r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[All] except covered in other channels

Volker
31-Dec-2005
[1896]
Is there a chance to set up ios-servers, or is that to expensive?
Graham
31-Dec-2005
[1897]
rebol.org is the library site and the mailing list site.  It's not 
an aggregator site.
Volker
31-Dec-2005
[1898x3]
Must it be rebol-only, or can it be a meeting-place for other languages/topics 
too? Which would be cool in case we do it in rebol.
Agree with Graham. Its more our script-lexicon, not the palace.
And agree with Reichart that such a site would be cool. (Reading 
the "full own server"-part)
[unknown: 9]
31-Dec-2005
[1901]
I don't know what they can do better, my only point is, don't let 
our inability to find a Rebol solution to a problem stop us from 
finding a solution to the problem.

IOS is great as long as it is an "Open" IOS servers.  Meaning EVERYONE 
is welcome.  I want to see an end to any form of elitism in the Rebol 
community.  It hurts everyone.

Yes, I'm clear on what Rebol.org is, still looks like it was designed 
by the Incarceration committee for the Federal government.


Other languages, SURE.  That only drives traffic.  Although it would 
probably end up being just in the forums.
Volker
31-Dec-2005
[1902]
(Full own server could mean uniserv2 (forgot the real name) and a 
fast vanilla based on that.
Graham
31-Dec-2005
[1903]
We don't have that many people here who have design skills
[unknown: 9]
31-Dec-2005
[1904]
Graham wins the "first to say something can't be done" award.
Volker
31-Dec-2005
[1905]
Unless they are paid and can spend more time?
Graham
31-Dec-2005
[1906x3]
thanks.
What's so pizzaz about the ruby site ?
Are you sure you're not just venting ??
[unknown: 9]
31-Dec-2005
[1909]
We don't design anything, we find a site that already looks great, 
and use it.  Pay homage, as we like to say.
Volker
31-Dec-2005
[1910]
I see IOS more like a quick meeting-place. Want to do something, 
set up new server. Together with web-publishing. Say we have a few 
licenses for some projects.
Graham
31-Dec-2005
[1911x2]
I agree we should use off the shelf components.
This not invented here thing gets tiresome.
[unknown: 9]
31-Dec-2005
[1913x2]
Ruby's site is actually pretty cool, and my fav part is:  Ruby 1.8.4 
released! [2005-12-24] by maki Ruby 1.8.4 has been released. on the 
first line.  It means it is ALIVE, people are posting, stuff is HAPPENING. 
 

How about you help, by finding sites that are even better, as opposed 
to questioning the few sites I found?
And venting does not come with offers to pay for stuff...it does 
not come with solutions.  Lets move forward and MAKE something.
Graham
31-Dec-2005
[1915]
I don't go to non rebol language sites !
Volker
31-Dec-2005
[1916]
How looks vanilla? I like it, by i am no art-guy.
Graham
31-Dec-2005
[1917x2]
I tried using vanilla for this purpose ... but I'm not a graphics/design 
guy
and vanilla is so sloooooow
Volker
31-Dec-2005
[1919]
Your server had technical problems. First i was reluctant to spawn 
a process, then i forgot a bit about it.
Graham
31-Dec-2005
[1920]
well, it was actually a rebol problem .. I wasn't the only one to 
report hanging daemons.
Volker
31-Dec-2005
[1921]
I heard there is a combination of uniserv and vanilla, which is much 
faster. I guess vanilla runs on a daemon then. by cgi, it scans tons 
of files each time.
Graham
31-Dec-2005
[1922]
And here's another attempt using mediawiki

http://compkarori.com/rebolwiki/index.php/Main_Page
Volker
31-Dec-2005
[1923x2]
I know. Sorry for wording.
Wanted topoint out: This is a dedicated box.
Graham
31-Dec-2005
[1925x2]
I think you're talking about implementation details .. whereas R 
is looking at the overall picture.
I guess we're talking about finding a portal ...
Volker
31-Dec-2005
[1927]
No, wanted to push vanilla a bit. I think you are hit by bad experience.
[unknown: 9]
31-Dec-2005
[1928]
I'm open to what every one agrees on.  If it works it works, if it 
does not it does not.
Graham
31-Dec-2005
[1929]
well, you can run vanilla .. but someone needs to customise it to 
give it that inviting/live look.
Volker
31-Dec-2005
[1930x2]
How much load/data etc do you expect?
I hope the original developers are interested. Have seen some different 
looks, if that developers jump in?
[unknown: 9]
31-Dec-2005
[1932]
Hard to tell.
Graham
31-Dec-2005
[1933x4]
This is a vanilla site heavily customised by Chris

http://www.ross-gill.com/
I think it needs a news section, a chat section, a download section, 
a place to vote and comment on software.
what about this site http://www.zope.org/
The Web Site for the Zope Community
Volker
31-Dec-2005
[1937x2]
http://www.compkarori.com/vanillai like the calendar.
(btw in 3 days you can make a 1000days-party :)
Graham
31-Dec-2005
[1939]
hehe
Volker
31-Dec-2005
[1940x2]
Its possible to run multiple vanillas. Then each project can have 
its own look.
Sharing user-accounts, maybe some way of cross-linking, maybe changing 
the dialects in a more rebol-way.
Graham
31-Dec-2005
[1942x3]
now, that was a news site ... blog etc... but after a 1000 days, 
not a single news entry except by myself.
so, I'm somewhat pessemistic about a community collaboration on such 
a project.
this is not a problem that can be solved by throwing a server at 
it .. as we already done that.
Volker
31-Dec-2005
[1945]
The best place to look may be the french community?