World: r3wp
[All] except covered in other channels
older newer | first last |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1931] | I hope the original developers are interested. Have seen some different looks, if that developers jump in? |
[unknown: 9] 31-Dec-2005 [1932] | Hard to tell. |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1933x4] | This is a vanilla site heavily customised by Chris http://www.ross-gill.com/ |
I think it needs a news section, a chat section, a download section, a place to vote and comment on software. | |
what about this site http://www.zope.org/ | |
The Web Site for the Zope Community | |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1937x2] | http://www.compkarori.com/vanillai like the calendar. |
(btw in 3 days you can make a 1000days-party :) | |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1939] | hehe |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1940x2] | Its possible to run multiple vanillas. Then each project can have its own look. |
Sharing user-accounts, maybe some way of cross-linking, maybe changing the dialects in a more rebol-way. | |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1942x3] | now, that was a news site ... blog etc... but after a 1000 days, not a single news entry except by myself. |
so, I'm somewhat pessemistic about a community collaboration on such a project. | |
this is not a problem that can be solved by throwing a server at it .. as we already done that. | |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1945] | The best place to look may be the french community? |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1946] | who knows ... |
[unknown: 9] 31-Dec-2005 [1947] | so, I'm somewhat pessemistic about a community collaboration on such a project. Pessimism implies something can fail…what can fail here? Centralized information does not exist. Building a site that centralizes information instantly accomplished the goal, as long as it can be updated by the very creation of information. If it was nothing but an RSS transponder it would already accomplish something. The trick to all of this is simply opening everything up. Which brings up another great example, you blog, and your blogs have 0 comments. I blog (to a more private forum not computer related), I get anywhere between 20 and 100 comments. But it is because I'm linked off a centralized feed. People need to be invited in, given places to go, and know that things are happening. |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1948x2] | I think of an alternate explanation .. Altme consumes all the chat resources available. |
look at http://www.reboltalk.com/forums/.. the last post Nov 26. | |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1950] | How about free hosting, like lycos or such? peoples build their homes there, add rebol-widgets to pages? To get a community running? |
[unknown: 9] 31-Dec-2005 [1951x2] | I think of an alternate explanation .. Altme/Rebol3 consumes all the chat resources available of the more prominent supporters. This is my point! We are all hidden in here. It is elitist, and there isn't even a way for people to come in easily. Sure we will have to deal with Trolls (don't we already?) but we can see some new blood as well. |
Volker, in fact that is sort of what I'm saying. Except I'm not suggesting anyone needs to move their stuff to this site, quite the opposite. The site is to centralize all the information about all the other sites and places. It is mostly a giant voting engine. The news is just the top stories. The forum is just a place for people to ask questions, in fact the mirror of Rebol3 should be there. The library would still be over on Rebol.org. but the reviews would be on RebolCentral.com. | |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1953x2] | I did not mean host only rebol. Host daily stuff, blogs. Then the devs are wizards in a community. |
And the others get contact with rebol, because they can add guestbooks etc on their pages. | |
[unknown: 9] 31-Dec-2005 [1955] | I'm cool with adding this stuff. |
Graham 31-Dec-2005 [1956x2] | rebol.org already has "voting" in that you can see which scripts have been downloaded. |
but I think you have to login to see this stuff. | |
[unknown: 9] 31-Dec-2005 [1958] | Knowing the download is useful, but outright voting/ranking is needed. Off the top of my head a script needs: Category Lines of code Author(s) Publisher License Requirements One sentence description. 500 word description. filesize Date of last update Version History (when it was updated, lines of code, version numbers, etc). Screen shots (if applicable) Average rating Review formatted as Pro and Con. Editor's rating & Review Comments: (hangs off the forum) |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1959] | Connections to other scripts? "Customers who downloaded this script downloaded also"? |
