r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[RAMBO] The REBOL bug and enhancement database

Anton
25-May-2007
[2981]
And I think the Importance should be lowered from Critical.
Gabriele
25-May-2007
[2982x2]
i think there was a reason for it being critical... hmm.
anyway - you're right, but even though the target face may never 
be reached, if it is known already it would be good to have it there 
for many reasons.
Graham
25-May-2007
[2984]
why couldn't 4275 be fixed?  Should be easy enough!
Gabriele
25-May-2007
[2985]
because the ticket was created much after the list for 2.7.6 was 
created :-)
Graham
25-May-2007
[2986x3]
oh :(
Why can't we get a directory requestor?
system ...
Gabriele
25-May-2007
[2989]
maybe we should follow reichart's bug fixing rules... but i can't 
redo the list ten times...
Graham
25-May-2007
[2990]
when is the next bug fix cycle?
Gabriele
25-May-2007
[2991]
dir req.......... R3.
Graham
25-May-2007
[2992]
who gets to see R3 on the first of Jun ?
Gabriele
25-May-2007
[2993x2]
next bug fix - no idea. depends on Carl's time.
i don't think there's a fixed list that has been written yet.
Graham
25-May-2007
[2995]
Ahh.. the Carl bottleneck problem.
Gabriele
25-May-2007
[2996]
(personally i want it to be dynamic. like adding people when i have 
some vid stuff to show.)
Graham
25-May-2007
[2997]
So, is chord ready for R3 ? :)
Gabriele
25-May-2007
[2998]
i actually want to  try that out before july... but not sure i'll 
have the time.
Graham
25-May-2007
[2999x2]
Shall I create a R3 list here then ?  :(
:)
Pekr
25-May-2007
[3001x6]
R3 list initial release - BrianH, Anton, Volker, Henrik, Ashley, 
Graham, Gregg, Dockimbel, Sunanda, btiffin ... simply ppl who are 
skilled, and/or actively use Rebol with own projects ...
sorry if I forgot someone :-)
ah, wait, I forgot myself :-)
hmm, well, I can wait till late release. But - I don't like the attitude 
already - "like adding people when i have some vid stuff to show" 
... that simply sucks
we are going thru the same attitude over and over again, for many 
years. First RT blogs, asks, debates, then closes the door and comes 
up with something,not asking if we like it or not ... then complaining, 
that we complain ;-)
IIRC, there should be VID+ group, which was supposed to discuss what 
direction new VID should go. There is many talented ppl with various 
povs here, who could influence some decision in a good way imo ...
btiffin
25-May-2007
[3007]
All right.  Two Brians...We win.

But Pekr;  RT has to be careful with this.  Giving it out to too 
many will just generate

too much noise...  I'd gladly take my name off the list and wait, 
as to not overwhelm

those in more appropriate positions...I'd rather get handed Government 
Reject Unfit

for Normal Training work.  Not that it isn't a nice shiny carrot 
dangling ever so close

to the nose.  And, being a little schizoid, I also agree with you.

I surely hope you allow us to nominate you for Secretary of the (proposed) 

REBOL User Group. The (proposed) Executive Summary could definitely 
use your
candor.  :)
Gabriele
25-May-2007
[3008x2]
petr, remember the open view 1.3 project? the problem it didn't get 
anywhere (despite producing a lot of good code) is that Carl does 
not work that way. we can only aknowledge it.
r3 will be open enough that people will be able to work on it without 
Carl's intervention. but for things that require Carl's intervention 
we follow Carl's rules.
Pekr
25-May-2007
[3010x2]
btiffin - only if group takes some sensible name :-) all those RUGs 
etc. remind me of linux or amiga groups, noone can depict the acronym 
and it sounds ugly, actually nothing I would like to wear on my T-shirt 
:-)
Gabriele - you talk about two distinctive things, but we shold probably 
move from this group.
PeterD
29-May-2007
[3012]
Gabriele,
Can you please take a look at these 2 submissions:

http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?id=4274&
http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?id=4161&


I am desperate because center and left aligned text can not be edited.

Ca you please help?

I convinced myself and 2 others to go REBOL with a small but important 
app I need, but simple stuff like this kills the idea.
Will
29-May-2007
[3013]
Have to agree with Pekr about naming issues!! Let find something 
sexier that anyone would be attracted to 8-).
Anton
29-May-2007
[3014]
You meant, center and *right* aligned text can not be edited.

But yes, this is a long-standing bug, and it's annoyed me a few times.
Actually, this is something that *could* be worked around.

We just need to figure out how caret-to-offset and offset-to-caret 
work, then write mezzanines to replace them. I've been meaning to 
do this for a while.
PeterD
29-May-2007
[3015x2]
Dear Anton,

A mezzanine, that's it. 
I can not tell you how frustrated I am.

See my response to Gabriele below:
Thanks for the info.


It is so sad to see that "little" things are not fixed in a reasonable 
fashion.

Here I am, 99% of my stuff is Center aligned and I find myself "regretting" 
that I go for a "not so established" language.
(never thought that entering text in a box will be a problem)


I have to actually ask 1000 people to klick 4 times more often, just 
to overcome a stupid bug.
So I ask them to:

Change to left align
Edit
Go back to Center align

Repeat as long as needed and pardon, I used "REBOL"

Best regards


So, what is needed to fix this, please let's include Ashley

Thanks a ton for the shimmer of light I see at the end of the tunnel
Peter
Forgot to include Gabriele's response.
The short form is 
Yes, known for ages
No will not be fixed (in 2.7 there is)
Yes the glorious R3 will (probably) fix it
Graham
29-May-2007
[3017]
Known for ages and won't be fixed .... :(
Volker
29-May-2007
[3018]
;Not perfect, but less clicky
view layout [
    style cfield field center feel [
        redraw: func [face act pos] bind [
            if all [in face 'colors block? face/colors] [
                face/color: pick face/colors face <> focal-face
            ]
            foc?: same? face system/view/focal-face
            face/font/align: either foc? ['left] ['center]
        ] system/view
    ]
    cfield "hello" with [focus self]
    cfield "cflied2"
    cfield "cfield3"
]
PeterD
29-May-2007
[3019x2]
Volker, 
Thanks that saves a few, indeed.

My frustation is that we have to be to "REBOLish", a text box is 
as simple as it gets (maybe excluding a label), one can not be forced 
to adapt to the bugs and "adapt" to a new enforced way of editing 
text !!!
Great way of "masking" the problem, I love it!
Gabriele
30-May-2007
[3021]
note, i didn't say "won't be fixed", i said that i find it unlikely 
that Carl will spend more time on 2.7 at this time (ie before july 
15th r3 release).
Pekr
30-May-2007
[3022]
Gabriele - what's behind the date? :-) It is just that Carl decide 
to release R3 at that particular date, or has it any other internal 
meaning? :-)
[unknown: 9]
30-May-2007
[3023]
What more meaning does it need than that Carl said he would do it?
Volker
30-May-2007
[3024]
ie before july 15th r3 ***release***
 :)
Pekr
30-May-2007
[3025x2]
some mystical one, for e.g :-)
or some big announcement - e.g. MS buying RT on that date :-)
Volker
30-May-2007
[3027x3]
Wrong smiley :(
WOuld mean Carl never gets at apple. Maybe google. :)
Or sun. They promote half of the syntax currently.
Pekr
30-May-2007
[3030]
Full REBOL instead of their partial FX? :-)