World: r3wp
[RAMBO] The REBOL bug and enhancement database
older newer | first last |
Anton 26-Jul-2005 [935] | Thanks Gabriele, I am going to investigate some more. Perhaps you can add a comment to the report to change the doc instead (or at least). |
Gregg 26-Jul-2005 [936] | In the works Anton. Thanks! |
Anton 26-Jul-2005 [937] | Thank you, Gregg. |
Graham 26-Jul-2005 [938x2] | well, the new rebcommand finally crashed on me too though took much longer than previously. Usage jumped to 50% as before and stayed there. I guess on a non hyperthreaded cpu, it would have jumped to 100%. |
It's looking like I need to ditch odbc and move to using doc's mysql instead. | |
Anton 27-Jul-2005 [940x5] | Thanks again Gabriele. Even though I've read that document several times over the years, and styled many widgets, somehow I kept getting confused by OVER. It was that particular phrase "The over function is called whenever the mouse pointer passes over or off of a face." Every time I re-read it I believed it :) |
Anyway, now the doc is fixed I feel a lot better. | |
Gabriele, #3112 shows a different issue and should not be dismissed. (I admit my last bug report was a little bit crazy, and I'm sorry about that.) | |
Ach! too hasty again. That issue can be solved by using OVER in combination with DETECT. That misunderstanding was caused by the same wording in the documentation of OVER. I will make an example for that too. | |
Actually, maybe I am not too hasty. I am struggling to come up with an example that works as I want with the help of DETECT. | |
sqlab 27-Jul-2005 [945] | Jaime: Unfortunately I will not have so much access to the data and the time to anonymize it the next days for familial reasons. When I am back, i will go on. |
Gabriele 27-Jul-2005 [946x2] | #3112 was dismissed by Carl, so I guess he knew what he was doing. :-) |
(or he was too quick too, i'll ask him anyway.) | |
Anton 28-Jul-2005 [948x4] | Thanks Gabriele! This is actually a burning issue for me! I felt a bit ignored by that. Anyway, I have been researching, and I found the bug note: http://www.rebol.com/docs/view-system.html "Bug Note: On current versions of REBOL, the event/face within the detect function is not set to the proper value. It should indicate the target face of the event, not the face in which the detect event is used." If that is fixed, then it should be possible to filter conditionally to face or subfaces, eg. detect: func [face event][ if face = event/face [event] ; return event for this face, but none for subfaces ] and hopefully if a face does that, then it should get all 'over and 'away events, regardless of subfaces. That is, to be able to know at any time whether the mouse is in its rectangular area or not. |
So I'm just going to check, but there should be a bug tracker item for this bug. | |
I searched for "detect" and did not find a ticket. So I will make one. | |
Ok, submitted a ticket. | |
Volker 28-Jul-2005 [952] | i think then detect should get both faces? also, isn't the source-face somewhere in the event? (asking, i am no expert there) |
Gabriele 29-Jul-2005 [953x2] | about #3112: "BTW, the reason I dismissed it is because his test example seems invalid. He needs to add an over feel to the face in the pane. There may be one issue however... which is that when moving from blue back to red, a FALSE over action does not occur. However, have him submit with short and precise description and an example that does not use VID. (He can cut and paste the similar over example from the doc then modify it.)" |
(quote from Carl | |
Anton 29-Jul-2005 [955x3] | OK, excellent feedback. I have been doing just that the last couple of days, following the style of the new documentation. |
About the example being invalid. The subface has no feel intentionally by me. It is my opinion that the box face should not care about faces lower down in the chain in order to detect if the mouse is over itself or not. | |
OK, I'm going to do more preparation so I have the clearest example ever. :) | |
Volker 29-Jul-2005 [958x5] | binding problem when making objects from objects: |
probe system/version c1: context [dmy: 0 v1: 1 f: does[v1]] c2: context [dmy: 0 v2: 2 f2: does[v2]] c3: make c2 c1 probe c3/v1 probe c3/v2 probe c3/f probe c3/f2 print"other way round" c3: make c1 c2 probe c3/v1 probe c3/v2 probe c3/f probe c3/f2 | |
2.6.0.4.2 1 2 2 2 other way round 1 2 1 1 | |
the results of the functions are wrong. they take always the first value in the object, where the word was on construction. not the index the word has after the make. | |
rambo? | |
Gabriele 29-Jul-2005 [963] | seems a bug to me. |
Volker 29-Jul-2005 [964x2] | i go reporting. |
done | |
Anton 31-Jul-2005 [966] | Yep, looks that way. |
Ladislav 31-Jul-2005 [967] | since when was this make c2 c1 or make c1 c2 possible? (I thought that the second arg had to be a block?) |
Sunanda 31-Jul-2005 [968] | The 2nd arg is an integer when making many other datatypes (usually meaning the amount of space to allocate for it initially) make block! 2222 ;; block with reserved space for 2,222 entries. 3rd arg needed in some cases too: f: make function! [a b] [print a + b] |
Volker 31-Jul-2005 [969] | Don't know when, but old. IIRC older than 'construct. in a way its the predecessor of construct/with . And as such, with only data, there is no problem anyway. but can be used to merge objects too, kind of multiple inheritance. i thought.. ;) |
Gabriele 31-Jul-2005 [970] | Ladislav: it's on view 1.2.1 too. so I guess very old. |
Ladislav 31-Jul-2005 [971] | apparently nobody used it, because this error never showed up |
Volker 31-Jul-2005 [972] | I used it primarily for data, to add default fields. item: make context[ defaults ] load %item.r there are no functions, so no problem. now thats construct/with, even no binding nowhere :) But lately i did something obscure and it drove me made.. |
sqlab 1-Aug-2005 [973] | Rambo #3869 "** CRASH (Should not happen) - Invalid string width 16 : type 41" sounds very similar to the problem I have with cmd. Just that I have to wait a few thousand messages and at least two days for one crash. |
Sunanda 1-Aug-2005 [974] | Izkata has found a way to speed up your bug 1,000% :-) |
Izkata 1-Aug-2005 [975] | -.-' |
Ammon 1-Aug-2005 [976] | The /part refinement of copy requires a number! series! or port! value. But it seems that it should be able to accept a NONE value as well. |
Oldes 4-Aug-2005 [977x2] | is this known bug?: |
>> parse/all {" x} "" == [" x"] >> parse {" x} "" == [" x"] | |
Volker 10-Aug-2005 [979x2] | linux-1.3: nameclash: /link wants ~/.rebol as file. /view now wants a directory there. I guess we have to rename, ~/rebol.d ? |
At least until a /link-1.3 is out. | |
[unknown: 10] 10-Aug-2005 [981x4] | Linux 1.3 Beta -> do read http://www.rebol.net/tests/arc-angle.r does work strange on [arc 100x100 90x90 0 0 closed] |
Linux 1.3 Beta -> startup reports this -> ** Access Error: Cannot open /home/usersx/.rebol/view/desktop/filetypes.r ** Where: init-desktop-files ** Near: write path join {REBOL [Title: "File Types"] } mold/only >> | |
Looks like view is faster in 1.3 ??? :-) | |
Linux 1.3 Beta -> I need to give an extra do-events for view actions to make a face... | |
older newer | first last |