World: r3wp

but for altme to become really more adopted, world look-up port should 
be removed, as I can see it as unnecessary obstacle ...

couldn't it be done via default 80 port plus cgi?

world lookup is so that they can control the licensing.

yes, but why does have to run it via special port?

Grham ..Is it a coinsidence that I like FileSharing very much in 
your Chat Applet and its now inside Altme ? ;-)

AltMe files application is not available on this world...

Can smoeone send me the last 10 lines frmo this Group? It seemed 
to be lost while I was running the old Altme and the new at the same 
time..

untill Carls notification

Well almost complete this filesharing... If there would be a nice 
Password protection possible on shared files (Like the SHA exmaple 
from Carls Cookbook) the filesharing would be complete upto the level 
of privicy ...

...Shared files and stored with encoding... So let the newsgroups 
now misuse ALTME for anything ;-) Good for business though...

Rebolinth, I guess it's the situation of simultaneous separate development 
:)

installed on top of the old with no problems

hundreds of mouse clicks later .. I've cleared all the reds :(

yeah, any news on how close this beta is to final?

You'd think there would be a "clear-all" button.

I must request a feature to create source files directly within the 
filesharing area. if it works how I think it works, this could be 
used for a form of collaborative editing

Yes That was a feature request frmo 2 years ago from me too, Clear 
all unread messages with 1 click..

I like the edit/publish methodology inside the filesharing area

I Wish I wendy I wanda.. there was a linux beta ;-)

Q: Where should the clear-all button go?

Q: Does the current REBOL/View 1.3.2 work ok on your Linux box?

at the bottom possibly? how about making room for a button panel 
just below the list of groups. I think some of the options related 
to editing that list are a little too hidden

Yes here no real problems with the last rebview from sdk 262..

Yes 1.3.2 works on linux

exept for the Fonts in draw ofcourse

no problems with 1.3.2 under ubuntu linux here (not even the ubuntu 
version)

So, are you using the Ubuntu version or the older lib version?

Im using "slackware 10.2" with  libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3

just the older lib version, I haven't downloaded the ubuntu version 
at all... did you make the ubuntu version because of Hoary's lib 
problems?

Actually, the older one no longer ran on half the Linux boxes here.

So, question is, which one to pick for AltME build?

...Silence...tells more then words.... (well i could say take the 
latest 1.3.2 lib..) not easy for an outsider to descide ;-)

Carl,  the Clear-All button could go in the "list options" though 
that's a bit hidden.

libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is thought default in the kernels 2.4.26 
and up i guess but not sure.. is hard to find that Lib as standalown 
..(if you need it)

There are a few other gotcha libs in the mix like. 
libXaw7.so.7

You could also have a clear + date (up to ) feature.

I've got a new debian distro that came in yesterday... let me see 
what it's got going. Back later with info.

debian and slackware are the two that dont mess with the original 
distribution when it comes to library's.. I guess it'll work..

a very nice example when programming on different linux distributions 
is to keep an Eye dies days on the "MALLOC_CHECK" environment setting 
or auto_make/config prebuild releases, this can cause lots of debugging 
pain because its able by default to supress core dump while it should 
not, and thats not always mentioned in the distributions your working 
on. ..any.. offtopic..

seems you can't just build one linux version and claim liniux as 
a supported platform

I would say at leasr tww maune three versions with different libraries

...redhat started it all...or was it YggDrasil ? ;-)

or we could compile our own

Moving to linux group.

Hmm.  I quit normally, but when I logged on just now a whole bunch 
of groups came up red.  Each of these groups, the messages are yellowed 
indicating that theyre old ie. no new messages.

Ahh... okay, I opened up with the old Altme.

I guess I now have two installations :(

Yes, what is the advice on that ? The beta download page:
http://www.altme.com/beta.html
advises:

# Both your AltME world server and clients need to be updated.
They 
both must be running the newer code. If you only use the newer client, 
but not a newer world server, you will see very few changes.

So is safeworlds running a new beta server for the beta clients to 
test with ?

Is there a list of changes coming up?