Pekr
4-Jan-2005
[263]
I downloaded make-doc.r from rebol.org, I know there is also make-doc2 
which RT uses, but I wonder if it is publicly available? I would 
like to know, how safe I am using Robert's make-doc-pro, as there 
seems to be project regarding make-doc at rebol.net, but dunno status, 
progress ...
eFishAnt
4-Jan-2005
[264]
Pekr, they will all be pretty consistent, so you shouldn't have to 
worry too much.
[unknown: 9]
4-Jan-2005
[265x2]
If anyone has any requests as to how I'm putting together the name 
of dividers, or where I put stuff, speak up.  I try to get things 
organized, so that I have some clue when I pop in here what a given 
group refers to.
Like Vanilla.  Just having it under a diviver that says Products 
helps a lot.
Brock
4-Jan-2005
[267]
funny in a 'geek' way... http://khason.biz/blog/2004/12/why-microsoft-can-blow-off-with-c.html
Pekr
4-Jan-2005
[268]
I can imagine following kind of UI being done with View ... except 
video and audio playback for now ...  http://www.mythtv.org/modules.php?name=MythFeatures
DideC
4-Jan-2005
[269]
Carl ! Your beard is required NOW !!!
Chris
4-Jan-2005
[270]
Petr, that should be doable -- though it depends whether anyone has 
reason or motivation to implement it...
Vincent
4-Jan-2005
[271]
I'm working on a sound library, for /Core and /View, with - for now 
- AIFF / 8SVX / AU / WAVE (PCM/float/u-law/A-law) support (read and 
write). Any suggestion for another usefull format to support?
Graham
4-Jan-2005
[272]
mp3 :)
eFishAnt
4-Jan-2005
[273x2]
CELP, QCELP, ... ;-)
EVRC
Pekr
4-Jan-2005
[275x2]
Vincent: http://www.fmod.orgwas suggested by Cyphre, but we don't 
know if RT would add it. But who knows, - we now have AGG :-)
Has anyone used UML in real-life. Or even more precise - is UML worth 
studying? I want to construct some system, which will have some object 
model, inheritance, classes, but dunno if UML is worth studying as 
reference. I have read few chapters - seems like cool thing, but 
a bit difficult to swallow - too many terms etc. ....
eFishAnt
4-Jan-2005
[277]
REBOL cuts out the bureacracy of UML and implements direct.  Schler-Mellor 
and Grady Brooch have some "noble" goals (but the devil's in the 
implementation), but have never faced anything as powerful as REBOL 
yet for implementation.  I saw Mellor talk once, and he did a great 
talk on "orthogonal behavior" which is apropos.  I think the way 
to utilize their mess is to do it simpler in REBOL, call it UMLR 
and teach them the future.
Pekr
4-Jan-2005
[278x3]
:-) ... yes, I can see your point ...
I will soon now post some doc(s) for brainstorming - well, maybe 
not docs, just a brainstorming itself ... I need to find myself and 
categorise my thoughts and need help on that ... of course I am studying 
various workflow, business process papers etc ...
so far it seems to be that if I want to be really abstract enough, 
I need such complex things as UML ....
eFishAnt
4-Jan-2005
[281]
nah, just dialects
Pekr
4-Jan-2005
[282]
... but maybe just because UML is here for real object oriented languages 
like Java, and once we use Rebol, we don't need such beurocracy to 
express relations ...
eFishAnt
4-Jan-2005
[283x2]
you need to define the lexicon of workflow.  keep it simple, and 
follow the flow
the discipline Carl uses to determine each word that REBOL uses...that 
is his UML.
Vincent
4-Jan-2005
[285]
CELP, QCELP, EVRC: found specifications...  awfull complexe specifications 
: O  - (but the QCP file format is quite simple)
eFishAnt
4-Jan-2005
[286x5]
He told us at Devcon that the most time he spends is selecting the 
exact right word to use in REBOL.
(Vincent...I have the CD's from TIA EIA... with sample C code...and 
some other code as well...;-)
EVRC 8k gives almost the same quality of voice as QCELP 13k, thus 
in USA, for CDMA, EVRC is used to increase voice call capacity.
if you are in Europe, then the GSM standards might be most useful 
to you, and I would have to look them up.
(supporting the standards used in VoIP would also be good)
Vincent
4-Jan-2005
[291x2]
eFishAnt:  sources will help - I'll give it a try
sound:// need streaming capabilities, for both music and VoIP
eFishAnt
4-Jan-2005
[293x3]
yes
I put sound into show.r ... '-)
oh, I have a tic in my eye
Tomc
4-Jan-2005
[296]
ant-tics ... yes that makes sense
eFishAnt
4-Jan-2005
[297]
0-o-o<
Chris
4-Jan-2005
[298]
Ogg Vorbis...
Vincent
4-Jan-2005
[299]
My priorities for sound library is to have at least support to common 
uncompressed formats r/w, then least cpu-intensive compression schemes 
r/w
Geomol
4-Jan-2005
[300]
Are REBOL/SDK issues also discussed in any of these groups?
Alan
4-Jan-2005
[301]
Geomol:you can make a sdk group under the Rebol group
Geomol
4-Jan-2005
[302x2]
Ok, I may do that.
Just reading around and getting up-to-date... I found RAMBO. I send 
a bug report with the "Feedback" thing on RT's homepage. Should I 
post it again with RAMBO? Maybe I'll get better response?