r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group

Charles
26-Feb-2005
[86x2]
I read this posts. They're interessants. I like them. But, as a reader, 
I don't post to tell that. So, if I follow the rules, Terry don't 
post anymore, because he post more than 2 post on the same subject... 
Sad. very sad. I like reading terry's posts, IA, natural language, 
and so on... But I didn't post.
This world is not in my mail-reader, it's an executable, I have to 
launch it to view, read, and write... I really think that if I have 
good time on this world, if I can meet some friends, and read some 
interessant subject, then I'm going to connect often and often, read 
more, and participate more. If it doesn't, then I forgot this world, 
and I connect only if someone tell me about something in this world 
(or if I time to spend).
shadwolf
26-Feb-2005
[88]
sure how to increase rebol knowledge without using this wonderfull 
tool that is altme ... Maybe it has to be improved to fixsome hudge 
bugs ..but it doesn't evolve so we are obligated to limit our interventions
Geomol
26-Feb-2005
[89]
RebXML

The way by using a slash to define an empty element doesn't seem 
to work with the official release of REBOL/View version 1.2.1. I 
use rvdraw57e.exe, and here it works.
Ashley
26-Feb-2005
[90x2]
mdViewer

- Thanks for all the feedback (both public and private) guys
- Sunanda: 'stats - missed that one; system/stats should fix it

- shadwolf: MD2-IDE was the VID proto-type; mdViewer is the *real* 
View implementation (i.e. I won't radically change the render engine 
on you again ;) )
Quick comment in support of Gregg's last announcement: I've tried 
introducing a number of folks to REBOL/AltME, and they were deterred 
from using it because of the high amount of noise and the feeling 
that they were "intruding" on a series of private conversations. 
So my feeling on the matter is that wide ranging discussions are 
all well and fine for folks who are *already* here but could deter 
some folks who come to the REBOL world thinking it might be a purely 
technical / support forum.
Izkata
26-Feb-2005
[92]
Perhaps some worldmaster dividers to separate chatter from technical 
stuff would help without really changing much?
eFishAnt
26-Feb-2005
[93]
Agree, Ashley.  I would never bring someone to this world to turn 
them on to REBOL  I have other places set up to do that.
Pekr
26-Feb-2005
[94x2]
Ashley - but that is contrary to what some of us think. What Gregg 
proposed was further isolation of free speach.
I would never think of this world as of support only forum. And if 
someone thinks that average reboller is kind of robot adhered to 
rebol only topics, I may be living some other planet then and I may 
think of leaving this world alltogether ...
Graham
26-Feb-2005
[96]
where will you go to ?
Pekr
26-Feb-2005
[97]
nowhere
Graham
26-Feb-2005
[98x2]
hehe
a nowhere threat
Pekr
26-Feb-2005
[100x2]
Do you think that I need to be present on forum, where I am accused 
of some adhering to rules, because someone just thinks that something 
gone wrong?
I will not buy such crap as that this world consumes some bandwidth
Graham
26-Feb-2005
[102]
there aren't many viable alternatives for rebol + misc chat
Pekr
26-Feb-2005
[103]
what are custom groups for then? Reichart said it right - we can 
have private groups. I am OK with what e.g. Terry is all about here. 
No problem on my side. I don't need to read it, if I don't want to. 
We can go to some private group if we wish to.
Graham
26-Feb-2005
[104]
flaws in Altme's design is part of the problem
Pekr
26-Feb-2005
[105x2]
Graham - I don't care - but who gave Gregg the right to try to correct 
our behavior here?
I don't care and I don't talk about Altme flaw here
Graham
26-Feb-2005
[107]
I suspect he has been asked to do the dirty work ... part of the 
world master job description
Pekr
26-Feb-2005
[108x2]
I talk about repetitive attitude of Gregg of trying to normalize 
our speach here
If so, I will not be here ... enjoy your world here then
Ammon
26-Feb-2005
[110]
Perhaps we could create a group with a list of the off topic groups, 
their respective descriptions and moderators.  If someone is interested 
in an off topic group then they can apply for membership to the moderator 
of the group.
Graham
26-Feb-2005
[111]
Or, we can move off topic chat to rebol-world, and use this world 
just for tech support
Pekr
26-Feb-2005
[112x2]
In my opinion, all that stuff is plain nonsense. I lived 6 long years 
on IRC forums. Although there were OPs, I never seen something like 
that
I will move to rebol-world then
Graham
26-Feb-2005
[114]
never going to please everyone .. and since there are no real moderation 
mechanisms .. there are always going to be problems
Ammon
26-Feb-2005
[115]
This would allow those of us who like an odd discussion now and then 
to be able to see the "off topic" groups and join or not as we choose.
Tomc
26-Feb-2005
[116]
I would suspect Gregg is acting on his own and no one I have met 
at RT would ask anybody to do their dirty work
Pekr
26-Feb-2005
[117]
I can't see Greggs reactions as consistent. I think that such discussions 
are self-regulatory. Once there is new development (e.g. View 1.3), 
ppl will automatically keep the topic. But once there is nearly nothing 
happening, I can see no reason why to limit whatever topic discussion 
out ...
Graham
26-Feb-2005
[118]
yeah .. nothing is happening again, and so .. idle hands do the work 
of the devil
Pekr
26-Feb-2005
[119x2]
I am free to talk whatever topic with Terry even if I know that he 
has diametrically different understanding of religion, whatever
I think that "almost dead" world is worse than world keeping ppl 
to even the most stuping topic you could imagine ;-)
Graham
26-Feb-2005
[121]
Gregg is on dial up .. I guess dial up users get annoyed when after 
the syncing they do, all they find is alt.religion !
Tomc
26-Feb-2005
[122]
that wouls do it
Pekr
26-Feb-2005
[123]
I am on GPRS at work, slower than dial-up actually, and never found 
a problem with Altme ;-)
Graham
26-Feb-2005
[124]
does altme sync groups you opt out of .. I wonder ...
Pekr
26-Feb-2005
[125]
not sure, I never opted myself out of some group ...
Brock
26-Feb-2005
[126]
Any conversation in the world in my opinion is a good thing.  It 
keeps me coming back knowing that the regulars are around throughout 
the day.  Sometimes there is a gem, sometimes off topic chat.  But 
I know someone is here.  If I have a question, I know people will 
see it if placed in the proper group.
Graham
26-Feb-2005
[127]
a static world is death .. like an unchanging website
Brock
26-Feb-2005
[128x2]
For instance, two questions today for Ammon re: his drop-down.r - 
both answered within minutes.  Other Rebol related questions go no 
longer than a day if it is general enough.  That is VALUE.
Exactly/
Graham
26-Feb-2005
[130]
and the cost is .. some noise
Brock
26-Feb-2005
[131x2]
x-internet noise  ;)
(very low bandwidth)
Graham
26-Feb-2005
[133]
I've never heard Carl ask us to keep to rebol topics .. so if we 
stick to the topic no one should really have much to complain about
Brock
26-Feb-2005
[134]
All RT related topics for user help etc are already in REBOL group. 
 The others are obviously not specific to Rebol.
Terry
26-Feb-2005
[135]
I thought the ML was the technical / support forum?