World: r3wp
[All] except covered in other channels
older newer | first last |
Pekr 4-Jan-2005 [276] | Has anyone used UML in real-life. Or even more precise - is UML worth studying? I want to construct some system, which will have some object model, inheritance, classes, but dunno if UML is worth studying as reference. I have read few chapters - seems like cool thing, but a bit difficult to swallow - too many terms etc. .... |
eFishAnt 4-Jan-2005 [277] | REBOL cuts out the bureacracy of UML and implements direct. Schler-Mellor and Grady Brooch have some "noble" goals (but the devil's in the implementation), but have never faced anything as powerful as REBOL yet for implementation. I saw Mellor talk once, and he did a great talk on "orthogonal behavior" which is apropos. I think the way to utilize their mess is to do it simpler in REBOL, call it UMLR and teach them the future. |
Pekr 4-Jan-2005 [278x3] | :-) ... yes, I can see your point ... |
I will soon now post some doc(s) for brainstorming - well, maybe not docs, just a brainstorming itself ... I need to find myself and categorise my thoughts and need help on that ... of course I am studying various workflow, business process papers etc ... | |
so far it seems to be that if I want to be really abstract enough, I need such complex things as UML .... | |
eFishAnt 4-Jan-2005 [281] | nah, just dialects |
Pekr 4-Jan-2005 [282] | ... but maybe just because UML is here for real object oriented languages like Java, and once we use Rebol, we don't need such beurocracy to express relations ... |
eFishAnt 4-Jan-2005 [283x2] | you need to define the lexicon of workflow. keep it simple, and follow the flow |
the discipline Carl uses to determine each word that REBOL uses...that is his UML. | |
Vincent 4-Jan-2005 [285] | CELP, QCELP, EVRC: found specifications... awfull complexe specifications : O - (but the QCP file format is quite simple) |
eFishAnt 4-Jan-2005 [286x5] | He told us at Devcon that the most time he spends is selecting the exact right word to use in REBOL. |
(Vincent...I have the CD's from TIA EIA... with sample C code...and some other code as well...;-) | |
EVRC 8k gives almost the same quality of voice as QCELP 13k, thus in USA, for CDMA, EVRC is used to increase voice call capacity. | |
if you are in Europe, then the GSM standards might be most useful to you, and I would have to look them up. | |
(supporting the standards used in VoIP would also be good) | |
Vincent 4-Jan-2005 [291x2] | eFishAnt: sources will help - I'll give it a try |
sound:// need streaming capabilities, for both music and VoIP | |
eFishAnt 4-Jan-2005 [293x3] | yes |
I put sound into show.r ... '-) | |
oh, I have a tic in my eye | |
Tomc 4-Jan-2005 [296] | ant-tics ... yes that makes sense |
eFishAnt 4-Jan-2005 [297] | 0-o-o< |
Chris 4-Jan-2005 [298] | Ogg Vorbis... |
Vincent 4-Jan-2005 [299] | My priorities for sound library is to have at least support to common uncompressed formats r/w, then least cpu-intensive compression schemes r/w |
Geomol 4-Jan-2005 [300] | Are REBOL/SDK issues also discussed in any of these groups? |
Alan 4-Jan-2005 [301] | Geomol:you can make a sdk group under the Rebol group |
Geomol 4-Jan-2005 [302x3] | Ok, I may do that. |
Just reading around and getting up-to-date... I found RAMBO. I send a bug report with the "Feedback" thing on RT's homepage. Should I post it again with RAMBO? Maybe I'll get better response? | |
I mean, I sent a bug report ... | |
Alan 4-Jan-2005 [305] | Geomol:RAMBO is the mail depostitory fro Rebol bugs/bug tracking |
PeterWood 4-Jan-2005 [306] | Pekr: I have found capturing user requirements in Use Cases very helpful. They aren't really part of UML but are one of the main inputs to it. I probably don't build enough systems to have the need to get into UML. Martin Fowler's UML Distilled is probably worth reading as he has a practical point of view. |
BrianW 4-Jan-2005 [307x2] | any REBOLers want to invade 43things.com? |
not so much "invade" as "check out" | |
Gabriele 5-Jan-2005 [309] | Geomol: i'd suggest using RAMBO and not email feedback for bugs. this frees up some time for Carl. |
Geomol 5-Jan-2005 [310x2] | Thanks Gabriele, I'll do that tomorrow, when I get back to the company, I'm doing it for. |
I would like to contact Carl about a relational database, I've done in REBOL, to see, if he can use some of it in any way. Can I contact him here in REBOL3 by writing directly to him? | |
Pekr 5-Jan-2005 [312] | I think you can ... |
Gabriele 5-Jan-2005 [313] | you can, however he doesn't check here very often at times, so you may need some patience :) |
Geomol 5-Jan-2005 [314] | oki doki |
Pekr 5-Jan-2005 [315] | can we know what kind of db is it? rebol level source, or C module linked via library interface, or? |
Geomol 5-Jan-2005 [316x2] | About 50k of REBOL/Core source. Build as a relative level and an index level on top of that - top-most a full relational DB. I've also started a SQL interface, but I'm not sure, if I wanna finish that part. :-) |
Multi-user of course. | |
Pekr 5-Jan-2005 [318] | Geomol - have you looked at RebDB? |
Geomol 5-Jan-2005 [319x2] | Yes, a little bit. |
I made mine as a finishing project for an education, I finished last year. | |
Pekr 5-Jan-2005 [321] | how have you got yourself to Rebol? |
Geomol 5-Jan-2005 [322x2] | Being an Amigan for so many years, I checked on Carl's projects over the years. I started with REBOL 4-5 years ago. |
Pekr, I've seen your nickname many times. How are you related to it? | |
Pekr 5-Jan-2005 [324] | related to what? Rebol? Well, there were those times, in 1996, when Carl tried to resurrect amiga at Viscorp ... then he left, I read his paper about "dream system" - first scripting, then OS, and I believed into it. Well, we are a bit late with the original plan, but I still try to believe :-) |
Geomol 5-Jan-2005 [325] | :-) Let's see, if I can find that paper on the web... could be interesting to read. (Can't remember, if I saw that already somewhere.) |
older newer | first last |