World: r3wp
[RAMBO] The REBOL bug and enhancement database
older newer | first last |
Sunanda 17-May-2007 [2902] | Not gone entirely, but happens far less frequenty. Which makes it hard to debug. Very deeply nested blocks with many inserts and removes can trigger it. |
Henrik 17-May-2007 [2903] | I see. Unfortunately it seems I hit it close to every time I do a specific operation, but I have no time to debug it... |
Sunanda 17-May-2007 [2904] | It's annoying! Sometimes just moving code around can fix it. Try making some local words global, for example. |
Henrik 17-May-2007 [2905] | it's actually a showstopper for me and exactly this code needs to be working in front of a customer in about 5 hours.... |
Oldes 17-May-2007 [2906] | I think it would be good to have an example with this bug for sending it to Carl |
Henrik 17-May-2007 [2907x2] | the thing is that its db synchronization code (I'll think out loud here) and it's used in 5-6 different places. only in one place does it crash. |
it seems to be accumulative, since it does not happen in exactly the same spot every tine and is possibly related to Rugby's do-every function, because it seems to happen whenever the do-every is executed. | |
Sunanda 17-May-2007 [2909] | To tell the truth, I don't know what I did with previous versions that actually worked. But doing *something* that affected garbage colection seemd to move the bug around. eg -- global words not local words -- xx: make block! 1000 not xx: copy [] |
Henrik 17-May-2007 [2910x3] | http://rebol.hmkdesign.dk/db-sync.r<-- the db sync code is here. |
sunanda, repeated clears of a block perhaps? | |
I had adopted the techinque of clearing a block before reusage instead of using a new make block! [] Maybe that's a bad idea. | |
Sunanda 17-May-2007 [2913] | Clear -- It's probably a good idea for this reason: the block will grow to its maximum size after repeated uses, and so saves time in memory allocation / block extension. May be a bad idea if that max size is causing problems :-) |
Henrik 17-May-2007 [2914] | allocated 100000 to the first block in the code and it's still running... |
Sunanda 17-May-2007 [2915] | Let's hope that gets you through the demo....Good luck! |
Henrik 17-May-2007 [2916x2] | it crashed again :-( |
I think I'll panic and allocate 100000 elements to every single block in the database | |
Volker 17-May-2007 [2918] | i had such a problem with massive gui and async. Workarounded the following way: recycle is off permanently. there is a thread (do-every or such) which checks how much memory was allocated and when it is to much it recycled. crashing stopped. |
Oldes 17-May-2007 [2919x2] | you may try recycle/off and do it yourself |
:) | |
Volker 17-May-2007 [2921] | ;like if 20 * 1000 * 1000 + stats > last-mem [ recycle . last-mem: stats ] ;and that every 0.01 second or so. |
Oldes 17-May-2007 [2922x2] | anyway.... using make block! [] is quite useless |
allocating 100000 elements for each block will slow down performance too much I guess | |
Volker 17-May-2007 [2924] | Its only for demo, and 3:30 left. better waste memory than a contract.. |
Henrik 17-May-2007 [2925] | with recycle forced off, it seems to be running OK for now |
Oldes 17-May-2007 [2926] | just make sure you recycle sometimes... if it's long running process |
Henrik 17-May-2007 [2927x2] | it will not run more than 2-3 hours today :-) |
ok, it ran perfectly. the demo was approved and the product goes live on Wednesday. | |
Sunanda 17-May-2007 [2929] | Good news! So you have a few days to fix the recycle problem for real :-) |
Henrik 17-May-2007 [2930x2] | actually I'm going to look at a printerserver, which deadlocks, if two people are trying to print too close to eachother. |
it's quite simple, I think it was based on some cookbook code. moving to ports for that... | |
Graham 18-May-2007 [2932] | this is an annoyance ... but 'to-local-file drops the trailing slash for directories |
Henrik 18-May-2007 [2933] | confirmed under OSX |
Graham 18-May-2007 [2934] | Rambo it ?? |
Henrik 18-May-2007 [2935] | yep |
Graham 18-May-2007 [2936] | Ok |
Henrik 18-May-2007 [2937] | it's not a problem the other way around, so yes, it's inconsistent. |
Graham 18-May-2007 [2938] | Done. |
Sunanda 19-May-2007 [2939] | Henrik, I see regular "Crash Should not happen" on one of my scripts, so you are not alone. |
Gabriele 19-May-2007 [2940] | anyone willing to find a way to reproduce it? |
Sunanda 19-May-2007 [2941] | I don't have anything trivial that will trigger the bug. It's a big application that can run for a while before crashing....And the code has been tweaked to minimise the occurrence of the problem. |
Gabriele 19-May-2007 [2942x2] | i feel the pain - same problem i had with chord. |
but at this point (focused on R3) RT does not have enough resources to debug a big app. | |
Henrik 19-May-2007 [2944] | well, if it's about memory allocation and clean up, would there not be a way to torture it? What's the worst possible way to stress the garbage collector? |
Gabriele 19-May-2007 [2945x2] | recycle/torture |
but i guess it won't show in that case... | |
Henrik 19-May-2007 [2947] | something that randomly creates a large amount of blocks, inserts, deletes, manipulates, copies and does various other things. |
Oldes 19-May-2007 [2948x4] | just found, that youtube do not respect HTTP1.0 protocol => sends HTTP1.1 303 response even if client require HTTP1.0 (which is Rebol case). As there is no response specified for 303 in Rebol's http handler, it can be fixed using: use [tmp][ tmp: select second get in system/schemes/http/handler 'open to-set-word 'response-actions if none? find tmp 303 insert tmp reduce [303 select tmp 302] ] |
whith the patch above you should be able to do for example: trace/net on p: open/direct http://www.youtube.com/get_video?video_id=FVbf9tOGwno&t=OEgsToPDskKR0Ng6kANs3Z4VNG81T2tZ error? try [close p] | |
(Reichard: will be fixed the Altme bug which cripples text with long links?) | |
it should be easy imho | |
older newer | first last |