World: r3wp
[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group
older newer | first last |
eFishAnt 16-Mar-2005 [322] | blocks of data ? ;-) |
Maxim 17-Mar-2005 [323x2] | eFishAnt, where is this spreadsheet contest described? |
my scrollable 300000 cell table face might be easy to adapt... ;-) | |
Graham 17-Mar-2005 [325x3] | Brian, trim works in-situ |
battery-file: to-file join battery-dir [ battery "state" ] seems incorrect | |
copy value to end (trim value) I always have problems with these types of statements in real world data, cause if 'value becomes none, then 'trim will throw a wobbly | |
Anton 17-Mar-2005 [328x2] | all [value trim value] |
Oh I see what you're talking about. Yes, nice article, Brian. :) That must be very helpful documentation for beginners. | |
BrianW 17-Mar-2005 [330x2] | Thanks. From a beginner, for beginners :-) |
Graham - What is a better way to create the battery-file filename? | |
eFishAnt 17-Mar-2005 [332] | Maxim: Spreadsheet and/or Announce....just make a spreadsheet for nano-sheets.r from article, and winner gets $50 prize. |
Graham 17-Mar-2005 [333] | Brian, my first take on this was that [ battery ... ] would not be evaluated , but I see it is. |
BrianW 17-Mar-2005 [334] | I think if I were to rewrite I would use 'rejoin instead. Still, it's sort of a marker of my knowledge right now. I want to let it simmer for a bit before I go in and start trouching it up. |
Graham 17-Mar-2005 [335] | well, if you did this battery-file: join battery-dir join battery "state" you wouldn't need the 'to-file |
BrianW 17-Mar-2005 [336] | Actually, I don't think I need 'to-file in the first place. |
Graham 17-Mar-2005 [337] | also, likewise with rejoin [ battery-dir battery "state" ] |
BrianW 17-Mar-2005 [338x2] | Okay, i went ahead and changed "to-file join ..." to "rejoin [ ..." Also threw in a little check for zero bit in calculating remaining time. |
It'll go up in the next upload of the site. | |
Graham 20-Mar-2005 [340] | I think sound is now free in the free versions. |
BrianW 20-Mar-2005 [341] | sound and call both are, aren't they? I'm not sure, so I just wanted to start with what I knew from rebol.com and the reboltalk forum |
Graham 20-Mar-2005 [342x2] | not sure about 'call ... |
RT should certainly get around to mentioning that these run on Windows XP, and not just 2000 | |
Vincent 20-Mar-2005 [344] | 'call is available from View 1.2.11, but I don't know if it's not just for beta-testing, and if it will be free in next official version |
Graham 20-Mar-2005 [345x4] | and if you want 'call from core, you need r/command. |
this page should give you that overview : http://www.rebol.com/purchase.html | |
I wonder if that upgrade price from View/Pro to SDK is correct. The price for View/Pro used to be $49, and perhaps they didn't reduce the upgrade price when they increased the price to $99... | |
odd pricing ... View/Pro ( $99) + upgrade to SDK ($199) = $298 + upgrade to command/sdk ($199) = $497 but start from Command ($349) + upgrade to command/sdk ($199) = $548 Looks like you're penalised if you start from R/Command. | |
BrianW 20-Mar-2005 [349] | Graham, the overview was mainly so I had a single page linking to documentation :-) |
Graham 20-Mar-2005 [350] | http://www.rebol.com/purchase.htmlgives you links to datasheets on each product |
BrianW 20-Mar-2005 [351x2] | I meant links to the docs (Library docs, Sound docs, call docs, encryption docs) |
oy. Or I could have just scrolled down the page on http://www.rebol.com/docs-view.html I am very silly sometimes. | |
Graham 27-Mar-2005 [353] | Volker, is that spell check different from the one on developer ? |
Volker 27-Mar-2005 [354] | No, only more public. |
Henrik 30-Mar-2005 [355x3] | ah... wonderful news to wake up to :-) |
I heard somewhere that REBOL LNS takes up 24 kb of source code | |
is that true? | |
Pekr 30-Mar-2005 [358x2] | Well, I am not sure how well RT did their homework? ;-) Users asked to coordinate PR activity, LNS announced, /Coop only planned, no real stuff to try and links on announcement page are broken, oh my ;-) |
Well, I am not sure how well RT did their homework? ;-) Users asked to coordinate PR activity, LNS announced, /Coop only planned, no real stuff to try and links on announcement page are broken, oh my ;-) | |
Henrik 30-Mar-2005 [360] | yeah, you can say that again :-) |
Pekr 30-Mar-2005 [361] | posted in bold ... as I think about it, someone should try to call RT and notify them of broken links before Carl leaves on trip, or the announcement is not usable ... |
Graham 30-Mar-2005 [362] | what broken link ? |
Pekr 30-Mar-2005 [363x2] | all links ... on the left side ... |
go to rebol.com announcement page ... | |
Graham 30-Mar-2005 [365] | Ahh... all in the wrong directory |
Pekr 30-Mar-2005 [366] | If that will not be corrected it is "a bit" weird to spread announcement around ... |
Graham 30-Mar-2005 [367] | I don't really understand why Carl can't stay connected no matter when he is ... it's just a question of either a laptop with roaming services, or, an internet cafe. I see that the pages now have a [edit] link on the bottom too. |
Gregg 30-Mar-2005 [368] | I imagine it's a "choice" to be offline. I know how *my* wife feels about things like that. :-) |
Colin 30-Mar-2005 [369] | 24 kb of source code? Wow - thats technically very impressive, but it doesnt help in marketing when you compare a .NET install of 1 CD or Visual Studio .NET 3CDs and about 40 minutes of effort. Perhaps RT needs to pad it out to give it that weight of credibility. |
Henrik 30-Mar-2005 [370x2] | I don't know if it's true, I think I read it somewhere. I can't remember if it was here or somwhere else, but Carl did say something about the size of it |
http://www.rebol.net/article/0127.html<--- the power of search | |
older newer | first last |