r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!AltME] Discussion about AltME

Brock
7-Apr-2009
[3304x2]
Here's another wish list item.   I am had a family only list going. 
 People would forget to login and check what was updated on occassion, 
and during slow periods with little entry, would miss that one or 
two days where something was added.  So, a nag feature that can be 
turned on and off by both the user and administrator.  It would send 
an email from the World server telling the person updates were posted 
to the World.
Is the code available to make AltME topics available on the web? 
 I'm starting a world with a sports team and want a Blackberry user 
to be able to check-in if updates have been made.
Graham
7-Apr-2009
[3306x2]
Didier published some once ... and I presume that the library has 
some code of their own.
But presumably you could just look at the dates on the file sets 
and publish just those.
Brock
7-Apr-2009
[3308]
thanks for the suggestion Graham.
Sunanda
8-Apr-2009
[3309]
The code you need is very simple.... As Graham suggests, just check 
the timestamp on the nnn.set files.


If you want to tell your rellies how many messages are outstanding, 
check the timestamp on the entries in each .set file [teh file itself 
is a REBOL block, so very easy to load).


Just one possible gotcha -- you may not want to be disclosing details 
of your personal messages (eg don't tell your mom whenever you have 
had a private chat with your dad), nor of private groups (Gran should 
not even know about the private group arranging her 90th birthday 
party).
Brock
8-Apr-2009
[3310]
Okay, thanks for your help Sunanda.
amacleod
11-Apr-2009
[3311x3]
Is there a way to change a folder name in files?
and have in syncronized with other users
in > it
Sunanda
15-Apr-2009
[3314]
Anyone else see around a 30 minute outage of this world, just now?
sqlab
15-Apr-2009
[3315]
I saw it
Geomol
15-Apr-2009
[3316]
yes
Sunanda
15-Apr-2009
[3317]
Thanks.

REBOL.net was inaccessible too....Maybe a short server break [this 
world and REBOL.net share an IP address]
Henrik
15-Apr-2009
[3318x2]
yes
Interesting. I could access and post to Rebdev Chat.
Graham
15-Apr-2009
[3320]
rebdev chat is on a different server
eFishAnt
16-Apr-2009
[3321x3]
question, does AltME serving on 'nix require some level of graphica 
user interface running?  If so, what?
Interesting thing about FaceBook.  I know someone (name private to 
keep the innocent from Big Brothers) who uses FaceBook and was forced 
by the policy of their employer to not let a friend join (who was 
fired) their facebook because the employer could peruse the person's 
facebook, and is doing so, and it is part of that employer's employee 
handbook.


That is scary.  It validates the IOS/AltME way of better privacy, 
in my mind.
I would think this will kill facebook.
Henrik
16-Apr-2009
[3324]
only if people cares about it. the popularity of facebook here is... 
absurd.
Geomol
16-Apr-2009
[3325]
How long will Facebook last? What will replace it?
eFishAnt
16-Apr-2009
[3326x3]
I think like Carl's essay on the trouble with email, AltME could 
do a more strategic but pointed talk about Safeworlds fixes the problem 
with Facebook.
(of course people still use email, but email is quite different from 
the spillage of info from facebook.  email is more private than facebook
I just wanted to express this Ahha moment I had today, from a discussio 
with this person.
Oldes
16-Apr-2009
[3329]
Who is responsible for the Altme? I want sources so I can fix the 
really stupid link bug!
Geomol
16-Apr-2009
[3330]
I would guess Carl programmed it.
Graham
16-Apr-2009
[3331]
I think Carl has taken it over but didn't do it originally.
Sunanda
17-Apr-2009
[3332]
Based on this post, it may still be Reichart:

  http://www.rebol.org/aga-display-posts.r?offset=-1&post=r3wp151x458
Graham
17-Apr-2009
[3333]
Carl was doing the lastest builds.
Pekr
17-Apr-2009
[3334]
I have heard AltME is now RT's responsibility ...
Reichart
17-Apr-2009
[3335]
Correct, Carl is your man.
Graham
17-Apr-2009
[3336]
which means fixes won't be a priority
Reichart
17-Apr-2009
[3337]
This is why I keep asking you guys to post in Feedback, because that 
is automated, ensures everything is captured, and although updates 
comes slowly, he does do them in the order there.
Graham
17-Apr-2009
[3338x2]
that url bug has been there since inception
Oldes, you can't have the sources!!!
Pekr
17-Apr-2009
[3340x3]
Report for those that are trying to run more than 2 world servers 
on one machine - we were unable to register second world, even if 
the first one was running, and hence TCP port 5400 was occupied. 
Last weekend I did some experiments, and my conclusion is that if 
you need to start secondary world


1) make sure that your primary world is running - this will prevent 
registration process to use first (or simply lower TCP port). AltME 
starts with using ports 5400 and higher ..


2) block your ports (NAT) on your firewall. Simply put, there has 
to be some bug. Even if my primary world server was running = port 
5400 was occupied, my new world was assigned port 5400 too. Simply 
put - it has to be AltME server at SafeWorlds, which connects back 
to your site, and mistakenly uses 5400 to check. Then it registers 
5400 for your new world. This is my speculation. But the solution 
really is to block your prior (already being used) AltME ports on 
your firewall (NAT)
So - I am now running multiple worlds on a single machine succesfully 
....
To help read URL bugged posts I switch letter size to small, and 
most of the time I am able to correctly read the message :-)
Reichart
17-Apr-2009
[3343x2]
I am a HUGE fan of handing over the source!  You will need to bring 
that up with Carl at this point.
This is no longer my call.
Pekr
17-Apr-2009
[3345]
OK, I will bring it to Carl :-)
Reichart
17-Apr-2009
[3346]
Yes...may I suggest a ralley of the troops : )
Pekr
17-Apr-2009
[3347]
posted to Carl ... we will see what he thinks ....
Graham
17-Apr-2009
[3348x2]
Huh?  RT now owns the product?
I presumed that they were being contracted to support it ...
Reichart
17-Apr-2009
[3350]
presumption is an odd form of science : )
Graham
17-Apr-2009
[3351x2]
logical deduction.
not necesarily correct, but logical.
eFishAnt
17-Apr-2009
[3353]
:)