World: r3wp
[!AltME] Discussion about AltME
older newer | first last |
Graham 23-Jul-2010 [4647] | 1.2.24 ... |
Henrik 23-Jul-2010 [4648] | I have 1.2.25 here. |
Sunanda 23-Jul-2010 [4649] | I had the same thing Graham.....But when I restarted AltME, it was 1.2.25. |
Graham 23-Jul-2010 [4650] | it was in an upgrade loop .. kept asking me to upgrade to .25 after I upped |
Anton 25-Jul-2010 [4651] | Search and extract AltME messages: http://anton.wildit.net.au/rebol/util/AltME/AltME-helper-funcs.r |
Carl 27-Jul-2010 [4652] | For anyone using Vista or Sys7, there is a new AltME to test that installs better: www.altme.com/download/altme26c.exe We want to release it in about 12 hours, so if you have any problems, please let me know. |
Sunanda 27-Jul-2010 [4653] | Just tried it on Vista: -- needed Admin level to install in current folder installation folder -- PCTool's Threatfire reported it as "high risk" -- because it was copying files to multiple locations -- did a resync, downloaded a lot of older messages, and turned many groups red....Not in itself a bad thing as that could properly sync some groups with missing messages; but a little surprising as most of the red groups had no new messages. |
BrianH 27-Jul-2010 [4654] | What was the current folder you were trying to install to? |
Sunanda 27-Jul-2010 [4655] | The current folder it is installed in: program files/altme |
BrianH 27-Jul-2010 [4656x3] | And did it pop up a UAC prompt? It it was installing to any of the program files directories, it should have asked for admin by a UAC prompt. |
And if it did, it should have put its data files somewhere under the user data directories, not in program files. | |
I'm not saying that is what it did for me, I'm saying that is what an app should do, especially on Vista/7/2008. | |
Sunanda 27-Jul-2010 [4659] | No, it popped up an AktME box saying iy could not install for one of two reasons: -- altme already running (it was not) -- needs admin-level permission I restarted it with admin-level permission It looks like the data files have been installed in a different location to where they were before. This may be a good thing in the longer-term. But a little confusing just now. Sorry -- got to go now.....Back in 12 hours. |
BrianH 27-Jul-2010 [4660x3] | AltME is a tiny program that doesn't handle any file extensions. It should be installing under C:\Users\Brian\AppData\Local (for the Brian user, i.e.). You can get that value from the "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Shell Folders" key, in the "Local AppData" value. |
That will work on any version of Windows starting with 2000, and possibly earlier. | |
Personally, I run AltME as a portable app, but if I ran it as a local app that is where I would put it. Chrome installs in the same location too. | |
Carl 27-Jul-2010 [4663x3] | To clarify: AltME attempts to install in %appdata% (which is the path indicated above by BrianH.) It then uses "local" not "roaming". |
However, for a "reinstall" vs a "fresh install" it will try to use your older installed location. That's why the above happened. | |
I suppose that this feature should be "removed" -- what do you think? | |
Maxim 27-Jul-2010 [4666] | what feature? the reinstall? |
Carl 27-Jul-2010 [4667] | Reinstall using the prior location rather than the appdata location. |
Maxim 27-Jul-2010 [4668] | you could copy the files to the new installation path. on people with slow or buggy connections, this will make a huge impact. |
Carl 27-Jul-2010 [4669] | Yes... I was thinking of doing that. |
Maxim 27-Jul-2010 [4670] | that would be the best solution. it makes Altme windows compliant, from that point on. |
Carl 27-Jul-2010 [4671x2] | I wonder if Vista/Sys7 will complain if we copy files (read access) out of that dir? |
(I don't use Vista or Sys7, and plan never to do so.) | |
Maxim 27-Jul-2010 [4673] | It shoudn't complain, AFAIK. |
Carl 27-Jul-2010 [4674x2] | Strange. The "reinstall" method is commented out. It would only use PF dir if appdata var has no value. Sunanda, what OS are you running? |
Whoops, sorry, no. Wrong version. Ignore last msg. | |
