World: r3wp
[All] except covered in other channels
older newer | first last |
Henrik 19-Sep-2006 [2342] | round now/time/precise |
Louis 19-Sep-2006 [2343x2] | I'm timing a vid script, and the nano seconds never display, I assume because vid refreshes every second. |
Henrik, that worked! Thanks! I love AltME and all you helpful guys. | |
Louis 31-Oct-2006 [2345] | I'm rather badly needing a pagemaker pm5 file converted to ASCII format. My copy of Pagemaker has been corrupted, and I just want to print a document using LaTeX. The file is about 309 MB. Is there anyone here that can do this for me? |
[unknown: 9] 1-Nov-2006 [2346] | May I ask...why do you still "print" stuff? |
Louis 1-Nov-2006 [2347x3] | Because, I'm in a small village in Indonesia. None of the people in this village have computers. Most of them are very poor. |
On AltME I live in the future, but in this village I live 75 years ago or more. | |
Some of the major cities here are much more advanced, of course. | |
[unknown: 9] 1-Nov-2006 [2350] | Ah, I get it. I really want to make a bunch of jokes about printing bibles, but will skip it. |
Graham 1-Nov-2006 [2351x2] | 309Mbs ! |
how many 1000s of pages is that? | |
Louis 1-Nov-2006 [2353x2] | :>) Typo. That should have been KBs. What a difference one letter makes. |
Programmers notice such things, since one letter often makes the difference between a program running of not. | |
[unknown: 9] 1-Nov-2006 [2355] | :) |
Maarten 12-Jan-2007 [2356] | What would be your #2 language after REBOL for developing an entrprise apllication/web application? |
Sunanda 12-Jan-2007 [2357] | I'd use Rexx if they let me: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/REXX |
BrianW 13-Jan-2007 [2358] | Possibly Python |
Maxim 15-Jan-2007 [2359] | python for sure... just cause it will easily symbiose with C/C++ and makes it very easy to work with both hand in hand. |
Pekr 15-Jan-2007 [2360] | Hmm, would it be possible to get Rebol working with C more easily too? |
Maxim 15-Jan-2007 [2361x3] | yes, if we could compile rebol directly using rebol.o and link it with any other C .o module and if we could interpret. .c / .cpp / .h files directly and convert the stubs directly within rebol. |
(like python does) | |
it seems as if R3 will allow us to link to rebol itself... so this might be possible... as you have noticed... too in some of Carl's R3 posts. | |
Pekr 15-Jan-2007 [2364] | I am not sure it is possible. Is Python just some kind of direct C extension or what? |
Maxim 15-Jan-2007 [2365x6] | internally it using the same type structure (immutable strings, etc) |
and in loads C stubs easily. so you don't have to try and make it work... its python's main feature... its so easy, everyone is able to port their legacy C stuff and then use it within a scripted env. | |
and most C libs are within python as-is, so things like sockets, regexp, threads and such use the same mechanics and nomenclature... so there is very little adapting a part from the peculiar indent grouping. | |
obviously, python has other merits, but making C integration that easy made many developpers "take the risk" of trying it out, since it did not means wasting years of investment. | |
there is nothing like proving an easy, lazy path to migration. | |
proving= providing | |
Pekr 15-Jan-2007 [2371] | that sounds good. I tried to look into Ruby and Python, and if I would learn another new language, I would learn python - the syntax is pretty readable ... |
Maarten 15-Jan-2007 [2372] | Yes, and the language is as capable as rebol, except for symbolic manipulation. But with a good parser generator you can do a lot |
Pekr 16-Jan-2007 [2373x2] | guys, don't you know any application, which would be able to generate traffic? I want to install two Mikrotik routers in Dual Nstreme mode, and I would like to test real-life thoughput. Copying one big file amongst two ends is interesting test for line stability, but there is a difference if you run one connection, or few hundreds ones ... |
IIRC there was some perl tool to test Apache, but it required Apache (webserver) on the other end .... I need something like "point-to-point" testing tool ... | |
Volker 16-Jan-2007 [2375] | rebol would notwork for that? |
Pekr 16-Jan-2007 [2376x3] | Volker - did not think about that :-) |
I would have to implement some kind of tasking ... not sure 1 rebol process is able to generat the throughput ... | |
and - how would I measure real packet size? I am not interested in data-only size .... Hmm, but ethernet plus ip plus tcp header have some constant overhead I think :-) | |
Volker 16-Jan-2007 [2379x2] | with async? |
if one of the gurus steps in to write the script^^ | |
Pekr 16-Jan-2007 [2381x2] | I have my own, very short but working - multiserver .... |
I just should generate 1000 opened connections and try to send random data .... | |
Volker 16-Jan-2007 [2383] | without async there are little hidden waits for handshaking AFAIK. |
Pekr 16-Jan-2007 [2384] | yes, probably connection times ... hmm, interesting idea, I might try it anyway .... |
Volker 16-Jan-2007 [2385] | or a script to launch some processes, each using sync io. |
Pekr 16-Jan-2007 [2386] | I can start multiple Rebol instances with the same script. I think that multiplexing to some 100 ports per instance should be ok, no? I can open connections first, then start sending data .... |
Gabriele 16-Jan-2007 [2387x2] | iperf |
http://dast.nlanr.net/Projects/Iperf/ | |
Maarten 16-Jan-2007 [2389] | Petr, iperf is the de facto tool for this. We use it in the Detective as well |
Pekr 16-Jan-2007 [2390x2] | ok, thanks guys, looks good. I am just studying command-line options ... |
I have my rebol multi-server, hopefully it would work, but I would need to think of how to do calculations :-) | |
older newer | first last |