World: r3wp
[Core] Discuss core issues
older newer | first last |
Sunanda 30-Aug-2010 [18081] | (opps -- my enter key got reset somehow) 1. hire me at a reasonable rate as your official scapegoat 2. make yourself potentially a billion times safer (so no need for a scapegoat) by adding something to the checksum string -- eg: k: rejoin [random/secure enbase checksum/secure to-string now/precise random/secure 100'000'000] 3. read up on UUID / GUID generation, eg: http://www.rebol.org/ml-display-thread.r?m=rmlCYYK |
Maxim 30-Aug-2010 [18082x2] | sunanda, for your timing issue in generating unique keys, use my precise time module it NEVER returns the same time twice, the counter is CPu based. |
i usually use a random string generated on app startup, the time and a random value at each call. purists will tell you not to use the system time for the random seed . it creates a time frame of attack which vastly reduces the number of hits required for brute force attacks. use two independent system data values like disk free size, & a measured I/O divided by each other. a single digit off generates a completely different seed, so its much better and cannot be guestimaged easily by the attacker. | |
Graham 30-Aug-2010 [18084] | I just ask the user to think of a number |
Gabriele 31-Aug-2010 [18085x2] | This is what I often use: >> random/seed now >> enbase checksum/secure random mold system/error == "EZHHHYzUpj78+Eab+Y8vygt75ZA=" |
Of course, if you are running on a real operating system, you can get better "randomness" using: >> p: open/binary/direct %/dev/urandom >> enbase copy/part p 16 == "2Fm5zVhMBCgQkdQ3afEpYw==" >> enbase copy/part p 32 == "Ymk3t6HyAgKNzpALcvGSXyV6poSDwRzk5pCR7IoDz68=" >> close p | |
caelum 3-Sep-2010 [18087] | I'm a newbie to Rebol. I need to know how to delete a file on my website. I tried uploading a file using: write ftp://user:[pass-:-website-:-com]/myfile.enc myfile.enc which does not work because of the ['-:-'] in the user name. I tried replacing the ['-:-'] with '%40', still did not work. So I tried the following which works: ftp-port: [ scheme: 'ftp host: "ftp.mysite.org" port-id: 21 user: "[user-:-mysite-:-org]" pass: "xxxxxxxxxxxxx" target: %myfile.enc ] file: read %myfile.enc write/binary ftp-port file So now my file is on my server. My question is - How do I delete this file? I see no way to tell the Delete command the name of the file on my server so it can delete it. And: delete ftp://user:[pass-:-website-:-com]/myfile.enc does not work for the same reason the standard velsion of write does not work, because of the ['-:-'] in the user name. Any help much appreciated. |
Graham 3-Sep-2010 [18088x2] | delete [ scheme: 'ftp host: "ftp.mysite.org" port-id: 21 user: "[user-:-mysite-:-org]" pass: "xxxxxxxxxxxxx" target: %myfile.enc ] does that work? |
No, delete does not take a file spec | |
caelum 3-Sep-2010 [18090] | I just found that out. |
Graham 3-Sep-2010 [18091x2] | Try this http://rebol.wik.is/Protocols/Ftp See the file attached at the bottom do %prot-ftp.r then, do this delete ftp://user%2540mysite.org:[pass-:-ftp-:-mysite-:-org]/myfile.enc |
Hold the guimauve | |
caelum 3-Sep-2010 [18093] | I had to type that all out very slowly and carefully, long password, and I don't use the shell much these days (I'm an old Amigan). YES it worked! Thanks Graham. I'll add the guimauve, they do look delicious. Help me out much more and end up delivering a feast. So I imagine I need to include prot-ftp.r in my Rebol programs and I'll be able to use the standard way of accessing files on my server? Am I right? Thanks for all the help, this will get me going now. |
Graham 3-Sep-2010 [18094] | I had an Amiga 1000 bought in 1985 ... always used the shell there :) |
caelum 3-Sep-2010 [18095] | Yep, those were the days :) My Amiga 4000 finally died in 2002. That's when I switched to linux. No more Amiga :( |
Graham 3-Sep-2010 [18096x2] | You can try this .... instead of loading up the ftp protocol, system/schemes/ftp/handler/open-check: [none ["220" "230"] ["USER" dehex port/user] "331" ["PASS" port/pass] "230" "SYST" "*"] |
ie. patch the scheme in memory | |
caelum 3-Sep-2010 [18098] | Patch the scheme in memory, OK I'll give that a go. I'm on a steep learning curve here. |
Graham 3-Sep-2010 [18099] | In REBOL, all code is just data ... |
caelum 3-Sep-2010 [18100x4] | But I'm getting the idea. |
'All code is just data'. That's what I like about Rebol. | |
system/schemes/ftp/handler/open-ftp - Is that on windows? I don't have anything like that here on linux. | |
Just found it. It's in /home/user/Rebol/source. | |
Graham 3-Sep-2010 [18104x3] | eh?? |
system is a REBOL object | |
it's open-check .. not open-ftp | |
Henrik 3-Sep-2010 [18107] | ? system/schemes/ftp/handler will show you what resides inside the handler |
caelum 3-Sep-2010 [18108x4] | Sorry, my typing error. I found open-check in /home/user/Rebol/source/prot-ftp.r and changed it to your code above, and it works! I have Rebol in my home folder, not in any of the linux (Ubuntu) system folders. |
prot-ftp.r is a file in my home folder. I hope that makes sense. Anyway, your code works :) | |
I have the sdk! | |
With a license. | |
Graham 3-Sep-2010 [18112] | sure .. you can patch it so that you just encap it later on |
caelum 3-Sep-2010 [18113] | Sadly, I have yet to get encap to work on linux (Ubuntu). I'll figure that one out later. For now my goal is to just get everything working. I'll not be passing out programs for others to use for another few months. That's when I'll need encap. |
Henrik 3-Sep-2010 [18114] | Hopefully you have a Linux SDK license? |
caelum 3-Sep-2010 [18115x2] | I do, and a windows one. |
You can tell I'm serious about switching to Rebol. | |
Henrik 3-Sep-2010 [18117] | yes, that's always good :-) |
Graham 3-Sep-2010 [18118] | http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?id=-4777& Delete does not take a port spec ( Gabriele are you still reviewing Rambo submissions? ) |
Gabriele 3-Sep-2010 [18119] | I think that can be worked around by using REMOVE on the port opened on the directory that contains the file... worth testing maybe. Anyway, yes. Ticket is now #4401. |
Graham 3-Sep-2010 [18120] | Would this stop rebol working ? http://downloads.zdnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=2111429&tag=nl.e530 |
Maxim 4-Sep-2010 [18121] | i don't think so. |
Graham 13-Sep-2010 [18122x2] | Henrik, what's this bug regarding 'encloak that you have mentioned on your blog? |
encloak uses SHA1 I think | |
Henrik 13-Sep-2010 [18124] | Graham, link? I can't remember that blog entry. |
Graham 13-Sep-2010 [18125x3] | This is BSD C code for SHA 224 - 512 ... can someone review this to see if we can include in 2.7.8 ? |
http://www.hmkdesign.dk/rebol/files/category-rebol-3.html | |
http://www.ouah.org/ogay/sha2/ | |
Henrik 13-Sep-2010 [18128] | I can't remember what the bug was. It may have been fixed in the meantime. |
Graham 13-Sep-2010 [18129x2] | I looked on rambo and saw no entries for encloak |
35kb of C source | |
older newer | first last |