World: r3wp
[RAMBO] The REBOL bug and enhancement database
older newer | first last |
Maxim 8-Feb-2007 [2665] | this sort of brings back the "nice toy" effect of REBOL within the plugin. :-( |
BrianH 8-Feb-2007 [2666] | Are these events handled by other plugins, like Flash and Java applets? |
Maxim 8-Feb-2007 [2667x2] | ah... "enter" key... yes for sure. |
I can't be sure... as I'm no flash expert, but my gut feeling is that since actual controls do receive the events... object controls should also be able to receive them ... I posted the bug mainly to make sure the enter key isn't forgotten... cause that is quite weird. | |
Graham 8-Feb-2007 [2669x4] | There's a small but significant "bug" in prot-esmtp.r that for most users doesn't matter. |
the protocol sends a terminating "." to signify the end of an email. But this is not correct. The RFC specifies that you should send crlf "." crlf | |
and what is actually being sent is .. lf "." lf | |
gmail just hangs on this because it is expecting to see crlf "." crlf | |
BrianH 8-Feb-2007 [2673] | Is it sending lf or is it sending the platform-specific line ending? |
Graham 8-Feb-2007 [2674x4] | Now if you send crlf "." crlf to smtp.gmail.com, gmail just then drops the line on you. |
because the port is opened with /lines, it is actually sending crlf "." crlf lf | |
which gmail does not like at all. | |
so, you have to send crlf ".^M" instead ! | |
BrianH 8-Feb-2007 [2678] | I think you can open a port with /lines in a way that specifies the line ending string. |
Graham 8-Feb-2007 [2679x2] | I've only tested this on windows .. will have to see what core does on linux |
but all the internet protocols use crlf and not lf | |
BrianH 8-Feb-2007 [2681] | It seems to me that crlf should be specified as the line ending for most internet protocols. |
Graham 8-Feb-2007 [2682] | yes |
BrianH 8-Feb-2007 [2683] | Sorry, you just said that. |
Graham 8-Feb-2007 [2684x2] | took me a few days of puzzling what was going on. |
of course ethereal turned out to be no help because I was tracing ssl. | |
BrianH 8-Feb-2007 [2686] | This seems like an easy fix to someone who has the time, the SDK source and the inclination. |
Graham 8-Feb-2007 [2687x2] | Yep |
most of us are missing all three | |
BrianH 8-Feb-2007 [2689] | I'm just missing the time (and the need). |
Gabriele 8-Feb-2007 [2690x5] | wait! i know why that is happening. |
the default for tcp:// is CRLF | |
BUT the default for ssl:// is LF! that is a bug i reported some time ago. (it created problems for https:// too) | |
you can workaround it by adding a /with refinement to the open (it will not hurt tcp either) | |
http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?id=3532& | |
BrianH 8-Feb-2007 [2695] | Can such /with refinements be added to the default protocols built on SSL? It shouldn't hurt when the ssl:// default is eventually fixed. |
Gabriele 8-Feb-2007 [2696x2] | it was added to http, it should to any other protocol that uses ssl. |
but the bug should really be fixed! i have reported it in 2004 ;) | |
Graham 8-Feb-2007 [2698x2] | Good to know! |
that history is repeating itself :( | |
BrianH 8-Feb-2007 [2700] | Perhaps you can use the /with refinement in your esmtps protocol, Graham. |
Graham 8-Feb-2007 [2701] | Yeah .. |
Gabriele 8-Feb-2007 [2702] | yes, i think it will work fine if you just open/with |
Graham 8-Feb-2007 [2703] | Someone at RT should really go thru the old bugs and make sure that they are all fixed |
Gabriele 8-Feb-2007 [2704x2] | that will eventually happen. |
that's why they are in rambo - they won't be forgotten. | |
Maxim 8-Feb-2007 [2706] | is forgetting them better than not fixing them? I wonder ;-) |
BrianH 8-Feb-2007 [2707] | I'm looking at the http protocol source, and I find no indication of any fix to the default line ending of ssl:// - do I have the right source? It is dated 5-Dec-2005... |
Graham 8-Feb-2007 [2708] | same as mine |
Gabriele 9-Feb-2007 [2709] | hmm, was that lost? |
Ladislav 11-Feb-2007 [2710] | my understanding is, that the usage of the /ONLY refinement is an error in cases like: a-string: "" insert/only a-string "ab" currently REBOL just ignores the refinement, what are your preferences? |
Henrik 11-Feb-2007 [2711] | what should /only do for strings? |
Ladislav 11-Feb-2007 [2712] | If you carefully read my post, then you may see that you asked the same question I did |
Henrik 11-Feb-2007 [2713] | ok, sorry, I understood it as if you had the answer and wanted to hear others first. :-) |
Ladislav 11-Feb-2007 [2714] | I just have my preferences, but don't know what the others prefer |
older newer | first last |