r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[All] except covered in other channels

Graham
18-Jan-2005
[689]
no battery so I'll just remove the card.
[unknown: 5]
18-Jan-2005
[690x3]
Hmm..
Ahhh that one has an (optional) battery module.
That means it completely using the config of the drive and thats 
why it detects it automatically as a volume.  You most likely wont 
be able to change that then without a special tool from them since 
you would need to force a write to the drive config to show that 
its drive 0 of array 0.
Graham
18-Jan-2005
[693]
I'll see if I can see if they have some tools I can download.
[unknown: 5]
18-Jan-2005
[694x2]
Good luck.  I know how frustrating that can be.
how long has the latency been running on the mailing list.  I posted 
earlier and my post still didn't show up.
Graham
18-Jan-2005
[696]
I posted yesterday morning and nothing so far.
[unknown: 5]
18-Jan-2005
[697]
We need Selma back.  Selma was better than this.
Graham
18-Jan-2005
[698]
It may not be ecartis but their mail server that is the problem.
Sunanda
18-Jan-2005
[699]
Selma had her off days too:

http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/ml-display-message.r?m=rmlHFFB
Or, as Graham suggests, it's RT's mail server
Graham
18-Jan-2005
[700]
my message reached the list at http://mail.rebol.net/cgi-bin/mail-list.r
but didn't get out again back to me.
Sunanda
18-Jan-2005
[701]
I lost one yesterday too, in the same way.

It all seemed to be working okay for a week or two, but is slipping 
again now.
[unknown: 5]
19-Jan-2005
[702]
Anyone have rebol highlight files for PSPad?
Graham
22-Jan-2005
[703x2]
I'm playing around with mediawiki .. a great little wiki.  Even has 
preferences for your time zone so that you can see when edits were 
done according to your own local reference.
Would be great if such a wiki could be done using Magic.
Terry
22-Jan-2005
[705]
I've questioned this a few times over the years now.. 

If we have a CGI script that uses the mysql protocol, is it necessary 
to load this protocol with every cgi request?  Wouldn't that add 
some burden to the server?
Graham
22-Jan-2005
[706x2]
you probably have a pool of connections which are re-used
forinstance, in Zope, I have a single sql connection which is used 
by all the "cgi" requests.
Terry
22-Jan-2005
[708x2]
But if you want to access a mysql server, the cgi script loads each 
time, right?
loads the mysql protocol, that is.
Graham
22-Jan-2005
[710]
depends on how it is written.
Terry
22-Jan-2005
[711]
can you give me an example of a cgi script that access a db, and 
doesn't load the protocol each time?
Graham
22-Jan-2005
[712]
any Zope cgi script that access a database does that.
Terry
22-Jan-2005
[713]
I'm referring to Rebol
Graham
22-Jan-2005
[714]
if I have a rebol daemon running that has a connection to a odbc 
database, then my rebol cgi script an interact with that.
Terry
22-Jan-2005
[715]
via what, tcp?
Graham
22-Jan-2005
[716]
yes
Terry
22-Jan-2005
[717]
Well, I wonder what has less overhead.. reading a 23kb protocol with 
each call, or taking the time to do a tcp call?
Graham
22-Jan-2005
[718x2]
clearly the latter
my portal does this .. keeps an open sql connection which is used 
by incoming requests
Terry
22-Jan-2005
[720]
what do you use, rugby?
Graham
22-Jan-2005
[721]
yes.
Terry
22-Jan-2005
[722]
What is faster, reading a 100 byte text file, or accessing 100 bytes 
from a DB?
Graham
22-Jan-2005
[723]
you would have to do timing studies on questions like this ...
Terry
22-Jan-2005
[724]
Yeah, just doing that now.
Graham
22-Jan-2005
[725x3]
after a text file being read from a directory is another db operation.
after all ..
the filing system is a database
Terry
22-Jan-2005
[728x4]
is it?
Ok, doing some timing tests.. using 10000 loops... 


Firstly, the mysql is choking around the 9800 -9850 mark by denying 
access at that point...
(i think my test code is messed up)
Actually, i was counting down, and mySQL is choking after 150 calls 
or so.
Graham
22-Jan-2005
[732]
are you waiting for responses before you call it again?
Terry
22-Jan-2005
[733x2]
Forced to reduce the number of iterations to 100 for mysql sake.. 
and even then it would choke 50% of the time.. results.. 


Reading the DB used mysql-protocol.r with join mysql://.. localhost 
{select email from table where name='name' }
Reading the file used a: load %file.txt, b: select a 'email
mysql - 1.35 seconds (using time/now/precise

file - 0 seconds (timestart - 18:35:25.531, timefinish - 18:35:25.531)


Conclusion.. no contest.. loading and selecting from file wins hands 
down.
Graham, if i need to wait for a response, then i would need to add 
that time to the total for mysql.
Graham
22-Jan-2005
[735]
and if you have 1million files in the local directory?
Terry
22-Jan-2005
[736x3]
good question... and one million files in the DB as well.
10000 iterations using the load file method.. 0:00:00.781
I doubt very much that the DB could do that.