r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!AltME] Discussion about AltME

BrianH
27-Jul-2010
[4660x3]
AltME is a tiny program that doesn't handle any file extensions. 
It should be installing under C:\Users\Brian\AppData\Local (for the 
Brian user, i.e.). You can get that value from the "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Shell 
Folders" key, in the "Local AppData" value.
That will work on any version of Windows starting with 2000, and 
possibly earlier.
Personally, I run AltME as a portable app, but if I ran it as a local 
app that is where I would put it. Chrome installs in the same location 
too.
Carl
27-Jul-2010
[4663x3]
To clarify: AltME attempts to install in %appdata% (which is the 
path indicated above by BrianH.) It then uses "local" not "roaming".
However, for a "reinstall" vs a "fresh install" it will try to use 
your older installed location. That's why the above happened.
I suppose that this feature should be "removed" -- what do you think?
Maxim
27-Jul-2010
[4666]
what feature?  the reinstall?
Carl
27-Jul-2010
[4667]
Reinstall using the prior location rather than the appdata location.
Maxim
27-Jul-2010
[4668]
you could copy the files to the new installation path. on people 
with slow or buggy connections, this will make a huge impact.
Carl
27-Jul-2010
[4669]
Yes... I was thinking of doing that.
Maxim
27-Jul-2010
[4670]
that would be the best solution. it makes Altme windows compliant, 
from that point on.
Carl
27-Jul-2010
[4671x2]
I wonder if Vista/Sys7 will complain if we copy files (read access) 
out of that dir?
(I don't use Vista or Sys7, and plan never to do so.)
Maxim
27-Jul-2010
[4673]
It shoudn't complain, AFAIK.
Carl
27-Jul-2010
[4674x2]
Strange. The "reinstall" method is commented out. It would only use 
PF dir if appdata var has no value.

Sunanda, what OS are you running?
Whoops, sorry, no. Wrong version. Ignore last msg.
Sunanda
27-Jul-2010
[4676]
If you are fixing the Windows Virtual Store problem (which is a Windows 
problem that AltME is a victim of) then a little bit of inconvenience 
to fix it is acceptable -- at least to me.

Interestingly, it looks to me like this world got resynced, but the 
other worlds I look at regularly (eg REBOL-gate) did not....So perhaps 
the resync was an artefact of the upgrade; and it did not affect 
worlds opened after the upgrade was complete.
Carl
27-Jul-2010
[4677]
Yes, it needs to be fixed. Too many users having problems.

Odd problem... that resync for this world.
BrianH
27-Jul-2010
[4678]
Carl, you should also try running AltME in XP or 2000 as a regular 
user (not "Power User" or admin), without making any changes to the 
permissions of the AltME directory. Oh, and your %appdata% to local 
trick won't work on XP or 2000 because the naming convention for 
the directories is different. The registry method works for all Windows 
2000+ though.
Carl
27-Jul-2010
[4679x2]
We normally test with regular user (Cindy's task.)

%appdata% works on XP.  Perhaps added to an SP?


This release should do the right thing. Even if you installed earlier 
in PF, it will try to move it, unless you opt not to.

www.altme.com/download/altme26e.exe
You will need to reinstall with it, or run with +i on command line 
to force reinstall.
Carl
28-Jul-2010
[4681]
Checking in. I guess it works ok?
Sunanda
28-Jul-2010
[4682]
Other than the install issue, it's working well for me.
Sunanda
29-Jul-2010
[4683]
Another oddity.....I just entered this world after rekeying my username 
and password (rather than taking the usual on-screen saved values).

