World: r3wp

http://www.site-assistant.com/faq.rspshows one "is" to much

Site Assistant is is programmed in an innovative programming language 
REBOL ...

sqlab: thanks , fixed
Henrik: you mean that I should add a little more contrast to it?

yes, that could work.

Ok, I will try .. I think you are right

uh, I already see bugs :) .. Henrik . app shouldn't alow you to write 
http://..... just www.domain.com

In Update Website, there is a typo "remeber"

thanks, fixed

In Global Settings, it reads "a email" in a sentence, where it should 
be "an email"

There should probably also be a comma after "expires".

ups yes, fixed again ... If you will need some beta testing Henrik 
tell me

Henrik: which browser do you have?

Safari 4.

Janko, I'm giving it a try with some real-life web-sites. Cool stuff.

Henrik: I haven't tested with that, ( I have with chrome which also 
uses webkit )

Robert, great :)

I think they are close to identical in rendering engine.

... if anything doesn't work please tell me

haven't found problems so far.

( that was directed to Robert, you helped me a lot already , I wouldn't 
be asking for more :) )

amacleod, thanks for telling me about typo .. I fixed it 

about RSP error , I will look at it and fix it , thanks, it seems 
I broke it with the last bigger update!

Janko, Where should we post bugs/comments etc.

:) I have no such place yet .. except me here or my email

which is [janko-:-itm-:-gmail-:-com]

How long does it take for it to fetch website data (Who-is etc.)

Never mind I had to refresh the page

bots wake up and look for tasks every 2-3 minutes now

 I have no such place yet .. except me here or my email
 - I've created a !Site-Assistant group to be such a place.

Janko
http://www.site-assistant.com/sign-up.rsp
recieve -> receive

Peter: wow, nice :D

Anton.. thanks, I fixed that .. and also same mistake on 6 other 
places

very nice work janko, professional looking out of the box  :-)

Thanks Maxim , now it looks a little more pro after you guys told 
me for so many typos :)

I get a SQLite error when I try to add my first domain address; I 
was able to create an empty group OK

RobertS: hm.. what kind of error, does it maybe says something like 
"database locked" or something else?

Hm.. I see that last 2 users had to have errors as their domains 
didn't get passed to the bots. I will go figuring out tonight what 
caused this.

Great article on parse Ladislav. This was exactly what I first looked 
for when I very first started looking at Rebol. Thanks.

Great article, Ladislav. Just tweaked the grammar and added a link 
to tthe Parse Project at the end - Peta wrote a lot about Parse there.

thanks, mhinson and Brian

please, can somebody improve the look of the table in the article? 
(it looks awful, I think)

I don't think it looks awfull , it fits the general wiki style ... 
only if heading would be bold or something ... but I don't have any 
exp. with wiki syntax for tables  ... you have few CSS examples of 
fancy tables here

I can't wait to read it as I already said like your articles a lot 
and parse vs re interests me a lot.. I just nee to find some peacefull 
time to zone it

zone it = zone in

PeterWood, that string encoding doc and functions look very useful. 
Nice work.

Thanks, Gregg. BTW, sorry for discussing in Announce, my bad.

When I see that "Very simple. Easy to debug. " in the http://www.rebol.net/wiki/Inclusion_Methods
, I am quite confused about the meaning. What is it that is easy 
to debug? (the DO function?)

It perhaps makes sense if you consider what errors you could possibly 
make coding using DO:
	incorrectly spell do
	miss the % from a filename
	omit the REBOL header from a script file
	do an unset word


I guess you could consider debugging those errors as being easy -- 
though I'm sure you can think of many more possible errors with the 
DO function than I :-)

On a quick look at the wiki page, the question "why do modules have 
to be dynamically loaded?" seems to jump out of the page.

hmm, but when I consider, that every build is actually ad hoc, then 
it means, that you have to debug many times, while in case of a standard 
method you just debug the method, not ad hoc script/s

so "easy to debug" versus "no debug"

Do you not think that it is more a case of either "debugging the 
ad-hoc script" or "debugging the input to the standard method"?  
In the sense of debugging either a shell script to compile and link 
a C program or a makefile.