World: r3wp
[RAMBO] The REBOL bug and enhancement database
older newer | first last |
Volker 30-May-2007 [3031x2] | If incremental dependency-based evaluation is what i think it is they may have an edge. |
+ platform + swing-widgets. But did not try yet. | |
Dockimbel 30-May-2007 [3033] | >> probe info? %script.r/ make object! [ size: 3405 date: 12-Sep-2000/21:40:20+2:00 type: 'file ] >> read %script.r/ ** Access Error: Cannot open /C/Dev/REBOL/script.r/ ** Near: read %script.r/ Shoudn't INFO? return none (or an error) in this case ? |
Anton 31-May-2007 [3034] | Yes, probably. Which platform are you on ? |
btiffin 31-May-2007 [3035] | Umm is it the trailing slash? |
Anton 31-May-2007 [3036] | If it's Windows, then I expect internally rebol just does this: >> to-local-file %user.r/ == "user.r" stripping the final slash before accessing the file-system. |
btiffin 31-May-2007 [3037x2] | I get the DocKimbel behaviour with 2.7.5.4.2 Linux. But I see the point. Something weird in query...or make port! on files disguised as dir specs... |
Well I don't think it's weird anymore. make port! on %file/ uses scheme: 'directory make port! on %file uses scheme: 'file | |
Dockimbel 4-Jun-2007 [3039x4] | The issue I wanted to point out is just that if it's an existing file!, I should be able to read it ! So instead of letting the user wrongly think that's a file, and let 'read pop an error (which sounds illogical to me), I'm proposition to signal in 'info? that something is wrong with that file! value. |
In my example above, the file! value is explicit, but in cases where it's not, it produces an odd and illogical bug, IMHO. See this other example : | |
specs: info? a-file if specs/type = 'file [ probe read a-file ] ** Access Error: Cannot open /C/Dev/REBOL/script.r/ ** Near: read a-file | |
Anton: yes, Windows | |
Anton 6-Jun-2007 [3043x3] | Doc, ah yes, I think I agree because I seem to remember doing the above sequence myself at some time. |
It is with pleasure that I can announce that there is a workaround to the center / right aligned text highlighting issue. I have a working prototype. You can change the horizontal alignment of the face on the fly. Give me a day or two to clean it up and make a nice demo. | |
(and vertical alignment too !) | |
Ashley 6-Jun-2007 [3046] | Good news, does it involve patching caret-to-offset and/or offset-to-caret (via mezz wrappers)? |
Oldes 10-Jun-2007 [3047x4] | There is a bug in decode-url: >> probe decode-url http://test/path/target?text/something make object! [ user: none pass: none host: "test" port-id: none path: "path/target?text/" target: "something" ] the target should be: target?text/something |
the bug is in the URL-parser of course... there should not be ? char in path-chars | |
Is it so difficult to remove a char from charset or I forgot something? | |
why this is not working? >> remove charset "abc" "a" ** Script Error: Invalid argument: none ** Near: remove charset "abc" "a" when in doc is: Character sets can also be modified with the insert and remove functions, or combinations of sets can be created with the union and intersect functions. | |
Sunanda 10-Jun-2007 [3051] | Charsets don't always respond the way you'd expect -- or support all the operators they could. One way to remove a char: use difference: >> (charset "ac") = (difference charset "abc" charset "b") == true |
Oldes 10-Jun-2007 [3052] | yes.. that's what I forgot... but anyway... removing ? char is not enough:( |
BrianH 11-Jun-2007 [3053x3] | Try this: remove/part charset "abc" "a" |
The /part is necessary when removing from a bitset, | |
The "Invalid argument: none" is just the default value of the second parameter that never gets used if you don't specify /part. | |
Anton 12-Jun-2007 [3056x2] | Ashley, the patching is quite heavy; - caret-to-offset and offset-to-caret replaced by mezzanines (mainly dependent on the TEXTINFO native) - in ctx-text, patched 10 functions and 2 feel objects (should be backwards compatible) - replaced the View rendering of the highlight and caret using several intermediate images (which will be slow for large faces) |