That seems to have triggered a resync of the checklists. No idea 
if it updated any, just that it checked them all for updates.
Andreas
10-Aug-2010
[4684x2]
Total message count over all groups of this world (or at least those 
I have %.set files for), per year:
  51628 2005
  46135 2006
  44907 2007
  34882 2008
  61481 2009
  39180 2010
Script used:

$ rebol -qs --do 'foreach f remove-each f read d: %worlds/rebol3/chat/ 
[not %.set = suffix? f] [foreach r next load/all join d f [print 
r/2/year]] q' | sort | uniq -c
AdrianS
17-Aug-2010
[4686]
Is there a way to be notified of a private chat message on AltME 
in a more intrusive way than just turning the user name red? I usually 
have the All Users section collapsed because I want the groups to 
be front and foremost so I don't notice new private messages unless 
I expand the users section. I just noticed now that I had some messages 
from Graham and Ladislav from July. Sorry guys, didn't mean to ignore 
you - just didn't notice.
Henrik
17-Aug-2010
[4687]
For me, the All Users title bar turns red and I have it at the top, 
so that's how I notice when I have private messages, even if the 
list is collapsed.
Pekr
17-Aug-2010
[4688]
well, it is sufficient for me the way you described it. When I sync, 
when I see "All users" in red, I go there first, to see private messages 
... hmm, maybe I am still waiting, when one day, I will see the private 
message from Carl, informing me, that Google, Microsoft, IBM just 
agreed to use REBOL as their primary dev. tool, and that Google bought 
Amiga for him, and that new Amiga is about to be launched, with REBOL 
based OS :-D
Henrik
17-Aug-2010
[4689]
For me a more realistic expectation is to have right-click-to-copy-text 
working more than once.
AdrianS
17-Aug-2010
[4690]
can one of you send me a test ping? - maybe I'm just blind and didn't 
notice the header turning red
Henrik
17-Aug-2010
[4691]
also I sort by activity rather than users. that helps too.
AdrianS
17-Aug-2010
[4692]
thanks - I'm blind - I'll have to be more observant
Reichart
17-Aug-2010
[4693]
You could, technically, write a few lines of REBOL that looks for 
changes in the Chat files (there is one for each group), and pop 
up a requester on your screen.
Henrik
17-Aug-2010
[4694x2]
Perhaps it would be interesting if AltME could run a script on every 
new message.
The input would be user, timestamp and message. Then you can do what 
you want with that information.
Robert
17-Aug-2010
[4696]
AltMe is missing a read-only role for some groups. This would make 
it possible to make "private" groups and let others monitor it.
Sunanda
17-Aug-2010
[4697x2]
Nice idea Henrik -- I could definitely use that ability.
Nice idea Robert.....we could (partially) fake that by having private 
groups that are [web-public]  -- they'd show up on REBOL.org's public 
archive.

[Right now, those settings would not cause the group to be published, 
but we could tweak that]
Reichart
17-Aug-2010
[4699]
Indeed, a few "little" tweaks would make AltME much better for these 
refined needs.  Perhaps one day.  But, we can make do with what we 
have too...
Brock
17-Aug-2010
[4700x2]
Adrian, two suggestions.  Make sure to use the WorldMasters Dividers, 
then also make sure to show Newest Messages first (as suggested by 
Henrik).  Both can be selected by clicking the wrench icon in the 
top right of the user list.  If you make a habit of minimizing all 
dividers, you will always see the dividers that have last received 
an update.
When a divider turns red, you open it.  Then the latest updated groups 
will display at the top of the opened divider.  You can't miss an 
update this way.
AdrianS
17-Aug-2010
[4702]
Thanks Brock - I did have them sorted that way, but I guess I just 
didn't notice the collapsed user section even though it was red - 
since I hardly ever get direct messages, I need more than the color 
change to get me to notice. Maybe some flashing and beeping :-)
Robert
18-Aug-2010
[4703]
Can we setup a "Cross-Check" group to cross-check for stuff that 
others might have done before starting on ones own?
Gregg
18-Aug-2010
[4704]
That sounds like a good idea to me.
Reichart
18-Aug-2010
[4705]
Although, isn't that dead on for what "chat" or any default group 
would be for in this world?
Gregg
18-Aug-2010
[4706x2]
Couldn't most of what we do here fall under Chat? I see it as a cross 
between a Wanted group and Amazon's Mechanical Turk. :-)
Chat is less technically oriented to me.
Reichart
18-Aug-2010
[4708]
True, just saying, if you ask a question, it will get answered.
Graham
19-Aug-2010
[4709]
The typing area shows what is being posted ... and goes gray