[unknown: 9] 31-Dec-2005 [1960] | Exactyl! Now you're talking. |
Volker 31-Dec-2005 [1961] | 2006 in 40 minutes, till later |
Terry 1-Jan-2006 [1962] | Graham wins the first to say something can't be done" award.".. Graham, looks like you've earned the coveted "energy vampire" award for today. |
yeksoon 1-Jan-2006 [1963] | Please, no IOS. My suggestion, promote the mailing list..and use IRC. Example, the committe in charge can use IRC for regular discussions, and anyone who may have interests on any topic can just logon to the channel and take part. Reduce the 'elitism' part. ....make it more accessible for developers. Some of them could be on Mac etc. |
PeterWood 1-Jan-2006 [1964] | As far as I can tell, the main constraint on developing Rebol.org is the lack of people prepared to get involved and give their time. From my knowledge, Sunanda has single-handely maintained and developed Rebol.org for the last two years. (All in his spare time as he does it on a voluntary basis). (I'm definitely more of a hindrance than a help:-)). Reichart is right, Rebol.org looks drab when compared with something like Ruby Garden FAQs. It doesn't appear friendly. Rebol.org lacks features though many that it has aren't used much(member home pages, forums for individual scripts, articles). If I remember correctly, Sunanda has asked on a number of occasions for suggestions and help with the design/layout of the website. He's put in place most of the suggestions received which has resulted in some improvement in the look over the last couple of years. What Rebol.org probably lacks is the clear focus and direction that creates a sense of purpose which will encourage people to volunteer. The may be a great part to the "paternal" relationship with RT which not only "fathered" the library system but continues to finance the server. A successful RebolCentral would probably give Rebol.org a renewed focus and probably won't divert any resources away from it. |
[unknown: 9] 1-Jan-2006 [1965] | Yeksoon, I don't think IOS is where topics should be had, but offering a public IOS system that does "something" could be cool to show off. Sort of like a model house. No? Peter, I actually did not know who ran Rebol.org (see! My point exactly about -centralizing information, :-) ) I think we could work together though. As far as I'm concerned, anything built for RebolCentral.org will be open and free for trade. Perhaps we can build and lock down templates that get carried to the other sites to create unity. I see no reason to replicate anything as well. In other words, if possible, we build one database of all content (perhaps what is already on Rebol.org) and leave it there, simply build a review system that points to it. Most download sites work this way. They are just a clearing house to other sites. |
Robert 1-Jan-2006 [1966x2] | Where can I get the latest SDK download from? |
On rebol.net I don't understand these two versions: 5-Dec-2005 Release Win32 031 View 1.3.2 18-Nov-2005 Alpha See Above View 1.3.61 Isn't 1.3.61 more advanced then 1.3.2? I'm mostly looking for the plug-in DLL. | |
Volker 1-Jan-2006 [1968x3] | IOS: I would not use it as a permanent server. Instead: When we did the bbs, carl fired up a fresh one. We had chat and file-syncing. I would prefer to use it in such short-term ways. Then backing project up to web. |
rebol.org - afaik its hosted on some shared server. maybe we can host it on the dedicated too? Then Sunanda & team can play whit daemons. chat, auto-filesyncing etc. rebol-org, layout. IMHO it looks like slashdot. :)) I see rebol.com and rebolcentral as the use-sites and rebol.net, rebol.org as the programmer-sites. central and .org could share some things, like list of projects. But some thingslike the ML-arhcive is better on .org, and a clear "nerds"-look may be a good signal. | |
sdk: the 1.3.2 . 1.3.62 is 1.3.2 with rebcode. | |
BrianH 2-Jan-2006 [1971] | Or would be if there was a 1.3.62 - right now the latest rebcode release is 1.3.61, based on the 1.3.1 codebase. 1.3.2 is actually more recent. |
sqlab 2-Jan-2006 [1972] | Ein frohes und glückliches 2006 für Alle |
Geomol 2-Jan-2006 [1973] | Happy New Year! Let it be a good one! :-) |
Louis 2-Jan-2006 [1974] | Happy New Year everybody! Already almost two days old! |
[unknown: 9] 3-Jan-2006 [1975] | Worse virus Microsoft (and any of us using Windows) has ever seen! http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/912840.mspx |
JaimeVargas 3-Jan-2006 [1976] | No virus(es) in OSX ;-) |
[unknown: 9] 3-Jan-2006 [1977] | They may have lot more to do with the fact that hackers don't target OSX. |
Volker 3-Jan-2006 [1978] | Windows executing anything is a good help. |
JaimeVargas 3-Jan-2006 [1979] | OpenBSD doesn't have virus(es) |
Volker 3-Jan-2006 [1980] | There is Theo. Hackers fear the revenge.. :) |
older newer | first last |