World: r3wp
[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group
older newer | first last |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [99] | a nowhere threat |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [100x2] | Do you think that I need to be present on forum, where I am accused of some adhering to rules, because someone just thinks that something gone wrong? |
I will not buy such crap as that this world consumes some bandwidth | |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [102] | there aren't many viable alternatives for rebol + misc chat |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [103] | what are custom groups for then? Reichart said it right - we can have private groups. I am OK with what e.g. Terry is all about here. No problem on my side. I don't need to read it, if I don't want to. We can go to some private group if we wish to. |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [104] | flaws in Altme's design is part of the problem |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [105x2] | Graham - I don't care - but who gave Gregg the right to try to correct our behavior here? |
I don't care and I don't talk about Altme flaw here | |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [107] | I suspect he has been asked to do the dirty work ... part of the world master job description |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [108x2] | I talk about repetitive attitude of Gregg of trying to normalize our speach here |
If so, I will not be here ... enjoy your world here then | |
Ammon 26-Feb-2005 [110] | Perhaps we could create a group with a list of the off topic groups, their respective descriptions and moderators. If someone is interested in an off topic group then they can apply for membership to the moderator of the group. |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [111] | Or, we can move off topic chat to rebol-world, and use this world just for tech support |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [112x2] | In my opinion, all that stuff is plain nonsense. I lived 6 long years on IRC forums. Although there were OPs, I never seen something like that |
I will move to rebol-world then | |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [114] | never going to please everyone .. and since there are no real moderation mechanisms .. there are always going to be problems |
Ammon 26-Feb-2005 [115] | This would allow those of us who like an odd discussion now and then to be able to see the "off topic" groups and join or not as we choose. |
Tomc 26-Feb-2005 [116] | I would suspect Gregg is acting on his own and no one I have met at RT would ask anybody to do their dirty work |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [117] | I can't see Greggs reactions as consistent. I think that such discussions are self-regulatory. Once there is new development (e.g. View 1.3), ppl will automatically keep the topic. But once there is nearly nothing happening, I can see no reason why to limit whatever topic discussion out ... |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [118] | yeah .. nothing is happening again, and so .. idle hands do the work of the devil |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [119x2] | I am free to talk whatever topic with Terry even if I know that he has diametrically different understanding of religion, whatever |
I think that "almost dead" world is worse than world keeping ppl to even the most stuping topic you could imagine ;-) | |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [121] | Gregg is on dial up .. I guess dial up users get annoyed when after the syncing they do, all they find is alt.religion ! |
Tomc 26-Feb-2005 [122] | that wouls do it |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [123] | I am on GPRS at work, slower than dial-up actually, and never found a problem with Altme ;-) |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [124] | does altme sync groups you opt out of .. I wonder ... |
Pekr 26-Feb-2005 [125] | not sure, I never opted myself out of some group ... |
Brock 26-Feb-2005 [126] | Any conversation in the world in my opinion is a good thing. It keeps me coming back knowing that the regulars are around throughout the day. Sometimes there is a gem, sometimes off topic chat. But I know someone is here. If I have a question, I know people will see it if placed in the proper group. |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [127] | a static world is death .. like an unchanging website |
Brock 26-Feb-2005 [128x2] | For instance, two questions today for Ammon re: his drop-down.r - both answered within minutes. Other Rebol related questions go no longer than a day if it is general enough. That is VALUE. |
Exactly/ | |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [130] | and the cost is .. some noise |
Brock 26-Feb-2005 [131x2] | x-internet noise ;) |
(very low bandwidth) | |
Graham 26-Feb-2005 [133] | I've never heard Carl ask us to keep to rebol topics .. so if we stick to the topic no one should really have much to complain about |
Brock 26-Feb-2005 [134] | All RT related topics for user help etc are already in REBOL group. The others are obviously not specific to Rebol. |
Terry 26-Feb-2005 [135] | I thought the ML was the technical / support forum? |
Brock 26-Feb-2005 [136] | It likely is from the RT perspective - but I know where I am going to go to get my questions answered if I need a timely response. |