Sunanda 27-Jul-2010 [4676] | If you are fixing the Windows Virtual Store problem (which is a Windows problem that AltME is a victim of) then a little bit of inconvenience to fix it is acceptable -- at least to me. Interestingly, it looks to me like this world got resynced, but the other worlds I look at regularly (eg REBOL-gate) did not....So perhaps the resync was an artefact of the upgrade; and it did not affect worlds opened after the upgrade was complete. |
Carl 27-Jul-2010 [4677] | Yes, it needs to be fixed. Too many users having problems. Odd problem... that resync for this world. |
BrianH 27-Jul-2010 [4678] | Carl, you should also try running AltME in XP or 2000 as a regular user (not "Power User" or admin), without making any changes to the permissions of the AltME directory. Oh, and your %appdata% to local trick won't work on XP or 2000 because the naming convention for the directories is different. The registry method works for all Windows 2000+ though. |
Carl 27-Jul-2010 [4679x2] | We normally test with regular user (Cindy's task.) %appdata% works on XP. Perhaps added to an SP? This release should do the right thing. Even if you installed earlier in PF, it will try to move it, unless you opt not to. www.altme.com/download/altme26e.exe |
You will need to reinstall with it, or run with +i on command line to force reinstall. | |
Carl 28-Jul-2010 [4681] | Checking in. I guess it works ok? |
Sunanda 28-Jul-2010 [4682] | Other than the install issue, it's working well for me. |
Sunanda 29-Jul-2010 [4683] | Another oddity.....I just entered this world after rekeying my username and password (rather than taking the usual on-screen saved values). That seems to have triggered a resync of the checklists. No idea if it updated any, just that it checked them all for updates. |
Andreas 10-Aug-2010 [4684x2] | Total message count over all groups of this world (or at least those I have %.set files for), per year: 51628 2005 46135 2006 44907 2007 34882 2008 61481 2009 39180 2010 |
Script used: $ rebol -qs --do 'foreach f remove-each f read d: %worlds/rebol3/chat/ [not %.set = suffix? f] [foreach r next load/all join d f [print r/2/year]] q' | sort | uniq -c | |
AdrianS 17-Aug-2010 [4686] | Is there a way to be notified of a private chat message on AltME in a more intrusive way than just turning the user name red? I usually have the All Users section collapsed because I want the groups to be front and foremost so I don't notice new private messages unless I expand the users section. I just noticed now that I had some messages from Graham and Ladislav from July. Sorry guys, didn't mean to ignore you - just didn't notice. |
Henrik 17-Aug-2010 [4687] | For me, the All Users title bar turns red and I have it at the top, so that's how I notice when I have private messages, even if the list is collapsed. |
Pekr 17-Aug-2010 [4688] | well, it is sufficient for me the way you described it. When I sync, when I see "All users" in red, I go there first, to see private messages ... hmm, maybe I am still waiting, when one day, I will see the private message from Carl, informing me, that Google, Microsoft, IBM just agreed to use REBOL as their primary dev. tool, and that Google bought Amiga for him, and that new Amiga is about to be launched, with REBOL based OS :-D |
Henrik 17-Aug-2010 [4689] | For me a more realistic expectation is to have right-click-to-copy-text working more than once. |
AdrianS 17-Aug-2010 [4690] | can one of you send me a test ping? - maybe I'm just blind and didn't notice the header turning red |
Henrik 17-Aug-2010 [4691] | also I sort by activity rather than users. that helps too. |
AdrianS 17-Aug-2010 [4692] | thanks - I'm blind - I'll have to be more observant |
Reichart 17-Aug-2010 [4693] | You could, technically, write a few lines of REBOL that looks for changes in the Chat files (there is one for each group), and pop up a requester on your screen. |
Henrik 17-Aug-2010 [4694x2] | Perhaps it would be interesting if AltME could run a script on every new message. |
The input would be user, timestamp and message. Then you can do what you want with that information. | |
Robert 17-Aug-2010 [4696] | AltMe is missing a read-only role for some groups. This would make it possible to make "private" groups and let others monitor it. |
older newer | first last |