r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Core] Discuss core issues

Maxim
10-Jun-2010
[16983x2]
yeah, I guess you're right... I didn't think about it this way.


its the purpose of a word to evaluate its content, and get-words 
to return them un-evaluated.


still, this specific case isn't very obvious.  guess I put my "newbie 
hat" for a few minutes there  ;-)
in a dialect, via block-parsing, this is a very tricky detail!
Ladislav
10-Jun-2010
[16985]
I suggested quite a few times to Carl to specifically suppress this, 
but my proposal was not accepted in this case, maybe if you wrote 
it as a CureCode wish, Carl would find out I am not the only one 
suggesting it?
Steeve
10-Jun-2010
[16986x2]
As Iskata underlined it, i don't see anything specific.
a -> is evalatued, :a is not.

The VM always tries to evaluates/reduces the words, not the get-words.
*evaluated, *Izkata
Maxim
10-Jun-2010
[16988]
but lit words are a datatype.   when such a lit word is encountered 
in a do block and evaluated, it is reduced to a word.  that is ok.


but when it is *stored* AS as a lit-word, it should not be evaluated. 
 remember that words may contain words, which will be evaluated.


so why should lit-words be evaluated too?  the basic word containing 
a word already does that.
Steeve
10-Jun-2010
[16989]
Hmm... let me check that...
Maxim
10-Jun-2010
[16990x5]
the specific is that 

a: 'z      and     a: to-lit-word 'z

are not equal expressions.

so why should evaluating a also evaluate z in the second form.
since it will in the first form.
its the same as saying that blocks would ALWAYS be reduce everytime 
you evaluate a word which holds a block.
to me a lit-word is not a reference, its a token.  nothing more. 
 so evaluating one should just return itself, like strings & blocks.
sorry... evaluating a *word* which holds a lit-word, should just 
return the original lit-word.
Steeve
10-Jun-2010
[16995]
Ok I see your point now.

But I have to admit I've never been bored by this cascade evaluation.scheme 
:)
Graham
10-Jun-2010
[16996]
@Gab .. since the sub-port is closed, it can't receive events to 
pass on to the main port so yes, it shouldn't receive any more events.


Just wondering why putting a 'true in the handler at the end of the 
'close event handler also causes REBOL to exit the View event handler 
as well ...
Maxim
10-Jun-2010
[16997]
it quits the wait []  call.

the same happens if you return true from the view wake-event.
Graham
10-Jun-2010
[16998x2]
I guess it must.
In the async-http ( or any other protocol ), when exactly is the 
'init function called?
Graham
11-Jun-2010
[17000x2]
Something I'd forgotten ... but you can set custom headers using 
the header keyword.  Not documented though.

read/custom url [ header [ cookie: "blah blah" ]]

The header keyword is not needed if you do a post though.
Anyway, my async-fetch-s3object is now working :)
Gabriele
11-Jun-2010
[17002x4]
Oldes - "only if the string contains new line or " char" - that's 
wrong. It depends on the string length. also, mold escapes characters 
the REBOL way which you DON'T want.
>> "a long string"
== "a long string"

>> "a very long string with no newlines or quote characters, that 
still uses braces instead of quotes because it's long"

== {a very long string with no newlines or quote characters, that 
still uses braces instead of quotes because it's long}
the init function is called when the port is created from a url! 
or block! spec. eg. p: make port! ahttp://...
calling OPEN on a url! or block! spec also creates the port! first, 
so init is called.
Graham
11-Jun-2010
[17006]
So, after the port is created ..
Gabriele
11-Jun-2010
[17007]
i think the native code does some very basic initialization of the 
port! then it calls init
Graham
11-Jun-2010
[17008]
ok.  thanks.
Henrik
12-Jun-2010
[17009x2]
Is there a good method to conditionally remove a char in a string 
without having to manage the string? That is: Find char X at location 
Y and remove it if it's there, otherwise just return the string as 
is.
good method = fast method
Steeve
12-Jun-2010
[17011]
the first occurence only ?
Henrik
12-Jun-2010
[17012x2]
yes, I was thinking of the case of removing a conditional comma at 
the tail of an assembled string as quickly as possible.
first occurrence = just one occurrence
Steeve
12-Jun-2010
[17014]
something like...
head any [remove find string char string]
Henrik
12-Jun-2010
[17015]
hmm.. yes, that might work, thanks
Steeve
12-Jun-2010
[17016x2]
Parse  may be faster, though
especially within R3
Henrik
12-Jun-2010
[17018]
hmm, the string is required to be present twice, but I guess that's 
ok.
Steeve
12-Jun-2010
[17019]
Probably a little faster with R3...
also string remove find string char
Graham
12-Jun-2010
[17020]
Regarding Romano's atcp protocol, http://www.rebol.it/romano/atcp-protocol.r
 there is a little bug at the bottom of the page I think

He has 
		if find system/components 'ssl [
			net-utils/net-install 'assl self 0
			net-utils/net-install 'atsl self 0
		]

but I think he meant

		if find system/components 'ssl [
			net-utils/net-install 'assl self 0
			net-utils/net-install 'atls self 0
		]
Andreas
12-Jun-2010
[17021]
Good catch, Graham
Graham
12-Jun-2010
[17022x2]
I emailed him.... hope he has time to spare from his Java development 
to fix it :)
Gab's async protocol, the awake event takes two parameters
Romano's atcp protocol, the awake event takes one parameter ....
Anton
12-Jun-2010
[17024]
Oldes, I get braces when string length > 50
>> mold loop 51 [append "" "."]
== {{...................................................}}
Gabriele
13-Jun-2010
[17025]
Graham, though, tls:// never worked in REBOL so... :)
Graham
13-Jun-2010
[17026]
Carl keeps saying otherwise :)
Henrik
13-Jun-2010
[17027x3]
does anyone use str-enc-utils.r? I'm not sure if I have found a bug.
actually there is not just a bug, but also a hang.
>> str-enc-utils/iso-8859-15-to-utf-8 "aø"
== "" ; bad
>> str-enc-utils/iso-8859-15-to-utf-8 "ø"
== "ø" ; good
>> str-enc-utils/iso-8859-1-to-utf-8 "aø" ; hangs
Steeve
13-Jun-2010
[17030]
Link plz...
Henrik
13-Jun-2010
[17031x2]
http://www.rebol.org/view-script.r?script=str-enc-utils.r
hmm.. that one is newer. I have to test that one. one sec.