World: r3wp
[!AltME] Discussion about AltME
older newer | first last |
Oldes 30-May-2009 [3685] | I wonder if AltME is able to detect some brute force actions. |
mhinson 30-May-2009 [3686x2] | I have been looking at my WireShark output during one of the recent AltME problems. What seems to happen is that the server stops responding to the client keep alive requests (sent evey 5 seconds normaly), but the IP address keeps responding to my pings with almost no dropped packets or increase in latency. |
After a while the client stops sending keep alives & the view changes away from the "chat" view. Changing back to the chat view causes the client to create a new TCP connection (local port number changes) & exchange some ?authentication? data & some larger blocks of data too. After that the server stops responding to the keep alives again & the process repeats. | |
Pekr 30-May-2009 [3688] | Oldes - btw - I got some reply from Carl. He said that it is not problem to post related sources to the area of interest we want to fix. It might mean he is not willing to release all altme source code. But I think it might be a good start. So if we e.g. want to fix the URL parse bug, I think we can manage it? |
Sunanda 30-May-2009 [3689] | Good result, Petr. Can we manage it? Well, partially, it'll depend on how well written the code is:-) If we can manage it, we may get a shot at some other fixes too. So let's at least try |
Maxim 30-May-2009 [3690] | the post dropping is the # 1 bug in Atlme. lets just prevent it from flushing the text area before it receives the post, and at least we won't be frustrated. the clearing of the view when a connection is dropped is also EXTREMELY annoying... you have to click back on the group, and it clears te "unread" bg color and resets the scrollbar. these can be changed without any real coding change required... its just preventing a few things in the gui/network event handling. maybe we could just the bg of the Network status to RED, that accomplishes the same goal, but doesn't turn us into enraged altme users. |
mhinson 30-May-2009 [3691] | If the code is being kept mostly private perhaps at some stage it will be developed further as a comercial product, in which case it would seem usefull if we as test users record a list of bugs & useability suggestions in a structured way perhaps? |
Sunanda 30-May-2009 [3692x2] | [fourth time of trying to post this]: thanks for the analysis of the connection problems, Mike. |
[third repost]: There's a good list of bugs and suggestions starting here: http://www.rebol.org/aga-display-posts.r?post=r3wp151x457 | |
Graham 30-May-2009 [3694x4] | hehe .. this was my suggestion in 2005 "security - stop unauthorised users from removing/renaming groups" |
But I think the most important bug to be fixed is to stop losing messages. Eg. create a buffer to store the outgoing message. | |
As a test I have both the r3-alpha world, the r2-beta world and this one open. I got dropped multiple times from this one but the other worlds were fine during this. | |
So, it looks to be world specific ... | |
mhinson 30-May-2009 [3698] | Sunanda, thanks for the link. I had a good read of that and was surprised to not find any requests for keyboard shortcuts, paticularly the use of the arrow keys to scroll lists & text.. That would be my top request I think. |
Steeve 30-May-2009 [3699x2] | I wonder if the problem comes from people with a bad connection (like me). Strangly, each time my connection to internet makes a fuss, i can see complaints on Altme. o_o' |
And i'm only connected to that world | |
Reichart 30-May-2009 [3701x2] | The web is a flutter with how slow FaceBook is too... |
And for the exact time frame we have seen it heere too....hmmmm... | |
Graham 30-May-2009 [3703] | maybe this server needs to be reset or something. |
Chris 30-May-2009 [3704] | Perhaps the whole Internet really was busy? AltME's been telling it like it is... |
Maxim 31-May-2009 [3705] | messenger hasn't been giving me a hard time at all. neither has google chat. |
Graham 31-May-2009 [3706] | Just Cheyenne |
Anton 31-May-2009 [3707] | I've had a couple of dropped posts too, the past few days. |
Janko 31-May-2009 [3708] | Just to report that I also have problems with altme in last days "internet busy.." |
Oldes 31-May-2009 [3709] | Maybe it's the Google's Wave which makes Internet busy.. updating conversations of all the planet in real time.) |
Henrik 31-May-2009 [3710] | is it possible to check if the server is overloaded? are there problems with other worlds? |
Oldes 31-May-2009 [3711] | I just checked.. r3-alpha world is affected as well. (probably same machine) |
Pekr 31-May-2009 [3712] | It already happened in the past and IIRC someone called Carl and he restarted servers. I contacted him privately yesterday in R3 Chat. No reply so far, maybe RT is on vacation :-) |
Maxim 31-May-2009 [3713x2] | graham: LOL its behaving now. |
wasn't there an FTP group here before? | |
Graham 31-May-2009 [3715x2] | you're thinking of previous worlds |
I think there was once, and also a FTPgadget channel | |
Maxim 31-May-2009 [3717x4] | some code supplied from anton that I was about to use.... has disapeared... I'm pretty sure in was in a group called ftp |
I did a full search in altme and didn't find it. | |
nope ... discussions I had with anton this spring. | |
btw, IMHO, the current altme droppings aren't due to networking speed/internet woes ... right now, when I post I get a turnaround well below half a second. It almost feels instantaneous. still I must relog every so often, If I want to be syncing again. the server just stops responding after a few minutes. :-( | |
Graham 31-May-2009 [3721x4] | I think it's the server playing up ... not network issues per se |
still playing up today ... | |
17,000 posts in this world so far already this year, and only 18,000 for the whole of last year. | |
Must be the effect of R3 | |
Maxim 31-May-2009 [3725] | NB: with regards to Prefixing group names... just today... had the groups been prefixed, I would have found a post I have been looking for the better part of an hour... just cause I'd have noticed the group name next to network related groups... I actually looked at the name and never *clicked* it was a network group... ' : - / |
Graham 31-May-2009 [3726] | Use the search tool ... it's your friend |
Maxim 31-May-2009 [3727x2] | I did... 3 different searches... but didn't get to any thing that pointed to that post... |
just fell in between the cracks. | |
Graham 31-May-2009 [3729] | I searched for all posts by Anton with the word "progress" since the beginning of this year |
Maxim 1-Jun-2009 [3730x2] | as always... Carl passes by like a breeze hehehe |
wow.. that didn't drop! ;-) | |
Sunanda 1-Jun-2009 [3732] | Graham: <17,000 posts in this world so far already this year> That's [web-public] posts. Actual world size is around twice that (*), though I don't have a count of posts-by -year. (*) No one of us can know the precise world size --- we do not all see the private groups; nor do we all see the PMs between everyone. |
Gregg 2-Jun-2009 [3733x2] | I also have CDR for change-dir+to-rebol-file. |
Dang, wrong group. :-\ | |
older newer | first last |