r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group

Kaj
24-Apr-2011
[2592]
Does that have a configuration file, or how often does it adjust?
Andreas
24-Apr-2011
[2593x6]
(so the full cmdline would be: msntp -x -v -a ntp1.nl.net)
that estimates clock drift and adapts accordingly
but does not check more often than every 5 hours
yikes, ignore the -v
msntp -x -a ntp1.nl.net
or "msntp -x 1440 -a ntp1.nl.net" to have it check no more than once 
daily
Kaj
24-Apr-2011
[2599]
Hm, that didn't go down too well. Or actually, it did, because the 
server won't restart
Andreas
24-Apr-2011
[2600]
msntp -x won't detach on it's own, so you'll have to use & or whatever 
your shell's (or startup script runner's) mechanism for backgrounding 
processes is
Kaj
24-Apr-2011
[2601x3]
Yeah, I'm finding out
Cool, it runs now
Thanks, that's one item off my roadmap
Andreas
24-Apr-2011
[2604]
you're welcome
Kaj
24-Apr-2011
[2605]
The broader roadmap is to switch to SystemD. Then I can reclaim the 
memory that the msntp server takes
Andreas
24-Apr-2011
[2606]
a meager ~800kB in this case :)
Kaj
24-Apr-2011
[2607x2]
Yes, but a bit much for just looking at the clock every five hours
Fossil serves distributed versioned databases and it only has 500 
KB resident right now
onetom
24-Apr-2011
[2609]
what's wrong w the cron approach then. it would take up that 800kb 
for a fraction of a second every 5hr
Kaj
24-Apr-2011
[2610]
SystemD is more advanced
onetom
24-Apr-2011
[2611]
On high holidays you may also spell it sØst‘md.
 :) the author seems to be pretty restrictive about the spelling
Kaj
24-Apr-2011
[2612]
:-)
onetom
24-Apr-2011
[2613]
http://www.fm.tul.cz/~ladislav/rebol/nistclock.r

we have this script too. would it be hard to port the system/schemes/daytime 
to r3?
GrahamC
24-Apr-2011
[2614x2]
onetom - see https://github.com/gchiu/Rebol3/blob/master/protocols/prot-daytime.r
I think for daytime all you need to do is open a port on 13, read 
what is returned and close the port.
onetom
25-Apr-2011
[2616]
indeed, thx GrahamC

$ nc time-a.nist.gov 13

55676 11-04-25 16:30:36 50 0 0 433.9 UTC(NIST) *
Kaj
23-May-2011
[2617]
Robert, you could do your presentation along the lines of my Boron 
presentation?
Robert
23-May-2011
[2618]
Good idea, do you have a link?
Kaj
23-May-2011
[2619]
http://tryrebol.esperconsultancy.nl/Boron/
Geomol
24-May-2011
[2620]
Show them HELP (?) and SOURCE, which are strong tools to get you 
going as a programmer.
Pekr
24-May-2011
[2621]
As for R3 console, which is ugly, but has some helpfull features 
too:

 Chat - open DevBase developer forum/BBS
 Docs - open DocBase document wiki (web)
 Bugs - open CureCode bug database (web)
 Demo - run demo launcher (from rebol.com)
 Help - show built-in help information
 Upgrade - check for newer releases
 Changes - what's new about this version (web)
Geomol
24-May-2011
[2622]
And how to build sentences from words and values without irritating 
syntax to get in the way.

The benefit from having so many datatypes, which make functions work 
in many ways depending on argument datatype. One good example, I 
think, is READ, but you can probably find others.
Pekr
24-May-2011
[2623x2]
e.g. I always welcome the ability to check the changelog - nice addition 
with Changes.
Also:

>> 1 / 0
** Math error: attempt to divide by zero
** Where: /
** Near: / 0

>> why?
Opening web browser...
Geomol
24-May-2011
[2625]
Is it really a good idea to go deep into R3, with the situation?
Pekr
24-May-2011
[2626]
probably not, but why not outline the planned future? R3 is alpha, 
and it should be treated as such. R3 adds nice stuff - unicode, modules, 
control of boot sequence, devices, codecs, etc. Robert might face 
the questions of recent REBOL status anyway ....
Oldes
24-May-2011
[2627]
is there any future? Maybe postapocalyptic world where the only way 
how to comunicate is face to face or using ham radios.
Geomol
24-May-2011
[2628]
REBOL has fostered ideas in many people, and I'm sure, whose ideas 
will evolve into a future with better programming tools, than the 
world has today. So yes, I'll say there is a future.
Robert
24-May-2011
[2629]
I only have 6:40 mintues. So, I concentrate on REBOL as a language, 
not so much on R3 / R2 the products.
Kaj
24-May-2011
[2630]
Devices, codecs? Where?
Pekr
24-May-2011
[2631]
They are there, just not finished and optimal ...
Kaj
24-May-2011
[2632x3]
Where?
There are just some traces of them as an internal implementation 
detail. There's nothing you can do with them
There are reasons that you don't see anybody writing extra devices 
and codecs
Pekr
24-May-2011
[2635]
Kaj - I think  that you are not accurate, and that you even know 
it?. Codecs are useless, and even Carl later introduced the plan,of 
how to reimplement them. But devices? There is list of devices out 
there, no? http://www.rebol.net/wiki/DevicesThe other fact is, that 
those are not usable via extensions, but it does not mean the abstraction 
is not there?
Kaj
24-May-2011
[2636]
Yes, they're there, as an implementation detail of the internal abstraction 
of R3. The only place where some devices are exported is in the host 
kit, but they're hardwired there. You can port those specific devices 
to other platforms, but other than that, there's nothing you can 
do with the abstraction
james_nak
24-May-2011
[2637]
Robert, code, including gui's,  created by other code and then executed, 
is a great feature of Rebol.
Dockimbel
24-May-2011
[2638x2]
Robert: here is a proposition for presenting View + VID + REBOL coding:


1) Show this code on a slide, explain briefly what it does and run 
it: 
REBOL []

view layout [
	code: area 300x200
	btn "Run" [view/new layout load code/text]
]


2) Enter some VID code in the textarea, click Run and listen to the 
"wow" in the audience ;-)

You can type, for example:

across
text "Name:" f: field
btn "Say" [alert join "Hello " f/text]
BTW, you might want to patch the 'button VID style to point to 'btn 
for this demo. "button" would be much better for the code demo, but 
the look of "btn" is way nicer (and more modern).
Maxim
24-May-2011
[2640]
also, go to nick's page to get VERY cool 5-10 line scripts which 
are impressive.
Robert
24-May-2011
[2641]
Thx for the input, I'm going to see how to put all aspects into it.