World: r3wp
[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group
older newer | first last |
Anton 26-Feb-2005 [80] | Mmm.. looks like I'm just going to have to read-thru that link... |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [81x2] | ... we need another, probably speech free separate community server, where ppl meet not only because of rebol, but because they want to ... |
I somehow fear, that if this server would follow Gregg's rules - "keep ti Rebol related" only, it would die of non communication ... | |
Terry 26-Feb-2005 [83x3] | Just a comment regarding Gregg's last announcement... your point is much clearer, thank you... however, I tend to disagree.. and here's why.. Since the beginning of February, 94 different Rebols (which some call Rebolers) have visited this world. I would say that the 80/20 rule would be fairly accurate, where 80% of the posts are made by 20% of the community. I'm not exactly sure what the exact percentages would be, but I would say that well over half rarely, if ever, say a word. I would like to hear from a few more of these folks .. about anything.. who are they?.. what do they do? And if some Rebol chat comes from that.. all the better. I'd like to see an eagerness to participate at whatever level. People are drawn here because of a common interest.. Rebol. But what keeps them coming back? Is it the pure Rebol conversations? I don't think so. If that were the case, then where is the Rebol-view world? That used to be the main hang out? I for one, stopped going there because it became dry, old, boring and censored. I preferred this world because it DIDN'T have the rules.. the conversations were much more free and engaging.. both Rebol and non-Rebol. I've found the business / marketing discussions particularily interesting. The 'debates' on evolution vs. creation have been stimulating TO ME... maybe not to you. Rebol needs all the community it can get. I would make few f any 'rules', (other than the obvious). If you want pure Rebol, then fire-up Rebol-view and have at it.. But if "this is not our world", then what the hell am I doing here? My online community is where I touch base to see whether I'm on the right track, where I get support and advice, and where I learn and teach. In the eyes of its many users, online communication is a powerful medium for like-minded individuals to form virtual communities that provide mutual support, advice and identity. Communications networks offer the prospect of greater opportunities for seeking advice, challenging orthodoxy, meeting new minds and constructing one's own sense of self. Entirely new notions of social action, based not upon proximity and shared physical experience but rather on remote networks of common perceptions, may begin to emerge and challenge existing social structures (Loader, 1998). |
The spirit of community is essential to the vitality of virtual communities. What holds a virtual community intact is the subjective criterion of togetherness, a feeling of connectedness that confers a sense of belonging. Virtual communities require much more than the mere act of connection itself (Foster, 1996). | |
(Graham- as much as you may hate quotes outside of the 'quotes' group, 'try and restrain yourself!') | |
Charles 26-Feb-2005 [86x2] | I read this posts. They're interessants. I like them. But, as a reader, I don't post to tell that. So, if I follow the rules, Terry don't post anymore, because he post more than 2 post on the same subject... Sad. very sad. I like reading terry's posts, IA, natural language, and so on... But I didn't post. |
This world is not in my mail-reader, it's an executable, I have to launch it to view, read, and write... I really think that if I have good time on this world, if I can meet some friends, and read some interessant subject, then I'm going to connect often and often, read more, and participate more. If it doesn't, then I forgot this world, and I connect only if someone tell me about something in this world (or if I time to spend). | |
shadwolf 26-Feb-2005 [88] | sure how to increase rebol knowledge without using this wonderfull tool that is altme ... Maybe it has to be improved to fixsome hudge bugs ..but it doesn't evolve so we are obligated to limit our interventions |
Geomol 26-Feb-2005 [89] | RebXML The way by using a slash to define an empty element doesn't seem to work with the official release of REBOL/View version 1.2.1. I use rvdraw57e.exe, and here it works. |
Ashley 26-Feb-2005 [90x2] | mdViewer - Thanks for all the feedback (both public and private) guys - Sunanda: 'stats - missed that one; system/stats should fix it - shadwolf: MD2-IDE was the VID proto-type; mdViewer is the *real* View implementation (i.e. I won't radically change the render engine on you again ;) ) |
Quick comment in support of Gregg's last announcement: I've tried introducing a number of folks to REBOL/AltME, and they were deterred from using it because of the high amount of noise and the feeling that they were "intruding" on a series of private conversations. So my feeling on the matter is that wide ranging discussions are all well and fine for folks who are *already* here but could deter some folks who come to the REBOL world thinking it might be a purely technical / support forum. | |
Izkata 26-Feb-2005 [92] | Perhaps some worldmaster dividers to separate chatter from technical stuff would help without really changing much? |