Tomc 27-Feb-2005 [137] | I belive RT thinks that email is dead, but since not everyone understands it they still have to support it. |
Graham 27-Feb-2005 [138] | Brian '== is exactly equals, but equal? and = are equivalent except the latter is faster |
BrianW 27-Feb-2005 [139x2] | ohh, thanks Graham |
Graham: Is '== the operator for 'strict-equal? then? | |
Graham 27-Feb-2005 [141] | yes .. http://www.rebol.com/docs/words/weqeq.html |
BrianW 27-Feb-2005 [142] | Thanks. That reminds me, I meant to mention 'help in this chapter. Maybe I should work back it into the first chapter. |
shadwolf 27-Feb-2005 [143x3] | Ashley: your wellcome for your consern but in fact integrating your new engine from MDViewer only takes my 2-3 hours ( in fact i spent more time like 10 hours to try to mixe both method has it wasn't has performant has your rendering full engine I cleared the mixed one and retake as it MD-Viewer engine then I adpat it to MDP standars ) Now MDP-GUI has a super fast rendering engine like MDViewer (Ineed to enhance the speed of the toc window rendering that the only slowing remaining step). Another time what a work you made as I trully knows it intimely (because of the work needed to integrate it to MDP-GUI) I can say that in front the previous rendering method you made really a ART WORK it's clear it's tiny it's easy to understand :) |
andit's trully performant ;) | |
one of the diffrence with "normal" MDP doc is that the toc is shown into a sépareted window. By click on entries into this window you scroll the preview panel content to the related section | |
Gregg 27-Feb-2005 [146] | Oh boy. First, I *have* been contacted to ask if I could take certain actions, but not by RT. RT made me a world master here, which *I* consider to be form of moderator (with the main task being to assign and maintain accounts), though there is not a definite job description sitting on my desk. Now, I am also a regular user in this world, and there are definitely conflicts for me WRT those positions. As I've said before, I enjoy a good chat as much as anyone, and I *don't* want to censor people here, but that may be necessary at some point, wouldn't you agree? If someone were quite obviously, in the opinion of 99.9% of the people here, abusive, rude, offensive, etc. should they be allowed to run rampant and ruin this world for everyone else? I don't think so; maybe you do. When I joined the REBOL community, one of the main attractions was the high level of mutual respect, the generosity towards newcomers, and the complete *lack* of the venom you sometimes see unleashed in other language communities. *That* is what kept *me* coming back. The more argumentative discussions and personal jibes people see, the less likely they are to post, IME, because they don't want to be attacked themselves and if that's the tone they often see, it's what they will expect. When it comes to content, as a world master and a user *I* think that *most* channels here *should* be REBOL related. The world is called "REBOL", and I think RT created and sponsors it for the REBOL community. That's my view; that's how I view the ML as well. There are probably at least 20-25 non-REBOL, non-Technical groups here now; that's quite a lot IMO. There are times that I would really like to clean this world up a bit, and as a user I could, but as a world master I don't feel that I can because someone will complain that I'm trying to censor or control things here (so if I ever do that, get mad at me as a user, not as a world master :-). Petr, I'm sorry you feel that I'm trying to limit free speech here, or to control anyone's behavior; I made some *suggestions* I thought were appropriate. I spent a *lot* of time writing and editing my posts in the hope that they weren't too strong, but still got my view across. If you think that you should be able to use this world for anything you want, personally, I disagree; it's RTs world and we are guests in their house. If there is something specific in my posts that offended you, please let me know what it was. As a user, I haven't been around much lately. Mostly my schedule is the cause, but maybe it's also because the technical value of the world has been diluted (IMO) by noise, so I'm just not as "driven" to come here and make time to participate. I'm normally on dial-up, so that affects download time, yes. Right now, I'm on a fast connection but the noise is still a problem because I have to visit all the groups that come up red to see what's new, and if I only have a small amount of time to spend, it may all get eaten up just skimming what others posted. Also, the more noise there is, and the more we get in the habit of talking about non-technical stuff here (again, this is all *my* opinion), the more chance there is for it to leak out into other groups, and it does. The camaraderie comes from the people; the technical value comes from the experts who often focus on that aspect and may stop coming if there's too much noise here. When that happens, the value of the world is diminished. Well, my time is long gone for writing here, but I hope that helps clarify my position. |
shadwolf 27-Feb-2005 [147x2] | AShley there is a problem rendering this in MDViewer <c red>t</c><c orange>e</c><c orange>s</c><c yellow>t</c> |
But with the same engine that works perfectly in MDP-GUI (with a little bad redering on the s caracter I don't know why..) | |
older newer | first last |