r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group

eFishAnt
16-Mar-2005
[322]
blocks
 of data ? ;-)
Maxim
17-Mar-2005
[323x2]
eFishAnt, where is this spreadsheet contest described?
my scrollable 300000 cell table face might be easy to adapt...  ;-)
Graham
17-Mar-2005
[325x3]
Brian, trim works in-situ
battery-file: to-file join battery-dir [ battery "state" ]

seems incorrect
copy value to end (trim value)


I always have problems with these types of statements in real world 
data, cause if 'value becomes none, then 'trim will throw a wobbly
Anton
17-Mar-2005
[328x2]
all [value trim value]
Oh I see what you're talking about. Yes, nice article, Brian. :) 
That must be very helpful documentation for beginners.
BrianW
17-Mar-2005
[330x2]
Thanks. From a beginner, for beginners :-)
Graham - What is a better way to create the battery-file filename?
eFishAnt
17-Mar-2005
[332]
Maxim: Spreadsheet  and/or Announce....just make a spreadsheet for 
nano-sheets.r from article, and winner gets $50 prize.
Graham
17-Mar-2005
[333]
Brian, my first take on this was that [ battery ... ] would not be 
evaluated , but I see it is.
BrianW
17-Mar-2005
[334]
I think if I were to rewrite I would use 'rejoin instead.


Still, it's sort of a marker of my knowledge right now. I want to 
let it simmer for a bit before I go in and start trouching it up.
Graham
17-Mar-2005
[335]
well, if you did this

battery-file: join battery-dir join battery "state"

you wouldn't need the 'to-file
BrianW
17-Mar-2005
[336]
Actually, I don't think I need 'to-file in the first place.
Graham
17-Mar-2005
[337]
also, likewise with rejoin [ battery-dir battery "state" ]
BrianW
17-Mar-2005
[338x2]
Okay, i went ahead and changed "to-file join ..." to "rejoin [ ..."


Also threw in a little check for zero bit in calculating remaining 
time.
It'll go up in the next upload of the site.
Graham
20-Mar-2005
[340]
I think sound is now free in the free versions.
BrianW
20-Mar-2005
[341]
sound and call both are, aren't they? I'm not sure, so I just wanted 
to start with what I knew from rebol.com and the reboltalk forum
Graham
20-Mar-2005
[342x2]
not sure about 'call ...
RT should certainly get around to mentioning that these run on Windows 
XP, and not just 2000
Vincent
20-Mar-2005
[344]
'call is available from View 1.2.11, but I don't know if it's not 
just for beta-testing, and if it will be free in next official version
Graham
20-Mar-2005
[345x4]
and if you want 'call from core, you need r/command.
this page should give you that overview : http://www.rebol.com/purchase.html
I wonder if that upgrade price from View/Pro to SDK is correct.  
The price for View/Pro used to be $49, and perhaps they didn't reduce 
the upgrade price when they increased the price to $99...
odd pricing ... View/Pro ( $99) + upgrade to SDK ($199) = $298 + 
upgrade to command/sdk ($199) = $497

but start from Command ($349) + upgrade to command/sdk ($199) = $548

Looks like you're penalised if you start from R/Command.
BrianW
20-Mar-2005
[349]
Graham, the overview was mainly so I had a single page linking to 
documentation :-)
Graham
20-Mar-2005
[350]
http://www.rebol.com/purchase.htmlgives you links to datasheets 
on each product
BrianW
20-Mar-2005
[351x2]
I meant links to the docs (Library docs, Sound docs, call docs, encryption 
docs)
oy. Or I could have just scrolled down the page on http://www.rebol.com/docs-view.html

I am very silly sometimes.
Graham
27-Mar-2005
[353]
Volker, is that spell check different from the one on developer ?
Volker
27-Mar-2005
[354]
No, only more public.
Henrik
30-Mar-2005
[355x3]
ah... wonderful news to wake up to :-)
I heard somewhere that REBOL LNS takes up 24 kb of source code
is that true?
Pekr
30-Mar-2005
[358x2]
Well, I am not sure how well RT did their homework? ;-) Users asked 
to coordinate PR activity, LNS announced, /Coop only planned, no 
real stuff to try and links on announcement page are broken, oh my 
;-)
Well, I am not sure how well RT did their homework? ;-) Users asked 
to coordinate PR activity, LNS announced, /Coop only planned, no 
real stuff to try and links on announcement page are broken, oh my 
;-)
Henrik
30-Mar-2005
[360]
yeah, you can say that again :-)
Pekr
30-Mar-2005
[361]
posted in bold ... as I think about it, someone should try to call 
RT and notify them of broken links before Carl leaves on trip, or 
the announcement is not usable ...
Graham
30-Mar-2005
[362]
what broken link ?
Pekr
30-Mar-2005
[363x2]
all links ... on the left side ...
go to rebol.com announcement page ...
Graham
30-Mar-2005
[365]
Ahh... all in the wrong directory
Pekr
30-Mar-2005
[366]
If that will not be corrected it is "a bit" weird to spread announcement 
around ...
Graham
30-Mar-2005
[367]
I don't really understand why Carl can't stay connected no matter 
when he is ... it's just a question of either a laptop with roaming 
services, or, an internet cafe.  I see that the pages now have a 
[edit] link on the bottom too.
Gregg
30-Mar-2005
[368]
I imagine it's a "choice" to be offline. I know how *my* wife feels 
about things like that. :-)
Colin
30-Mar-2005
[369]
24 kb of source code?  Wow - thats technically very impressive, but 
it doesnt help in marketing when you compare a .NET install of 1 
CD or Visual Studio .NET 3CDs and about 40 minutes of effort. Perhaps 
RT needs to pad it out to give it that weight of credibility.
Henrik
30-Mar-2005
[370x2]
I don't know if it's true, I think I read it somewhere. I can't remember 
if it was here or somwhere else, but Carl did say something about 
the size of it
http://www.rebol.net/article/0127.html<--- the power of search