I was disappointed to find that merely patching caret-to-offset and offset-to-caret was not enough to fix the highlight and caret rendering. The View system does not appear to use them. (Maybe the View system keeps direct references to the native functions and does not refer to these global words to get to the native functions ?) This means that ctx-text and focus/unfocus have to be patched to prevent system/view/caret and highlight-start/end being set and thus rendering the highlight and caret. | |
Ashley 12-Jun-2007 [3058] | Could you post/email me just the caret-to-offset and offset-to-caret patches? That should be enough for me to get RebGUI working. Thanks. |
Anton 12-Jun-2007 [3059x2] | Here's what I have so far. (Note, this code may end up in another file.) http://anton.wildit.net.au/rebol/patch/caret-to-offset-patch.r |
Also note, to get the caret and highlight handling / rendering working properly will require you to do in Rebgui the equivalent of the above ctx-text patching etc. That's quite a bit of work. | |
Gabriele 13-Jun-2007 [3061x4] | Oldes, regarding your multiple slashes ticket... |
notice this behavior: | |
>> what-dir == %/home/giesse/ >> read %/ == [%proc/ %initrd/ %sys/ %bin/ %initrd.img %media/ %Recycled/ %srv/ %usr/ %etc/ %boot/ %vmlinuz %lib/ %mnt/ %tmp/ %sbin/ %cdrom/ %... >> read %// == [%.directory %giesse/] >> read %/// == [%Detective/ %.hplip.conf %.teamspeak2/ %.mythtv/ %.qt/ %.fontconfig/ %.clay/ %.Skype/ %.recently-used %.face.icon %.DCOPserver_... | |
REBOL does not ignore multiple slashes. However, this is not documented anywhere, so I'm not sure what the rules should be. | |
Oldes 13-Jun-2007 [3065x2] | so it's bug here: >> make-dir/deep %aaa//bb/ ** Access Error: Cannot open aaa// ** Near: make-dir/deep %aaa//bb/ |
never mind, you can delete it, I already have a solution... anyway... it would be nice to replace the clean-path function with the Anton's simple-clean-path | |
Chris 16-Jun-2007 [3067] | any [get/any 'no-word "Alt"] ; should this return "Alt" ? |
btiffin 17-Jun-2007 [3068] | Chris; Umm, not according to help any. It returns the first value that is not false or none. So I guess unset! counts. :) But you're right. unset! should be more false than true. |
Anton 19-Jun-2007 [3069x5] | I've finally done it. Here is an AREA/FIELD style which handles and renders the caret much better with center and right-aligned text: |
First run View 2.7.5.3.1 and do this: site: select load-thru http://www.rebol.net/reb/index.r[folder "Anton"] clear find site %index.r load-thru/update site/patch/caret-to-offset-patch.r Do the main demo, showing patched AREA: do-thru site/patch/demo-caret-to-offset-patch.r Three patched styles; AREA, FIELD, INFO: do-thru site/gui/demo-area.r do-thru site/gui/demo-field.r do-thru site/gui/demo-info.r The initial experimental testing script: do-thru site/patch/test-caret-to-offset-patch.r | |
Advantages: - middle and right aligned text is now usable and works as one would expect, with the caret appearing in the correct position. - you can render the caret how you like - you can render the highlighting how you like (I didn't show the above options clearly in the demos yet, you must still get your programming fingers dirty) Disadvantages: - lots of code to achieve the above - probably slow performance with large areas, because images are being created on every redraw | |
I should have announced that in the View group, sorry. | |
(oh well, I guess it's one big bug workaround) | |
PeterD 20-Jun-2007 [3074] | Thanks Anton |
Anton 20-Jun-2007 [3075x2] | Cool, let me know any problems. |
To maybe fit in better with other styles, the caret colour can be changed. eg: area with [append init [named-colours: make named-colours [caret: black]]] | |
Graham 28-Jun-2007 [3077] | rambo'd https posting bug. |
btiffin 29-Jun-2007 [3078] | Can I get someone to try this before I report it. foreach [e s] to block! {thing 'word} [compose [e (get s)]] segfaults 1.3.2.4.2 and 2.7.5.4.2 |
Graham 29-Jun-2007 [3079] | linux version |
btiffin 29-Jun-2007 [3080] | yep |
older newer | first last |