r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group

[unknown: 9]
15-Dec-2005
[780]
Huge script (but remember, it has to include all media)
Rebolek
15-Dec-2005
[781]
but can it be compressed with COMPRESS ?
[unknown: 9]
15-Dec-2005
[782x2]
Sure.  I would not respect anyone that did not!
(My actual specialty happens to be compression technologies)
Carl
15-Dec-2005
[784x3]
Good suggestions. Nice color too.
All sounds good, with exception of the XBox prize. I heard "things" 
about the company that makes it. ;)
I could suggest a MacMini (but then the winner also gets to finish 
porting REBOL to it).
[unknown: 9]
15-Dec-2005
[787]
LOL
BrianH
15-Dec-2005
[788]
No problem :)
Izkata
15-Dec-2005
[789]
Kru - I was referring to how complex they look while running, not 
the size (or actual complexity) of the code
^_^
Allen
15-Dec-2005
[790]
A few rebol promo items like t-shirts should be in the mix too.
[unknown: 9]
15-Dec-2005
[791x2]
Agreed.
I have original Rebol flags (desktop size).  I will throw one in 
to the 4rth and 5th place winners. : )
Volker
16-Dec-2005
[793x5]
If its a mac mini i learn graphics..
I would use seperate sizes for media and script. script maybe 8k? 
its a demo, and a month. media should be more. because one feature 
is, take a photo and do crazy things with it. a photo in 32k is not 
much. a script of 32k takes some month work (its a demo, so it should 
be "this does in 32k what others do in 32k*8, and that kind of compression 
takes time)
How about not only graphics demos, but networking too? Once there 
was a contest for a mud (text-moorg) in 16k, and some entries where 
playable and interesting they said.
And there should be multiple levels, best guru, best beginner, so 
students have more hope. (and i am a graphics-beginner, so - Ha! 
;)
how about word-length? if size is limited, demos become: insert d 
a: b + c. a low limit, medium length 3-5 chars?
BrianH
16-Dec-2005
[798]
Compress should deal with word length.
Volker
16-Dec-2005
[799x2]
good point.
How about an old good amiga too? Or this newer one, (genesis?)
[unknown: 9]
16-Dec-2005
[801]
I vote keep it simple, and based on the feedback of this one, we 
step it up a notch next year, which can be the day after if we get 
our asses in gear and post this ASAP! LOL
Volker
16-Dec-2005
[802]
Gel is 1346 bytes and the images 25k
Rebolek
16-Dec-2005
[803]
I think 32kB all together is good. Remember that some Amiga demos 
were only 4kB with sound and graphics!
Volker
16-Dec-2005
[804]
if i trade 8 k in resolution for 8k in script-size i double my script-size. 
i do not like that.
Rebolek
16-Dec-2005
[805]
If I remember correctly, demo categories were 4k, 64k and mega-demo 
(unlimited size). Maybe for next demo contest we can have  these 
categories but this year I prefer to stick with 32k. I wonder if 
rebcode can be used or not. Although I love rebcode, it's still only 
in alpha, so it seems to be more fair when rebcode is not allowed.
Cyphre
16-Dec-2005
[806]
Not sure If anyone mentioned it. THe demoshould run on View 1.3.2 
so NO rebcode...(this is confirmed by Carl)
Rebolek
16-Dec-2005
[807]
OK, so 1) Is there a web site set up for the RDC yet? 2) The deadline 
is 31-12/11:59:59. Is it GMT? 3) I hope that 32kB limitaion is final. 
Is that true? 3) Will the submited demos be available publicly before 
deadline? (I vote no). Hm, I've got only 14 days left. I should better 
hurry up ;)
yeksoon
16-Dec-2005
[808]
I think that is the beauty of this challenge.


How little time (and code) allows u to create something wonderful..
[unknown: 9]
16-Dec-2005
[809]
Deadline should be GMT = 0!  As in England.

I agree demos can't be seen before deadline, but  we can post past 
demos.

I'm going to try to work with Carl to buld a clear page (on Rebol.com 
I hope).
Allen
16-Dec-2005
[810]
I liked idea of a an ongoing weekly comp.. like back in 1999 http://web.archive.org/web/19991013041056/rebol.com/contest.html
. Haven't found the how to enter page though.
Josh
16-Dec-2005
[811]
Agreed, Allen
Graham
16-Dec-2005
[812x6]
I think there are better things we can do with our time.
Gregg's response to the OSX widgets thread on the maling list suggests 
another possibility.
If RT were to create a dashboard, the community could create the 
widgets for this .. either as a weekly or monthly competition.
we would have to have some security guides as to what we can do, 
and for safetely RT could host the accepted widgets.
This would be a much more useful activity that demos that only provide 
eye candy.
Achieve both aims in one go.
Rebolek
16-Dec-2005
[818]
I think RDC should be announced on ML as well. But by someone more 
official than me :)
Graham
16-Dec-2005
[819x2]
In essence the dashboard could be a custom version of the Rebol Desktop.
It sounds very much to me, or hasn't used Konfabulator etc, that 
is what it is anyway.
PhilB
16-Dec-2005
[821]
There is typo on the Rebol License page (mentioned is one of Carl's 
blogs ....) .... under the section for Rebol IOS , the text says 
Rebol/SDK is not free, rather that Rebol/IOS is not free..
Terry
17-Dec-2005
[822]
Can the demo be OS specific?
[unknown: 9]
17-Dec-2005
[823]
I would vote note.
Volker
18-Dec-2005
[824]
What means os-specific? Only windows has agg-fonts, which is cool 
for demos. And mac-alpha lacks even timers.
Terry
18-Dec-2005
[825]
well, there ya go then.
Rebolek
18-Dec-2005
[826]
When only windows version of 1.3.2 has font support in AGG, is it 
considered as an OS specific feature? I hope not.
Pekr
18-Dec-2005
[827x3]
Kru - imo os-specific feature is the one, which will not allow your 
script to run on other platforms without change ...
so - if your script will run under both linux and windows, and just 
windows will look somehow prettier, than it should be tolerated. 
But e.g. OS-X still lacking timers is imo disqulifying OS-X version 
pretty much ...
btw - what is the status of OS-X version? IIRC it was high on priority 
list and it is long time since View was released last time. Is that 
so big problem to not implement timers for OS-X in half a year or 
how long it is since View release? ;-)