World: r3wp

Does the encapper modify the file scheme? Couldn't that be extended?

No, the encapper has no effect on file scheme.

File scheme is native, so no, it can't be extended.

Is the VFS in the binary your own, then?

Yes, but it is a very basic one and you need to use custom function 
calls, like: do-cache, load-cache, read-cache....

Ah, that explains the differences between the binary and source versions. 
It would be good to neutralise those

It would also have been good if the file scheme in REBOL were hackable. 
Per-app namespaces are always useful

You'd basically get the framework Tamas wants

Any problem in computer science can be solved by adding another indirection.

Kaj: I have pushed a fix for the verbose mode making Cheyenne crash 
when running as none-root. It works well here on my Linux box. Let 
me know if you have other issues (locally generated files issue aside).

btw, http://equi4.com/starkit/index.htmlis an encapping solution 
for tcl.

i just accidentally saw it mentioned in a rebol blog entry: http://www.rebol.com/cgi-bin/blog.r?view=0375#comments
 :)

TCL has a capable VFS, similar to REBOL

Doc, it works, with -vvvvvv and even when I've run it as root first. 
It can't create all its logs then, but at least it doesn't crash. 
Thanks again!

Doc, trying to start cheyenne   on win7 with UAC enabled, I get this 
error message: 

You need administrator rights to switch to Windows Services mode 
!
   

thing is I've never tried to switch to windows Service mode!!!


a part from the warning popping up the rebol console, the app seems 
to work ok.

this is with all releases I've tried, including the v142 release.

the warning popping up the rebol console
 Are you running it from sources?

yes

Looking at the sources, I've found a code path leading to this error 
msg where the internal /quiet refinement is not honored. Fixing that.

stupid question, can the source version run as a service, or only 
the binary one?

IIRC, you can run it from sources too. Instead of putting cheyenne.exe 
as the service target, it will put rebol.exe.

But you might have issues with paths.

Max: fix released.

thks.

11/5-23:48:50.843304-[HTTPd] Trying phase url-to-filename ( mod-static 
)

11/5-23:48:50.843599-## Error in [uniserve] : On-received call failed 
with error: make object! [
    code: 312
    type: 'script
    id: 'cannot-use
    arg1: 'path
    arg2: 'none!
    arg3: none
    near: [cfg/root-dir req/in/path req/in/target]
    where: 'rejoin
] !

any idea what can this be?
im not sure how to interpret the error message

(and why can't we see a line number for the error, btw?)

Is your configuration complete? Seems like it may be missing the 
root dir

hm... i thought i wrote a message before the previous one or rather 
together with it... :/  or i just imagined... possible. i was tired.

ah, i wrote it to my collegue then forgot to write here too

so the issue was:

i had no default vhost defined and i was accessing a non-defined 
vhost.


but kaj, how can u read what u've just said from this error message?

those args are completely fucked up too. there is a lit-word of a 
datatype's name but without an exclamation mark, then comes none! 
as lit-word, then comes none as ... i don't know for sure, as a value?

It says cannot use path near cfg/root-dir, so that seems to me to 
mean that the configuration lacks a root-dir :-)

>> cfg: none
== none
>> cfg/root-dir
** Script Error: Cannot use path on none! value
** Near: cfg/root-dir

like this?

Almost. cfg is probably defined, but not the root-dir in it

>> cfg: []                
== []
>> cfg/root-dir           
** Script Error: Invalid path value: root-dir
** Near: cfg/root-dir

it would be like this, wouldn't it?

Ah, maybe cfg is completely lacking, then

but why am i not getting such a nice and descriptive error?
btw, i was trying to catch this error, but no luck:
>> e: catch [cfg/root-dir]
** Script Error: Invalid path value: root-dir
** Near: cfg/root-dir
>> e: try [cfg/root-dir]  
** Script Error: Invalid path value: root-dir
** Near: cfg/root-dir

how can i get this as an error object, do i can explore?

I think you're focusing too much on the details. I never noticed 
all those ' and ! :-)

If you would FORM that error, it may be a bit more like English. 
Or at least in R3

:) i've been told im too meticulous or what

I notice that most programmers have a tendency to loose sight of 
the wood for the trees

btw, the thing above worked. 'e got its value. i was just confused 
by the output.
didn't know that an error! is displayed like that in the console

It's a good skill to be able to sort out details. Most people can't. 
But you need to start with the overview to see the meaning and decide 
where to focus your efforts

i think i have a better understanding of most of the things compared 
to my collegues, so i usually excel in debugging and i think i thank 
this ability of mine being curious about such details, so i can understand 
things a lot deeper than the average fellows

Probably

im just fucking curious, nah. can't help w that :)

and thx for putting me on track :)

Me too, but it's times like these that differences with other people's 
brains pop up that I can't really put my finger on, either :-)

I always considered myself detail oriented, but there's still a difference 
with my peers

By the way, I also removed my default host, but I don't get errors 
when I go to localhost

but why am i not getting such a nice and descriptive error?

 Because I am so used to read disarmed errors, that I don't require 
 pretty printing them. I guess I should change that.

I get an error when accessing a not defined vhost, but not the same 
as yours (it stops on missing 'default section here).