World: r3wp
[Linux] group for linux REBOL users
older newer | first last |
btiffin 9-May-2007 [1504x2] | Wine with the ies4Linux package (don't know which one did this) installs the msttcorefont package. Arial, Courier, I'll forget some, Verdana, Times, Times New, Comic Sans, Trebuchet, Impact, Georgia, Webdings, I cheated and looked, Andale. TT fonts are not redistributable but the package pulls them from... somewhere, I wasn't really watching. Management of fonts is still very distro specific. Progress is being made, but, the situation is still kinda hairy. I have to admit, compared to 4 years ago, fonts are now beautiful on Debian, but limited. And we have no TEXT in DRAW blocks...yet. :( A lot of the nicer fonts come with installing LaTeX. |
I don't know if it's because X fonts have historically sucked...but I stick with Serif, Sans, and Mono. All very legible nowadays. With LaTeX, I just let it do its thing and it always looks book quality, so I don't fiddle. | |
Graham 27-May-2007 [1506] | Currently installing 64 bit version of Suse 10 .. hope Rebol runs! |
PeterWood 27-May-2007 [1507] | Did you see Tim Johnson's recent messages on the ML? |
Graham 27-May-2007 [1508x2] | Yes! |
I'll ask him to patch my binary for me :) | |
PeterWood 27-May-2007 [1510] | Sounds painful but you know much more about such surgical procedures than I'll ever want to know ;-) |
Anton 1-Jun-2007 [1511x2] | Built a Kubuntu machine for my flatmate. Pretty painless install, I have to say. There are some issues with the all-in-one motherboard though, like inbuilt audio and ethernet chipsets are not detected, apparently. Fixed ethernet by plugging in an old network card. |
I'll probably fix audio by buying an audio card. | |
Graham 1-Jun-2007 [1513x2] | Or wait long enough for new drivers to be written |
for this chipset | |
Anton 1-Jun-2007 [1515x2] | Actually, I found two old audio cards that should work. Waiting is not an option for my flatmate :) |
The DRM stuff is starting to bite. I'm reading more about difficulties getting digital output. | |
Pekr 13-Jun-2007 [1517] | I would like you to suggest me some Linux distribution: Current situation: I run old Fedora Core 1 linux, so it lacks on security updates. The server is used for few domains, it runs apache, old mySQL 3.5.x version, glftpd, sendmail (I am used to that). Server has 2 hads. Content of server is packed each week via script and copied to other disk. Objectives: - need some easy distro, graphical mode installation, which even monkey can configure, forget somo guru stuff, target hardening, etc. - need mysql 5.x family, Apache 2. family - adding new users/developers by some tool, e.g. webmin - ftp, apache domain, webmail (squirrel) - needs to run rebol in cgi mode, eventual sqlite library compatibility welcomed - kind of easy recovery - install from CD in graphical mode, copy configs, reboot, or even better - instasll some kind of loader, map to second hd, unpack backup, reboot. Maybe this could be automated? Of course I have some sympathies already - stay with Fedora? Try Ubuntu server edition? Any other suggestion? Thanks. |
Ted 13-Jun-2007 [1518] | Obviously, Ubuntu has popular momentum, but if you want to stick with a Red Hat based distibution, CentOS is a good choice -- http://www.centos.org/. According to DistroWatch, "CentOS is 100% compatible rebuild of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux, in full compliance with Red Hat's redistribution requirements. CentOS is for people who need an enterprise class operating system stability without the cost of certification and support." |
Kaj 14-Jun-2007 [1519x2] | How can one ever get used to sendmail? :-) |
The SME Server at contribs.org is based on Red Hat and heavily customized to run almost all functions you mention with particularly easy user management. Don't know how current is is on Apache and MySQL. As long as you don't need /View it's OK, because it comes without X11 | |
Pekr 15-Jun-2007 [1521x3] | I looked into CentOS, but I already downloaded Ubuntu server to give it a try. This time I will install including X-Windows, and also run webmin. My initial idea was to have a small distro, which could be recovered very quickly, but I think that I am fine with one day off .... |
anyway - it would be cool to have really small thingy, which is able to do webserving, proxy (eventually), sendmail .... well, as for webserving purposes, I can imagine very small distro, with just cheyenne and rebol :-) | |
I don't care about the firewall too much, because I don't want my server to do it at all - that is what is router and DMZ for. | |
DaveC 15-Jun-2007 [1524] | Another SME type distro is Clarkconnect (http://www.clarkconnect.com). It's RHEL based and has community and paid services. Nice web admin tool. |
Pekr 15-Jun-2007 [1525x5] | thanks, will investigate it ... |
looks interesting. And maybe it is a distro, I once linked to here .... | |
... back then, when RT was investigating distros too .... | |
or ... it was other way around ... it was RT who told us, what distro they choosed? | |
studied ClarkConnect - it seems like an exactl solution, when you want to provide ISP services, with all those antispam services included, unified configuration interface, backups, so you might have a good sleep .... | |
Robert 15-Jun-2007 [1530] | Why not Debian? IMO one of the best distros. Good packet management. It doesn't come to fancy but rock solid. |
Pekr 15-Jun-2007 [1531x5] | Because, for me - I need a server, and I want to have a good sleep! :-) |
I have old Fedora Core 1 server, my friend moved to Prague and my primary hd crashed. It was difficult situation for me. There was a cript, which at least packed all content to secondary hw ... | |
the recovery was not so easy, because he navigated mi vai phone (3 hours) and I first had to prepare partitions etc. So I look for some other "easy", but complete solution ... | |
I will try with Ubuntu initially (which is - Debian based) | |
but no more console - I want web based configuration, so that my brother can do it without me. | |
Robert 15-Jun-2007 [1536] | For server Debian is very good. |
Pekr 15-Jun-2007 [1537] | there are many good servers imo. It is not problem to actually have a server. But disaster recovery scenario is important for me. Because I have to be sure, that when I am no business trip and server crashes, my brother will be able to recover basic services with few phone calls :-) |
Kaj 15-Jun-2007 [1538] | Yes, generic servers make you do a lot of work for such things. SME Server and indeed ClarkConnect are custom-made for the things you want. SME Server has more integrated user management, but ClarkConnect is easier to put extra software on that is not part of the standard distribution |
Pekr 15-Jun-2007 [1539x2] | SME server - is that something particular? |
what does SME stand for? | |
Kaj 15-Jun-2007 [1541x2] | Running extra software will make backup and restoration more difficult, thouh |
Small and Medium Enterprise | |
Pekr 15-Jun-2007 [1543x3] | ah, thanks .... |
btw - how does Syllable go? (you can answer in the syllable group) | |
Graham - to not spam Syllable group - http://bengross.com/smallunix.html | |
Gabriele 15-Jun-2007 [1546] | petr, www.rebol.net is running on clarkconnect, and mail.rebol.net will probably be moved to it soon. |
Kaj 15-Jun-2007 [1547x2] | Ah, good choice :-) |
Better than the previous one, at least... | |
Maxim 15-Jun-2007 [1549x2] | does rebol run on DSL ? |
(Damn Small Linux) | |
Kaj 15-Jun-2007 [1551] | Don't know why it wouldn't |
Maxim 15-Jun-2007 [1552x2] | hummm that might be interesting linux test setup... as it runs hosted and takes very little ram :-) |
actually, some of my rebol apps might take more ram the the os :-D | |
older newer | first last |