World: r3wp
[All] except covered in other channels
older newer | first last |
Anton 1-Feb-2008 [2592] | Interesting discussion. |
Reichart 3-Feb-2008 [2593] | Is there a good example of a simple vector rendering/drawing demo in REBOL? I have been thinking about a tool I want to make that allows me to track things around my house. The problem with CAD programs is that they are designed to "create", not to record. The concept is so different in fact that a graphical interface is only needed as confirmation. Input is actually better if done "descriptively" For example, I would rather simply measure something (like the outside of the house, by simply writing down every surface length, and every "turn"). A rectangle might be something like: 45' 10, R 10, R 10, R 10 Where the first line heads off 45 degrees (0 = North) Then it is a matter of naming objects, and tagging them (better than layers, so you can display things based on tags, like "Electrical", "Plumbing", etc.) |
Brock 3-Feb-2008 [2594] | Interesting idea Reichart |
Gabriele 4-Feb-2008 [2595] | Reichart, i think it should be easy to do. (Especially in R3 :) |
Gregg 4-Feb-2008 [2596x2] | Sounds a lot like turtle graphics in Logo. |
And if you have a GPS you can import and parse data from, you can be the turtle. :-) | |
Reichart 4-Feb-2008 [2598] | Agreed, this is easy, I was just hoping to look at something already done, perhaps even by Richard... The cool thing is this could be saved in XML, and be compatible with other systems then. The important thing is that no CAD system I know of lets you easily build an object, (even like a little JBox) by telling it that it is x distance from the corner of some other object. This is the key to logging things around a house. I want to build a really powerful way to triangulate on a point. |
Pekr 4-Feb-2008 [2599x3] | uh, I don't remember the product I liked, but it working in some non-traditional "cad" way ... |
http://www.homeplanpro.com/ | |
well, generally I googled "cad house" | |
Carl 4-Feb-2008 [2602x4] | Just stopping by to say hello. Yes, it's been a while. Sorry about that. R3 has had me far out to sea - especially the Unicode changes of recent. |
Note I have not had time to read any of the above messages (in this group or others). So, if there is something important for me to read, let me know. | |
(Put a note in the Carl Only group.) | |
(No... created new group: Carl Links - drop a note there. Thanks!) | |
Gregg 4-Feb-2008 [2606] | I did a very crude and basic Logo/turtle system. So it's a very doable concept. |
Reichart 4-Feb-2008 [2607x2] | Pekr, thanks, but again, that is a Planner, I'm looking for the opposite. The house alrady exists, I'm just logging. This is a concept that does not really exist as a product, (but should). Every time you update a wire, or install a new sink, etc. you need to log just that one object. |
Gregg, does it use AGG? | |
Pekr 4-Feb-2008 [2609x2] | Reichart - IIRC those system exist, but I only once met enterprise level one. Thosoe are called "facility" management. They go down to invoices - you can look and see what particular wire type goes thru your house, etc - http://www.xanadu.cz/apps/fmflash/fmatweb.asp |
can't remember some other products, I never saw it working in real-life. I just knew one consultant who did this kind of stuff and we had some chat about it. | |
Gregg 4-Feb-2008 [2611] | It's just REBOL, Reichart, so it uses AGG on newer releases. It just generates DRAW commands. |
Reichart 5-Feb-2008 [2612x2] | Which REBOL script do you think would be the best to start with? |
You know......................after much thought, what I might just do is write a simple ML to SVG converter. It would be almost a 1:1 command set (in fact mostly what I would be doing is translating offsets). The ML would be clean, while the emiter would allow a browser to be the viewer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalable_Vector_Graphics | |
Gregg 5-Feb-2008 [2614x2] | I would get Cyphre's opinion on that. Mine is old, and nothing to write home about, but the turtle graphcis concept seems to be a very close match with what you're after. |
Maybe SVG has pathing commands that are close. I don't know. | |
Henrik 5-Feb-2008 [2616] | doesn't the SHAPE command in DRAW basically do this? |
Reichart 5-Feb-2008 [2617] | Henrik, It may, I have never played with DRAW. I'm old, so I still think in PS (Post Script). I'm in a conference now with Richard, and will talk to him as well. I always like to ask around just to test teh waters. I'm going to be curious if SVG is going to catch on. It is a crappy way to store vectors |
Graham 5-Feb-2008 [2618] | Doubt it ... now that Adobe own Macromedia |
Henrik 5-Feb-2008 [2619x2] | SVG has been around for a long time, but is very wide spread in the open source community now. |
but commercially not much. | |
Reichart 6-Feb-2008 [2621] | Graham, what part do you doubt? SVG has promise, and "smells" to me like someting that will grow. It badly needs a Pcode, since there is no reason to parse every time. It looks very promising as a way to do what I want to do, and keep things standard. Plus we might build a DRAW to SVG dialect for Reports, Graphs, and even light interface (like Gantt). |
Oldes 6-Feb-2008 [2622x2] | Current draw is basically SVG |
(but I don't like SVG... I really hate to open page with 3 SVG diagrams and my computer does nothing else than parse and draws these diagrams... the worst it is that the page is from W3C, so they should know that thay can use PNG for these images.. it would require less space to transfer and my computer could do better things while displaying such a page. | |
Pekr 6-Feb-2008 [2624] | PNG can't scale, no? And I can be PNG file smaller than vectors transferred? The slowness of whole stuff is another thing. Dunno if we can support SVG out-of-the-box. We are using AGG, while the rest of the world is using Cairo. |
Oldes 6-Feb-2008 [2625x4] | And since Adobe has Mocaromedias knowhow, why thay should use SVG scripting... but with such a corporations one never knows |
it's a shame I don't know the link... I would post you the SVG source... how large it can be | |
and PNG does not scale, but do I scale web page? | |
Don't forget that SVG is XML so it can be very large if you draw something more complex | |
Pekr 6-Feb-2008 [2629] | OK, but do you think that it is a bad thing to have vector gfx available? That way, VID3 UI will be scallable. Carl also said, that there is some space for improvement. What Cyphre thinks is, that maybe we could get compound rasteriser workind, which could speed things up a bit (Flash uses it) |
Reichart 6-Feb-2008 [2630] | Yes, DRAW is MUCH better than SVG though. Hence I was thinkning about just doing a dialect mostly in DRAW with an SVG emiter. There is SVGZ (zipped SVG), but Pcode would be better. PNG is a container...so it can contain Raster, Vector, well, actually it can contain anything (sort of like Amiga IFF format). |
Oldes 6-Feb-2008 [2631] | I'm not agains vector graphics... I just don't like SVG |
Reichart 6-Feb-2008 [2632x2] | The point of SVG is that it is the lowest common denom... That will ALWAYS suck, but at least you know things will render. |
And I'm FOR vector, but also don't like SVG. But if it is a standard, I will support. It will mean I can send you a graphic, and you can display it with just a browser. | |
Oldes 6-Feb-2008 [2634] | Why there are no SVG maps but everybody is using PNG layers? |
Reichart 6-Feb-2008 [2635] | What do you mean Maps? |
Oldes 6-Feb-2008 [2636] | just an example |
Reichart 6-Feb-2008 [2637x2] | Do you mean map as in Earth? |
Check this out: http://croczilla.com/svg/samples/svgtetris/svgtetris.svg | |
Oldes 6-Feb-2008 [2639x2] | yes |
so what? should I send you some Flash site link? | |
Reichart 6-Feb-2008 [2641] | This is not a compitition...............just showing a cute example. You guys sure do jump to the negative quickly... |
older newer | first last |