World: r3wp
[All] except covered in other channels
older newer | first last |
[unknown: 5] 18-Jan-2005 [681] | Yeah that is what you need to do |
Graham 18-Jan-2005 [682] | I think I'll bite the bullet and backup, rebuild the array, reinstall Windows 2003, and then restore :( |
[unknown: 5] 18-Jan-2005 [683] | Yeah do the backup regardless but I would suggest before you go further than that - that you try and clear the NVRAM of the card and wipe the disk config and rebuild both and try not to initialize unless it forces you to. Then fail the second drive and see if you can rebuilt it then. But get the backup first. |
Graham 18-Jan-2005 [684] | how to clear the nvram? |
[unknown: 5] 18-Jan-2005 [685] | When I say wipe the disk config there should be an option to write config to disk in the utility and that will do the wiping of the disk config. |
Graham 18-Jan-2005 [686] | ok, I"ll look at that tonight. |
[unknown: 5] 18-Jan-2005 [687x2] | The utility probably has an option to clear its configuration |
Just remember this. That is usually write a config to the disk itself. This is how it knows what slot or position the drive is even if you move them around. But the NVRAM is on the card and usually backed up by battery power to retain the configuration (you need to blow that away). | |
Graham 18-Jan-2005 [689] | no battery so I'll just remove the card. |
[unknown: 5] 18-Jan-2005 [690x3] | Hmm.. |
Ahhh that one has an (optional) battery module. | |
That means it completely using the config of the drive and thats why it detects it automatically as a volume. You most likely wont be able to change that then without a special tool from them since you would need to force a write to the drive config to show that its drive 0 of array 0. | |
Graham 18-Jan-2005 [693] | I'll see if I can see if they have some tools I can download. |
[unknown: 5] 18-Jan-2005 [694x2] | Good luck. I know how frustrating that can be. |
how long has the latency been running on the mailing list. I posted earlier and my post still didn't show up. | |
Graham 18-Jan-2005 [696] | I posted yesterday morning and nothing so far. |
[unknown: 5] 18-Jan-2005 [697] | We need Selma back. Selma was better than this. |
Graham 18-Jan-2005 [698] | It may not be ecartis but their mail server that is the problem. |
Sunanda 18-Jan-2005 [699] | Selma had her off days too: http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/ml-display-message.r?m=rmlHFFB Or, as Graham suggests, it's RT's mail server |
Graham 18-Jan-2005 [700] | my message reached the list at http://mail.rebol.net/cgi-bin/mail-list.r but didn't get out again back to me. |
Sunanda 18-Jan-2005 [701] | I lost one yesterday too, in the same way. It all seemed to be working okay for a week or two, but is slipping again now. |
[unknown: 5] 19-Jan-2005 [702] | Anyone have rebol highlight files for PSPad? |
Graham 22-Jan-2005 [703x2] | I'm playing around with mediawiki .. a great little wiki. Even has preferences for your time zone so that you can see when edits were done according to your own local reference. |
Would be great if such a wiki could be done using Magic. | |
Terry 22-Jan-2005 [705] | I've questioned this a few times over the years now.. If we have a CGI script that uses the mysql protocol, is it necessary to load this protocol with every cgi request? Wouldn't that add some burden to the server? |
Graham 22-Jan-2005 [706x2] | you probably have a pool of connections which are re-used |
forinstance, in Zope, I have a single sql connection which is used by all the "cgi" requests. | |
Terry 22-Jan-2005 [708x2] | But if you want to access a mysql server, the cgi script loads each time, right? |
loads the mysql protocol, that is. | |
Graham 22-Jan-2005 [710] | depends on how it is written. |
Terry 22-Jan-2005 [711] | can you give me an example of a cgi script that access a db, and doesn't load the protocol each time? |
Graham 22-Jan-2005 [712] | any Zope cgi script that access a database does that. |
Terry 22-Jan-2005 [713] | I'm referring to Rebol |
Graham 22-Jan-2005 [714] | if I have a rebol daemon running that has a connection to a odbc database, then my rebol cgi script an interact with that. |
Terry 22-Jan-2005 [715] | via what, tcp? |
Graham 22-Jan-2005 [716] | yes |
Terry 22-Jan-2005 [717] | Well, I wonder what has less overhead.. reading a 23kb protocol with each call, or taking the time to do a tcp call? |
Graham 22-Jan-2005 [718x2] | clearly the latter |
my portal does this .. keeps an open sql connection which is used by incoming requests | |
Terry 22-Jan-2005 [720] | what do you use, rugby? |
Graham 22-Jan-2005 [721] | yes. |
Terry 22-Jan-2005 [722] | What is faster, reading a 100 byte text file, or accessing 100 bytes from a DB? |
Graham 22-Jan-2005 [723] | you would have to do timing studies on questions like this ... |
Terry 22-Jan-2005 [724] | Yeah, just doing that now. |
Graham 22-Jan-2005 [725x3] | after a text file being read from a directory is another db operation. |
after all .. | |
the filing system is a database | |
Terry 22-Jan-2005 [728x3] | is it? |
Ok, doing some timing tests.. using 10000 loops... Firstly, the mysql is choking around the 9800 -9850 mark by denying access at that point... | |
(i think my test code is messed up) | |
older newer | first last |