World: r3wp
[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group
older newer | first last |
Henrik 30-Mar-2005 [372x2] | ah... well, it's only the client part. boo. :-) |
colin, perhaps it would fit with a deployment scenario. compare installing visual studio in 40 minutes to just clicking an .exe file from a network share to install your rebol/services enabled source management client plus integrated texteditor in four seconds. | |
Chris 30-Mar-2005 [374] | Colin, sadly there may be some truth to what you say :o( |
Henrik 30-Mar-2005 [375x2] | At least coders are very easy to persuade. I created a graphical Windows CD menu for a coder in about 10 minutes using Rebol/View and Payload from scratch. Before that, he had no idea if he'd need to use Visual Studio for that and spend a week on it. An argument here: "It allows you to get your job done." |
that said, I did submit the news of REBOL LNS to a Danish newssite. Of course they ignored it. | |
Kaj 30-Mar-2005 [377] | Hm, our Syllable convention was reported on a Danish site, and it immediately spawned what I called an ABS movement (Anything But Syllable) in which every imaginable operating system was mentioned as an alternative, instead of responding to the subject. There could easily be an Anything But REBOL movement, as well... |
Henrik 30-Mar-2005 [378] | that I would like to see, just for the fun of shooting it down, but the news editors didn't even promote my submission to a news item. |
Kaj 30-Mar-2005 [379] | You can't shoot it down; it's not rational :-/ |
Colin 30-Mar-2005 [380] | Rebol is about the technology. Success or failure in the market is about the marketing. Marketing is about perception. People who make buy decisions are not technically in the know, so its a percption game. Even if the facts fly in the face of what they espouse to be right, they will fall back to the idea that "the bigger the better". You have to counter that concept and still not have the technology written off as a "nice trick" or "toy technology". |
Pekr 30-Mar-2005 [381x2] | guys, that is completly unrealistic as 1) RT's site simply sucks 2) Announcement page contains broken links 3) It is still kind of vaporware announcement like Amiga Inc. did and bad habit of RT - announcing things BEFORE they are ready 4) if it would be ready, there should be some thought out code/service examples on-line, with real-life functionality exposed, so actually ppl could try something usefull 5) What is Scot doing as marketing manager if the position still exists? RT just can't mean it that way, right? Producing ultra cool sw will not help you, if not marketed properly, at least here in Europe |
I am sorry to post in bold, but I feel so strong about my opinion, that I simply want it being noticed here ... | |
Henrik 30-Mar-2005 [383] | has anyone seen any articles about LNS on any news sites by now? |
Pekr 30-Mar-2005 [384x2] | no, as Carl said he leaves for a trip and asked us to do so ;-) |
I mean - to spread a word ... | |
Henrik 30-Mar-2005 [386] | I would have thought it'd be on OSNews by now |
Pekr 30-Mar-2005 [387x2] | OSNews? They are somehow ignorant. I personally sent Eugenia Czech security expert achievment, where he compromited MD5 even further, but they did not report it ... |
And as I said - some real service example should be provided - as someone mentioned in other channel - why not to wrap just simple "Hello word"? | |
JaimeVargas 30-Mar-2005 [389] | Pekr regarding announcements I think you are right. Thats what happen to the osx/view version almost 2 years ago. |
Henrik 30-Mar-2005 [390] | I agree on this. it would be wiser to wait until we can show screenshots of REBOL/Coop, even if it only would be 3 weeks away |
Pekr 30-Mar-2005 [391x2] | and language components - do you remember? It was there just to distract ppl from R# back at that time imo, it was even removed rom announcement page later ;-) |
rom=from | |
Colin 30-Mar-2005 [393] | Agree totally Pekr. This altme world is about technical achievements and possibilities of Rebol. No debate about how good it can be, but there isn't any cohesive marketing going on. No blogging, no search engine strategies, no PR announcements to the right people, a dearth of both Rebol powered products and even the experts are crying out for some basic stuff to be fixed. My guess is that even the rebol evangelists use it as "secret weapon" so that they don't get told to put their toys away and get back to real languages like C++ or Java. [off soapbox] |
[unknown: 10] 30-Mar-2005 [394] | Pekr, what is proper marketing? Its a very difficult issue.. but you know that i assume.. I dont know what the difference is between europe and the rest of the world but I do know that it succes depends for 90% on "Accepted Vision of the product!" by the public (Public can be anything..) One thing is sure , Rebol is still its time ahead with many things and thats a disadvantage currently because of the mis-intepreted use of Rebol by the rest of the world. (thats what i think). Still i think the RT is overflowed by exciting and needed to publish towards the community "some" release. But i could be very wrong here as well because i only observe Rebol marketing from a birdview.. |
Pekr 30-Mar-2005 [395x2] | Rebolinth - all true. But release to the community should not apper on the website. TLA was not consulted. Carl could easily told us his choice and let us check. Now Ladislav posted link, which could make alredy announced TLA unusable ... |
proper marketing - I too don't know what to do exactly, but I do know, that such things do take time. I would start defining - WHAT I want to say, to WHO I want to say it, and I woudl start with new website ... | |
