World: r3wp
[!AltME] Discussion about AltME
older newer | first last |
Graham 26-May-2009 [3627x2] | lol |
anyway, someone should do some testing to see what the limits are for concurrent viable connections for a rebol based chat server | |
Maxim 26-May-2009 [3629] | hum... wouldn't you, like, be the best person to do those tests ;-) |
Graham 26-May-2009 [3630x3] | Lots of people could do it. |
Max ... you got disco'd !!! | |
we found the limit. | |
Maxim 26-May-2009 [3633x2] | hahahaha |
I actually pressed the close button by accident ;-) | |
Graham 26-May-2009 [3635] | awwww.... |
Maxim 26-May-2009 [3636] | but don't you actually have a chat server software against which you can implement a client-side test connection loop? ;-D |
Graham 26-May-2009 [3637x2] | Yes. |
but it uses BEER so it might reach a BEER limitation | |
Maxim 26-May-2009 [3639] | well if we can reach 100 connections to beer.. we definitely will have a party (or a brawl) ;-) |
Graham 26-May-2009 [3640] | well, the source is there .. just modify it to login automatically and start sending serial numbers to see if they are returned. |
sqlab 26-May-2009 [3641] | If I remember right, once I had around 250 or 127 connections at the same time. Don't remember the right number, just that I thought, that's the limit to one port number. |
amacleod 26-May-2009 [3642] | What happens if the limit is exceeded? Does the whole thing fail or does it just refuse the connection to the those beyond limit? |
Maxim 26-May-2009 [3643] | it melts your computer and spams alll the people in your contact list ;-) |
ddharing 26-May-2009 [3644x2] | Some have asked questions in the past about the file size limit in AltMe. It appears to be 6 megs. |
It's disappointingly small. I wonder if there is a technical reason. | |
Brock 26-May-2009 [3646] | I think it was more a practical reason so users of dial-up or slower connections weren't forced to sit through extremely long downloads. I thought this limit was adjustable per AltME server, but I haven't been able to find a setting, so maybe I was wrong. |
ddharing 26-May-2009 [3647x2] | If that is the case then I wonder if there is also a limit to the number of files per world; otherwise, it was not a well thought out limitation because 100, 6-megs files is still a lot of waiting on slow connections. |
A setting would have been nice -- like you said. | |
Brock 26-May-2009 [3649x2] | The nice thing is AltME asks you if you want to download large files or leave on the server, and highlights these icons with different coloured backgrounds. so they are accessible and ready when you want them to be downloaded. |
I've always thought a nice feature would be to set the 'start-date' from where you wanted to receive data from, so you could ease into retrieving either the entire world's contents, or simply start fresh with only the recent submissions. However, your search capability would be limited as the search is performed locally on the data you have available. Maybe the next AltME will have more features like this. | |
ddharing 26-May-2009 [3651x3] | That's a similar feature as the newsgroup readers. Along those same lines, AltMe could just download the file list with comments instead of the files themselves. |
It looks like the next Altme is tied to R3. I don't have a full view of Altme's roadmap which seems more like a poorly marked trail. I've tried to follow it somewhat using sources like this group, Carl's blog and most recently his slides from DevCon 2007. However, I'm not involved in R3, so I suspect I've missed some important sources. | |
The grand plan of R3 seems years away, though. Since Carl now controls the AltMe source code, I wish he would pick a trusted person from the community to keep the R2 AltMe moving forward. I will probably have to drop AltMe as a customer service tool because of issues like this 6 meg limit that shouldn't even be an issue. | |
Henrik 26-May-2009 [3654] | It's definitely a technical limitation. There was a limited release of a version with a much bigger file size limit, but AFAIR, it was unstable and quickly retracted. |
Graham 26-May-2009 [3655] | Probably just unable to accept the new connection. |
Reichart 26-May-2009 [3656] | Yup... |
ddharing 26-May-2009 [3657] | OK. Thanks for the update. |
amacleod 27-May-2009 [3658] | I'm a little worried about granting everyone group rights in the world I'm creating. It will be mostly NYC firefighters, many of which have little computer/internet/web experience and might delete groups accidently or maliciously as the are a group that is not always as well behaved as most reboler's. But at the same time I want them to be able to create private groups. If a group is deleted how difficult is it to restore it...if possible...with previous messages. |
Brock 27-May-2009 [3659] | I wouldn't grant this then. Have a group for "new discussion topics", and your trusted admins can create them when available. |
amacleod 27-May-2009 [3660] | That's kind of what I thought I would do but the attraction of the ability to form private groups is too great not to take the initial risk. I can form new policies later if problems occur. I just want to be able to restore a group or groups in the event of... |
amacleod 29-May-2009 [3661] | Is there anyway to read the server files data outside of altme to monitor users that are active (online) in a world? |
Geomol 29-May-2009 [3662x2] | Look in the file "users.set". Last date field seems to be, when people was active. |
Or maybe that's just last login or logout!? | |
amacleod 29-May-2009 [3664] | I looked throught hte files but I could not see an indication of active users. Perhaps that is held in memory... |
Sunanda 29-May-2009 [3665] | As far as i can tell, the files stored under the world name show only when a user joined and when they last posted. Clearly, AltME is sending connection information -- we can all see that if we sort the Users list by Status. But is there an API to access that? There may be an answer available here :-) http://www.altme.com/feedback.html |
BrianH 29-May-2009 [3666] | Lots of dropouts the last couple days... |
Maxim 29-May-2009 [3667] | <sigh> got one while trying to post a message about drop outs... irony if there is any in altme. |
Graham 29-May-2009 [3668x2] | kee dropping out today ... and lost my 3rd message. |
even lost the "p" in the above message | |
Maxim 29-May-2009 [3670] | seems better than 2 hours ago... it was dropping about every minute. |
Graham 29-May-2009 [3671] | So, is this a network issue to rebol.net? |
Maxim 29-May-2009 [3672x2] | I am pretty sure it is. |
we've all been feeling it the last few days. | |
Reichart 29-May-2009 [3674] | I notice FaceBook is really bad too, but not other sites................hmmmm... |
Maxim 29-May-2009 [3675x2] | one of BCE's MAIN DNS went down today for almost 30 minutes... |
actually all ip stuff went down. :-( | |
older newer | first last |