r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[All] except covered in other channels

Tomc
24-Feb-2005
[1286]
and it keeps them in the loop, not obsoleating yourself may make 
good bussiness sense (I am useless at bussiness so I am geussing 
here)
JaimeVargas
24-Feb-2005
[1287]
I think the should build some redundancy in the name resolution part 
of the AltMe service otherwise there will be service cut-offs.
Tomc
24-Feb-2005
[1288x2]
I think their feeling is that if they can provide reliable world-name 
service then it is the best choice.
and they think they can
JaimeVargas
24-Feb-2005
[1290]
Tom, there other ways to address the "obsoleating" policy that doesn't 
require service cuts.
Tomc
24-Feb-2005
[1291x2]
however realithy does bite
I am not the one that needs convincing ;)
Pekr
24-Feb-2005
[1293]
Tomc - if there is any business practice, I just don't buy it and 
SafeWorlds wants to stay in control. Then they should not promote 
product as private. IIRC, folks are reporting even their private 
running worlds don't run because of look-up server failure ...
Tomc
24-Feb-2005
[1294]
but they are private in that the data exchanged after the world-name-server 
lookup does not go anywhere near the world-name-server... it is just 
words
Terry
24-Feb-2005
[1295]
I'd be really embarrased right about now if I had promoted Altme 
as a corporate communications tool.
JaimeVargas
24-Feb-2005
[1296]
Well... Partially truth. The name server is consulted all the time. 
At least from my pkt trace. I am looking more deeply into it.
Tomc
24-Feb-2005
[1297]
If safeworlds were able to provide the service they are attempting 
to then we would not care for the most part
Pekr
24-Feb-2005
[1298]
Well, imagine running some cooperative group of ppl and lose ability 
to work because of AltME outage. What is even more strange is, that 
SafeWorlds did not bother to post any kind of message on their website. 
RT did ....
Tomc
24-Feb-2005
[1299]
effectivly true... if you have a connection and the world_name-server 
goes away you do not loose the connection you have.
Pekr
24-Feb-2005
[1300]
yes, that is probably true .....
Tomc
24-Feb-2005
[1301]
definatly
JaimeVargas
24-Feb-2005
[1302]
The msg are sent encrypted between server and client. But the name 
server is consulted all the time to know if there are msg waiting 
or something similar. I ma not quite sure why the name server keeps 
engaged after initial resolving.
Pekr
24-Feb-2005
[1303]
It does? Strange ....
JaimeVargas
24-Feb-2005
[1304]
If you had a pkt tracer check out the traffic going to 66.218.43.215 
port 5500
Tomc
24-Feb-2005
[1305x2]
coule be keep-alive or statistics gathering
quality control not needed for operation
Pekr
24-Feb-2005
[1307]
yes, I have Ethereal, never checked on AltME yet ...
JaimeVargas
24-Feb-2005
[1308x3]
;Interesting every second the client send a request that looks like
cmd: live data:  [world-name binary64]
;and the server replies with this
cmd: lookup data: ok
In the case above the "client" is my private AltMe world server. 
So the traffic is being sent from my server to the nameserver every 
second. I guess is a way to keep the ownership of the free AltMe 
world names.
Enough hacking back to real work...
[unknown: 9]
24-Feb-2005
[1311x2]
.
Tomc wrote "safeworlds did have a good long run with no downtime, 
but stuff happens eventually"


Thank you, and yes we did.  The error that happened today was fixed, 
and an additional check is now being made to prevent that from happening 
again in the future.


One thing I can clearly say is that each problem has been unique, 
and each time one happens (a severe failure) we stop everything and 
jump on it, and in addition to correcting the current problem, write 
code to prevent the same problem from happening in the future.


We have been down less than Live Journal, which has millions of people, 
and hundreds of servers for the same time period.  So we rock!
BrianW
24-Feb-2005
[1313]
and you're modest too ;-)
[unknown: 9]
24-Feb-2005
[1314]
Modesty is a disease, and it wastes time, and truncates communication, 
which are both ethical crimes.
BrianW
24-Feb-2005
[1315]
heh.
[unknown: 9]
24-Feb-2005
[1316x2]
Anyone here know anything about Kylix?
and I mean you have installed and used it.
BrianW
24-Feb-2005
[1318]
for more than 30 minutes? No.
Graham
24-Feb-2005
[1319]
I still think the ip address should be cached in case the name server 
goes down .. if that was the problem.
Terry
24-Feb-2005
[1320x2]
It is far more impressive when others discover your good qualities 
without your help.
  -- Miss Manners
“The first test of a truly great man is his humility.”
                                                John Ruskin
Graham
24-Feb-2005
[1322]
terry .. can you post these into the quotes channel instead ?  Or, 
I can rename this the quote2 channel!
[unknown: 5]
24-Feb-2005
[1323]
Anyone tried the new MS Antispyware software.  Its pretty sweet.
Graham
24-Feb-2005
[1324]
Yes, see windows group .. I tried it a couple of weeks ago.
[unknown: 5]
24-Feb-2005
[1325x2]
testing my new color
Ahh purdy
Terry
25-Feb-2005
[1327]
Graham, you may want to change the name of this group to All, but 
quotes.
Graham
25-Feb-2005
[1328]
I've generalised the exceptions
Terry
25-Feb-2005
[1329]
Well, then.. you best be getting over to the Blog Chat group and 
get on Anton's case.. I see a quote there that's obviously out of 
order.
Graham
25-Feb-2005
[1330]
I always wanted to be a traffic cop
BrianW
25-Feb-2005
[1331]
oy. Talk about a crappy duty. Sorry, Graham ;-)
Graham
25-Feb-2005
[1332]
if you get a commission for every ticket ...
BrianW
25-Feb-2005
[1333]
Yeah, that wouldn't be so bad.
Graham
25-Feb-2005
[1334x2]
I thought that traffic duties were going to be safer than policing.
The first time I tried policing .. someone broke my leg :(