World: r3wp

Also, I have the file being served as a torrent on my PC .. I've 
not seen a single torrent client access it.

I don't have statistics yet, but Server must have been downloaded 
a number of hundred times now. Desktop has had up to ten thousand 
downloads per version, of the installation CD. Plus a similar number 
for the live CDs, plus about half that for the VMware images. Server 
is twice as big, and will have far more downloads when we get the 
graphical environment on it

Coming year will be our breakthrough year. At some point, we will 
be published in a big place, and the downloads will boom. And they're 
directly linked to my credit card, not yours

Giving away each Desktop costs us about a dollarcent now, Server 
is closer to two cents. This will only grow in the future

I might add that we're taking these costs for the sake of REBOL. 
There are many places who will host open source software as sponsors, 
and our Desktop installation CDs are still on SourceForge, but we 
can't do that with Syllable Server, because REBOL/Core is included

Syllable is entirely open source, except for REBOL. Once we port 
R3 to Syllable Desktop, we will have to pay for the hosting of Desktop 
ourselves, too

If you have a livePC as you did before, moka5 will host it for free.

Sure, but how about all the other form factors?

We've gone through a series of hosters, and it's a pain. We're consolidating 
on S3 now

I just checked my vmware appliance that does my torrents and I see 
the Syllable server now has 5 seeds, and my share ratio went up from 
0 to .5 now!

Do you have the BitTorrent ports on your firewall forwarded to that 
appliance? If not, you'll get a much smaller share of downloaders

If download violume is a problem for Syllable, could you find some 
people to mirror?

Nah, it's too much hassle, and we want the download statistics

Mirroring is automatic when people use BitTorrent, and we still get 
the statistics

Once the downloads go through the roof, we'll probably put up Google 
ads to balance the costs

That would work out, because our system downloads are still much 
smaller than the average Linux system

where do you get your stats from ? Directly from S3?

Yes. Have to write some analysis scripts - hopefully in ORCA

Is WLan stuff supported?

I think you could position Syllable with two major values:

1. Do you want to surf secure? Use Syllable, no virus etc will work

2. Do you want to avoid observation? Use Syllable, no root-kit etc. 
will work.

As goverments are moving to 1984 style, these two aspects will become 
more and more important.

Server now uses the Linux 2.6.22.1 kernel, so it has the new DeviceScape 
wireless stack

I haven't integrated the userspace tools yet, though; that's planned 
for the second release. I don't know yet how easy it will be then 
to configure wireless, without graphical tools

We definitely want to be something like "the Apple of open source". 
And unlike Apple, freedom is very important, too ;-)

The second Syllable newsletter has interviews with me about Syllable 
Server and our new website, so you can read a bit about our platform 
strategy and how we use REBOL in it:

http://osnews.com/story.php/18911/Syllable-Newsletter-Issue-2-Published

Here's the Syllable group.

thanks

have you got the ap from carl so you wil be ready to port R3 when 
its ready.

ap=api

I'm just now getting into closer contact

Do you mean the specs? They're not much use right now. We need code, 
as simple as that

I doubt there are any porting specs, because little work has been 
done on it yet

The porting API of R3 isn't quite settled yet, and the library would 
have to be compiled for Syllable. Not a big problem.

There is a chance that we could even use the Linux library to begin 
with. Syllable is that compatible

As I understand it the library is a sort of a "VM" and you need to 
write an interpeter for the platform.

And I thought I read that it was ported to mac os X so the specs 
for the interpreter must be there

Hm

Whatever it is, we should be able to use most of the Linux code when 
it's there

Nope. The library is a shared library like a .so or .dll, and later 
statically linked like a .o or .lib.

It is not a VM.

I'm using the wrong terms I guess...but this method of inking it 
must be known by now?

The method, yes. The api and specs, still in process.

gottcha!

They're the two standard methods of providing libraries. Principally, 
they should be Syllable libraries, but we're so much using the same 
toolchain that we can sometimes use Linux libraries directly

I'll just have to try it

Back to syllable...what niche are you looking to fill that is not 
served by ms or linux or mac stc.

A native Syllable library would be better public relations :)

Of course

Ehm, the world domination niche? ;-)