World: r3wp
[RAMBO] The REBOL bug and enhancement database
older newer | first last |
Anton 25-May-2007 [2981] | And I think the Importance should be lowered from Critical. |
Gabriele 25-May-2007 [2982x2] | i think there was a reason for it being critical... hmm. |
anyway - you're right, but even though the target face may never be reached, if it is known already it would be good to have it there for many reasons. | |
Graham 25-May-2007 [2984] | why couldn't 4275 be fixed? Should be easy enough! |
Gabriele 25-May-2007 [2985] | because the ticket was created much after the list for 2.7.6 was created :-) |
Graham 25-May-2007 [2986x3] | oh :( |
Why can't we get a directory requestor? | |
system ... | |
Gabriele 25-May-2007 [2989] | maybe we should follow reichart's bug fixing rules... but i can't redo the list ten times... |
Graham 25-May-2007 [2990] | when is the next bug fix cycle? |
Gabriele 25-May-2007 [2991] | dir req.......... R3. |
Graham 25-May-2007 [2992] | who gets to see R3 on the first of Jun ? |
Gabriele 25-May-2007 [2993x2] | next bug fix - no idea. depends on Carl's time. |
i don't think there's a fixed list that has been written yet. | |
Graham 25-May-2007 [2995] | Ahh.. the Carl bottleneck problem. |
Gabriele 25-May-2007 [2996] | (personally i want it to be dynamic. like adding people when i have some vid stuff to show.) |
Graham 25-May-2007 [2997] | So, is chord ready for R3 ? :) |
Gabriele 25-May-2007 [2998] | i actually want to try that out before july... but not sure i'll have the time. |
Graham 25-May-2007 [2999x2] | Shall I create a R3 list here then ? :( |
:) | |
Pekr 25-May-2007 [3001x6] | R3 list initial release - BrianH, Anton, Volker, Henrik, Ashley, Graham, Gregg, Dockimbel, Sunanda, btiffin ... simply ppl who are skilled, and/or actively use Rebol with own projects ... |
sorry if I forgot someone :-) | |
ah, wait, I forgot myself :-) | |
hmm, well, I can wait till late release. But - I don't like the attitude already - "like adding people when i have some vid stuff to show" ... that simply sucks | |
we are going thru the same attitude over and over again, for many years. First RT blogs, asks, debates, then closes the door and comes up with something,not asking if we like it or not ... then complaining, that we complain ;-) | |
IIRC, there should be VID+ group, which was supposed to discuss what direction new VID should go. There is many talented ppl with various povs here, who could influence some decision in a good way imo ... | |
btiffin 25-May-2007 [3007] | All right. Two Brians...We win. But Pekr; RT has to be careful with this. Giving it out to too many will just generate too much noise... I'd gladly take my name off the list and wait, as to not overwhelm those in more appropriate positions...I'd rather get handed Government Reject Unfit for Normal Training work. Not that it isn't a nice shiny carrot dangling ever so close to the nose. And, being a little schizoid, I also agree with you. I surely hope you allow us to nominate you for Secretary of the (proposed) REBOL User Group. The (proposed) Executive Summary could definitely use your candor. :) |
Gabriele 25-May-2007 [3008x2] | petr, remember the open view 1.3 project? the problem it didn't get anywhere (despite producing a lot of good code) is that Carl does not work that way. we can only aknowledge it. |
r3 will be open enough that people will be able to work on it without Carl's intervention. but for things that require Carl's intervention we follow Carl's rules. | |
Pekr 25-May-2007 [3010x2] | btiffin - only if group takes some sensible name :-) all those RUGs etc. remind me of linux or amiga groups, noone can depict the acronym and it sounds ugly, actually nothing I would like to wear on my T-shirt :-) |
Gabriele - you talk about two distinctive things, but we shold probably move from this group. | |
PeterD 29-May-2007 [3012] | Gabriele, Can you please take a look at these 2 submissions: http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?id=4274& http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?id=4161& I am desperate because center and left aligned text can not be edited. Ca you please help? I convinced myself and 2 others to go REBOL with a small but important app I need, but simple stuff like this kills the idea. |
Will 29-May-2007 [3013] | Have to agree with Pekr about naming issues!! Let find something sexier that anyone would be attracted to 8-). |
Anton 29-May-2007 [3014] | You meant, center and *right* aligned text can not be edited. But yes, this is a long-standing bug, and it's annoyed me a few times. Actually, this is something that *could* be worked around. We just need to figure out how caret-to-offset and offset-to-caret work, then write mezzanines to replace them. I've been meaning to do this for a while. |
PeterD 29-May-2007 [3015x2] | Dear Anton, A mezzanine, that's it. I can not tell you how frustrated I am. See my response to Gabriele below: Thanks for the info. It is so sad to see that "little" things are not fixed in a reasonable fashion. Here I am, 99% of my stuff is Center aligned and I find myself "regretting" that I go for a "not so established" language. (never thought that entering text in a box will be a problem) I have to actually ask 1000 people to klick 4 times more often, just to overcome a stupid bug. So I ask them to: Change to left align Edit Go back to Center align Repeat as long as needed and pardon, I used "REBOL" Best regards So, what is needed to fix this, please let's include Ashley Thanks a ton for the shimmer of light I see at the end of the tunnel Peter |
Forgot to include Gabriele's response. The short form is Yes, known for ages No will not be fixed (in 2.7 there is) Yes the glorious R3 will (probably) fix it | |
Graham 29-May-2007 [3017] | Known for ages and won't be fixed .... :( |
Volker 29-May-2007 [3018] | ;Not perfect, but less clicky view layout [ style cfield field center feel [ redraw: func [face act pos] bind [ if all [in face 'colors block? face/colors] [ face/color: pick face/colors face <> focal-face ] foc?: same? face system/view/focal-face face/font/align: either foc? ['left] ['center] ] system/view ] cfield "hello" with [focus self] cfield "cflied2" cfield "cfield3" ] |
PeterD 29-May-2007 [3019x2] | Volker, Thanks that saves a few, indeed. My frustation is that we have to be to "REBOLish", a text box is as simple as it gets (maybe excluding a label), one can not be forced to adapt to the bugs and "adapt" to a new enforced way of editing text !!! |
Great way of "masking" the problem, I love it! | |
Gabriele 30-May-2007 [3021] | note, i didn't say "won't be fixed", i said that i find it unlikely that Carl will spend more time on 2.7 at this time (ie before july 15th r3 release). |
Pekr 30-May-2007 [3022] | Gabriele - what's behind the date? :-) It is just that Carl decide to release R3 at that particular date, or has it any other internal meaning? :-) |
[unknown: 9] 30-May-2007 [3023] | What more meaning does it need than that Carl said he would do it? |
Volker 30-May-2007 [3024] | ie before july 15th r3 ***release*** :) |
Pekr 30-May-2007 [3025x2] | some mystical one, for e.g :-) |
or some big announcement - e.g. MS buying RT on that date :-) | |
Volker 30-May-2007 [3027x3] | Wrong smiley :( |
WOuld mean Carl never gets at apple. Maybe google. :) | |
Or sun. They promote half of the syntax currently. | |
Pekr 30-May-2007 [3030] | Full REBOL instead of their partial FX? :-) |
older newer | first last |