eFishAnt 26-Feb-2005 [93] | Agree, Ashley. I would never bring someone to this world to turn them on to REBOL I have other places set up to do that. |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [94x2] | Ashley - but that is contrary to what some of us think. What Gregg proposed was further isolation of free speach. |
I would never think of this world as of support only forum. And if someone thinks that average reboller is kind of robot adhered to rebol only topics, I may be living some other planet then and I may think of leaving this world alltogether ... | |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [96] | where will you go to ? |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [97] | nowhere |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [98x2] | hehe |
a nowhere threat | |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [100x2] | Do you think that I need to be present on forum, where I am accused of some adhering to rules, because someone just thinks that something gone wrong? |
I will not buy such crap as that this world consumes some bandwidth | |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [102] | there aren't many viable alternatives for rebol + misc chat |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [103] | what are custom groups for then? Reichart said it right - we can have private groups. I am OK with what e.g. Terry is all about here. No problem on my side. I don't need to read it, if I don't want to. We can go to some private group if we wish to. |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [104] | flaws in Altme's design is part of the problem |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [105x2] | Graham - I don't care - but who gave Gregg the right to try to correct our behavior here? |
I don't care and I don't talk about Altme flaw here | |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [107] | I suspect he has been asked to do the dirty work ... part of the world master job description |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [108x2] | I talk about repetitive attitude of Gregg of trying to normalize our speach here |
If so, I will not be here ... enjoy your world here then | |
Ammon 26-Feb-2005 [110] | Perhaps we could create a group with a list of the off topic groups, their respective descriptions and moderators. If someone is interested in an off topic group then they can apply for membership to the moderator of the group. |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [111] | Or, we can move off topic chat to rebol-world, and use this world just for tech support |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [112x2] | In my opinion, all that stuff is plain nonsense. I lived 6 long years on IRC forums. Although there were OPs, I never seen something like that |
I will move to rebol-world then | |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [114] | never going to please everyone .. and since there are no real moderation mechanisms .. there are always going to be problems |
Ammon 26-Feb-2005 [115] | This would allow those of us who like an odd discussion now and then to be able to see the "off topic" groups and join or not as we choose. |
Tomc 26-Feb-2005 [116] | I would suspect Gregg is acting on his own and no one I have met at RT would ask anybody to do their dirty work |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [117] | I can't see Greggs reactions as consistent. I think that such discussions are self-regulatory. Once there is new development (e.g. View 1.3), ppl will automatically keep the topic. But once there is nearly nothing happening, I can see no reason why to limit whatever topic discussion out ... |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [118] | yeah .. nothing is happening again, and so .. idle hands do the work of the devil |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [119x2] | I am free to talk whatever topic with Terry even if I know that he has diametrically different understanding of religion, whatever |
I think that "almost dead" world is worse than world keeping ppl to even the most stuping topic you could imagine ;-) | |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [121] | Gregg is on dial up .. I guess dial up users get annoyed when after the syncing they do, all they find is alt.religion ! |
Tomc 26-Feb-2005 [122] | that wouls do it |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [123] | I am on GPRS at work, slower than dial-up actually, and never found a problem with Altme ;-) |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [124] | does altme sync groups you opt out of .. I wonder ... |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [125] | not sure, I never opted myself out of some group ... |
Brock 26-Feb-2005 [126] | Any conversation in the world in my opinion is a good thing. It keeps me coming back knowing that the regulars are around throughout the day. Sometimes there is a gem, sometimes off topic chat. But I know someone is here. If I have a question, I know people will see it if placed in the proper group. |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [127] | a static world is death .. like an unchanging website |
Brock 26-Feb-2005 [128x2] | For instance, two questions today for Ammon re: his drop-down.r - both answered within minutes. Other Rebol related questions go no longer than a day if it is general enough. That is VALUE. |
Exactly/ | |
older newer | first last |