Colin 30-Mar-2005 [397] | What is "proper Marketing" - here is a hint. All the Rebol sites turn up top positions in google when you look for "rebol". Problem is nobody is really looking for "rebol". |
[unknown: 10] 30-Mar-2005 [398x4] | Yes you are right, though i think Carl or RT had a special meaning with it.. Im not sure what but it even could be used for money founders, or prerelease of even more software?... |
Colin i think that Rebol RT does not want to market Rebol as a software development tool but rather in a broughter picture as a environment.. Thats something a lot of Internet users/developers dont even know yet.. | |
So they market is right but people dont see it ;-) | |
that may sound strange though ;-) | |
Colin 30-Mar-2005 [402] | Well if you cant tell me in 25 words or less just what RT is selling, how successful do you think their marketing efforts have been. |
[unknown: 10] 30-Mar-2005 [403x2] | For me in person? Then, RT is selling me a construction with vision and future. For the rest of the world i would not know.. But what i do know is that it could take 10 more years befor the Name "Rebol" pops up where it should. Thats not a marketing issue that an evolution.. how unfortunatly that might be.. |
but we have time ;-) | |
yeksoon 30-Mar-2005 [405] | my attempt on RT elevator speech. less than 20 words version RT develops the language Rebol, a messaging language which makes distributed computing easier across devices |
Sunanda 30-Mar-2005 [406] | Colin -- "Problem is nobody is really looking for "rebol"." That's true -- they are looking for solutions to problems. It is possible for our websites to rank highly in all sorts of areas. For example, in the last three days people have found REBOL.org because it ranks in the top 10 for Google for these phrases: -- hex to integer converter -- gui maker -- html script calendar notes -- script library -- parsing html links I suggested a year or so back (REBOL world, Advocacy, I think) that REBOL wevbsite owners could collaberate to help these sorts of rankings. Still true. |
Colin 30-Mar-2005 [407] | Well thats good. So now you reverse that it determine what key words someone would search for so that Rebol websites would pop up. Some how I don't think you'd look for "vision" or "ahead of its time", but you would want to zero in on "rapid development multi or cross platform development internet protocols messaging " etc ... and start feeding the Search engines these sites linked to these words. If you go to rebol.com and do a "view source" see how many hits you get on those words. |
Sunanda 30-Mar-2005 [408] | Yep. We need to get better for the things they are finding us for....including having more solid content. Plus help them find us for other things. REBOLcom is No1 for: -- Internet messaging ...But the content needs improving |
Colin 30-Mar-2005 [409] | Sunanda - those a good points. So search the rebol web server log and see what the key words were that got hits from the SE. Start building pages that maximize those key words, have links back to your main Rebol sites and feed the SE with these links. Its an interative process that takes time and effort. At the moment all we see is time being spent. |
Sunanda 30-Mar-2005 [410] | That's the way I do it in other fields. Plus think a bit wider -- there must be a market for people who want something better/differemt to Perl or PHP etc. We don't have the appropriate comparison/conversion documents. Not marketing rah-rah about REBOL, but some straight-forrward comparsions that show strengths and weaknesses. Maybe we should swicth to Advocacy..... |
Colin 30-Mar-2005 [411] | go |
[unknown: 10] 30-Mar-2005 [412x3] | A marketing strategy is not based on issues like "Promotion via Google or Webpages" Though its indeed 5% of it... |
You need to convince the Core problem! | |
its like i.e. "reverse enginering"... | |
Colin 30-Mar-2005 [415] | But surely one of its strength is in dealing with internet protocols and thats where most people look for solutions in this field. What is the Core problem? |
[unknown: 10] 30-Mar-2005 [416x2] | In my opinion the "core" are the conservatives... Those who stick with what they have and know and dont risk a change because its too expencive on their budget/knowledge... |
I.e. the problem with introducing REBOL into a BIG software development compagny is that the developers are always willing to try a change! but the total package of moving from 1 development enviroment to the other is far to complicated and expensive to do it.. So they stick with what "others" use and do, without thinking through the whole picture.. Its a pitty but a fact though.. Still if a development compagny would start directly (or on a new project) with i.e. REBOL the change that it will have success if far greater. Well....getting to that stage is difficult because REBOL is unknown... Its like "air" to the people, so you have to put time into it.. (There is no time inside big compagnies..there is only time in technology enhanced compagny's that do research. So you miss a market...) Anyway a nice topic which keeps me sometimes thinking about "Who promoted the Wheel.. ;-)" It was an evolution... And indeed Internet promotion is part of this evolution so please continue ;-) | |
BrianW 30-Mar-2005 [418x2] | I don't know what they are selling to the world, either. I do know that what RT sold me is a network-aware glue language useful for streamlining my work tasks. |
... at least, those are the features that encouraged me to spend money on it :-) | |
Henrik 31-Mar-2005 [420] | oh, now they accepted my news item. two very positive comments, one with the word "incredible" in it :-) |
Graham 31-Mar-2005 [421] | URI ? |
older newer | first last |