r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group

BrianW
17-Mar-2005
[330x2]
Thanks. From a beginner, for beginners :-)
Graham - What is a better way to create the battery-file filename?
eFishAnt
17-Mar-2005
[332]
Maxim: Spreadsheet  and/or Announce....just make a spreadsheet for 
nano-sheets.r from article, and winner gets $50 prize.
Graham
17-Mar-2005
[333]
Brian, my first take on this was that [ battery ... ] would not be 
evaluated , but I see it is.
BrianW
17-Mar-2005
[334]
I think if I were to rewrite I would use 'rejoin instead.


Still, it's sort of a marker of my knowledge right now. I want to 
let it simmer for a bit before I go in and start trouching it up.
Graham
17-Mar-2005
[335]
well, if you did this

battery-file: join battery-dir join battery "state"

you wouldn't need the 'to-file
BrianW
17-Mar-2005
[336]
Actually, I don't think I need 'to-file in the first place.
Graham
17-Mar-2005
[337]
also, likewise with rejoin [ battery-dir battery "state" ]
BrianW
17-Mar-2005
[338x2]
Okay, i went ahead and changed "to-file join ..." to "rejoin [ ..."


Also threw in a little check for zero bit in calculating remaining 
time.
It'll go up in the next upload of the site.
Graham
20-Mar-2005
[340]
I think sound is now free in the free versions.
BrianW
20-Mar-2005
[341]
sound and call both are, aren't they? I'm not sure, so I just wanted 
to start with what I knew from rebol.com and the reboltalk forum
Graham
20-Mar-2005
[342x2]
not sure about 'call ...
RT should certainly get around to mentioning that these run on Windows 
XP, and not just 2000
Vincent
20-Mar-2005
[344]
'call is available from View 1.2.11, but I don't know if it's not 
just for beta-testing, and if it will be free in next official version
Graham
20-Mar-2005
[345x4]
and if you want 'call from core, you need r/command.
this page should give you that overview : http://www.rebol.com/purchase.html
I wonder if that upgrade price from View/Pro to SDK is correct.  
The price for View/Pro used to be $49, and perhaps they didn't reduce 
the upgrade price when they increased the price to $99...
odd pricing ... View/Pro ( $99) + upgrade to SDK ($199) = $298 + 
upgrade to command/sdk ($199) = $497

but start from Command ($349) + upgrade to command/sdk ($199) = $548

Looks like you're penalised if you start from R/Command.
BrianW
20-Mar-2005
[349]
Graham, the overview was mainly so I had a single page linking to 
documentation :-)
Graham
20-Mar-2005
[350]
http://www.rebol.com/purchase.htmlgives you links to datasheets 
on each product
BrianW
20-Mar-2005
[351x2]
I meant links to the docs (Library docs, Sound docs, call docs, encryption 
docs)
oy. Or I could have just scrolled down the page on http://www.rebol.com/docs-view.html

I am very silly sometimes.
Graham
27-Mar-2005
[353]
Volker, is that spell check different from the one on developer ?
Volker
27-Mar-2005
[354]
No, only more public.
Henrik
30-Mar-2005
[355x3]
ah... wonderful news to wake up to :-)
I heard somewhere that REBOL LNS takes up 24 kb of source code
is that true?
Pekr
30-Mar-2005
[358x2]
Well, I am not sure how well RT did their homework? ;-) Users asked 
to coordinate PR activity, LNS announced, /Coop only planned, no 
real stuff to try and links on announcement page are broken, oh my 
;-)
Well, I am not sure how well RT did their homework? ;-) Users asked 
to coordinate PR activity, LNS announced, /Coop only planned, no 
real stuff to try and links on announcement page are broken, oh my 
;-)
Henrik
30-Mar-2005
[360]
yeah, you can say that again :-)
Pekr
30-Mar-2005
[361]
posted in bold ... as I think about it, someone should try to call 
RT and notify them of broken links before Carl leaves on trip, or 
the announcement is not usable ...
Graham
30-Mar-2005
[362]
what broken link ?
Pekr
30-Mar-2005
[363x2]
all links ... on the left side ...
go to rebol.com announcement page ...
Graham
30-Mar-2005
[365]
Ahh... all in the wrong directory
Pekr
30-Mar-2005
[366]
If that will not be corrected it is "a bit" weird to spread announcement 
around ...
Graham
30-Mar-2005
[367]
I don't really understand why Carl can't stay connected no matter 
when he is ... it's just a question of either a laptop with roaming 
services, or, an internet cafe.  I see that the pages now have a 
[edit] link on the bottom too.
Gregg
30-Mar-2005
[368]
I imagine it's a "choice" to be offline. I know how *my* wife feels 
about things like that. :-)
Colin
30-Mar-2005
[369]
24 kb of source code?  Wow - thats technically very impressive, but 
it doesnt help in marketing when you compare a .NET install of 1 
CD or Visual Studio .NET 3CDs and about 40 minutes of effort. Perhaps 
RT needs to pad it out to give it that weight of credibility.
Henrik
30-Mar-2005
[370x4]
I don't know if it's true, I think I read it somewhere. I can't remember 
if it was here or somwhere else, but Carl did say something about 
the size of it
http://www.rebol.net/article/0127.html<--- the power of search
ah... well, it's only the client part. boo. :-)
colin, perhaps it would fit with a deployment scenario. compare installing 
visual studio in 40 minutes to just clicking an .exe file from a 
network share to install your rebol/services enabled source management 
client plus integrated texteditor in four seconds.
Chris
30-Mar-2005
[374]
Colin, sadly there may be some truth to what you say :o(
Henrik
30-Mar-2005
[375x2]
At least coders are very easy to persuade. I created a graphical 
Windows CD menu for a coder in about 10 minutes using Rebol/View 
and Payload from scratch. Before that, he had no idea if he'd need 
to use Visual Studio for that and spend a week on it. An argument 
here: "It allows you to get your job done."
that said, I did submit the news of REBOL LNS to a Danish newssite. 
Of course they ignored it.
Kaj
30-Mar-2005
[377]
Hm, our Syllable convention was reported on a Danish site, and it 
immediately spawned what I called an ABS movement (Anything But Syllable) 
in which every imaginable operating system was mentioned as an alternative, 
instead of responding to the subject. There could easily be an Anything 
But REBOL movement, as well...
Henrik
30-Mar-2005
[378]
that I would like to see, just for the fun of shooting it down, but 
the news editors didn't even promote my submission to a news item.
Kaj
30-Mar-2005
[379]
You can't shoot it down; it's not rational :-/