World: r3wp
[Core] Discuss core issues
older newer | first last |
Tomc 22-Oct-2005 [2432x2] | which means the server cannot take advantage of the fact the body is the same on all the messages and just spam/virus filter it once. |
(having this issue on a list of 2500) | |
Graham 22-Oct-2005 [2434] | If you want, you can write your own send command that does what you want. |
Gabriele 23-Oct-2005 [2435x3] | Let's make this clear: SEND is not an email client. SEND is a function to send email. If it was an email client, it owuld just show a window with the ability to send TO, CC, BCC and so on, with a send button in it... |
what send does is: taking a message, and sending it to the list of recipients you provide. That's what any MTA does too. | |
the user interface for mailers, though, of course do more than that. TO, CC and BCC are part of the user interface. | |
Graham 23-Oct-2005 [2438x2] | Hmm. SMTP allows the sender to make multiple RCPT TO commands before sending the body of the message once - which then gets sent to the addressees of the RCPT TO. |
This is how your email client would implement a CC or BCC. | |
Gabriele 23-Oct-2005 [2440] | yep, just like SEND. |
Graham 23-Oct-2005 [2441] | I don't know how 'send works ... but I assume it does only a single RCPT TO ? |
Gabriele 23-Oct-2005 [2442] | depends on refinements. i don't recall if it does one with a list of emails, or several with one email address each. |
Graham 23-Oct-2005 [2443] | I think it sends it multiple times. |
Gabriele 23-Oct-2005 [2444] | SEND with multiple recipients sends a copy to each recipient; SEND/ONLY sends the same message to many recipients |
Izkata 23-Oct-2005 [2445x3] | I don't see the use of using /only, really... With /show, I see all recipients whether or not /only is there - and without /show, with /only, it won't show any email address, and without /only, just it only shows the recipient. |
(without /only, without show for that last one) | |
(/show) | |
Graham 24-Oct-2005 [2448] | Quick question .. how do you set the century to-date defaults to ? >> to-date "1/10/40" == 1-Oct-2040 is not what I want. |
Anton 24-Oct-2005 [2449] | >> to-date "1/10/1040" == 1-Oct-1040 |
Graham 24-Oct-2005 [2450x2] | but what I want is last century ! |
Many languages have a way to set the window in which dates work. | |
Volker 24-Oct-2005 [2452x2] | WOuld own handlling work? Where do you get the dates from? always "1/10/40"? |
(i guess there is nothing inbuild, but would be pleasanly surprised if i am wrong :) | |
Graham 24-Oct-2005 [2454x2] | I want to automatically set a window so I can deal with dates - for birthdates and appts. |
If I have to, I will have to write my own mezzaine - just was hoping that Rebol had something built in. | |
Volker 24-Oct-2005 [2456] | I guess that step must be made in the conversion, to check if date is 2 or 4 digits. |
Graham 24-Oct-2005 [2457] | I guess when it was coded, it was set to make everything the current century .. after all Rebol was invented last century. |
Volker 24-Oct-2005 [2458] | if you know its 2, you can then make a quick check. if date > 2035 [date: date - 100] |
Graham 24-Oct-2005 [2459] | yeah .. |
Volker 24-Oct-2005 [2460] | so we need a to-date/window ? How to deal with different formats? |
Graham 24-Oct-2005 [2461] | what different formats? |
Volker 24-Oct-2005 [2462] | thought to-date understands ultiple formats. if its always */year its a short check. |
Graham 24-Oct-2005 [2463] | yes, I thought using /year is what is needed. |
Volker 24-Oct-2005 [2464] | there are some more mentioned in the word-browser. if always "/", if 2 = length? find/last "/" .. |
Graham 24-Oct-2005 [2465x2] | to-date: func [ value /local tmp ][ tmp: to date! :value if tmp/year > ( now/year + 10 ) [ tmp/year: tmp/year - 100 ] tmp] |
this ensures that years more than 10 ahead get changed | |
Volker 24-Oct-2005 [2467x2] | explicit 4 digits are not necessary? |
but quick solution :) | |
Graham 24-Oct-2005 [2469] | Since we don't have control over the field .. users will enter 2 digits sometimes |
Volker 24-Oct-2005 [2470] | i mean user can enter 2025 explicitely. that gets 1925. |
Graham 24-Oct-2005 [2471x3] | well, I see ... he made a mistake. |
In my application .. you are not allowed to deal with dates too distant. | |
:) | |
Ladislav 24-Oct-2005 [2474] | this solution: >> 24/10/55 == 24-Oct-1955 >> 24/10/54 == 24-Oct-2054 |
Volker 24-Oct-2005 [2475] | ok, than this is enough. but people get older in the future! (hopefully) |
Ladislav 24-Oct-2005 [2476] | is considered "standard", but it doesn't look ideal for medicine applications |
Anton 24-Oct-2005 [2477x3] | I would require users to enter four digits. Get them used to being precise. |
sorry "we don't have control of the field..." | |
mmm.. so you have to guess. A bad situation. | |
Graham 24-Oct-2005 [2480] | Hey, living users won't have to worry about the next century!! |
Volker 24-Oct-2005 [2481] | i would use grhams solution and feed what rebol sees back into the input-field. so user sees something is wrong. |
older newer | first last |