r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Core] Discuss core issues

JaimeVargas
3-Feb-2006
[3365]
This is what I called gotchas.
Henrik
5-Feb-2006
[3366]
how do you test for a function that returns nothing? I want to DO 
a script, and check if there was an error, but the script might sometimes 
not return anything
Volker
5-Feb-2006
[3367x3]
!>>error? [()]
== false
!>>unset? ()    
== true
!>>attempt[() true]
== true
!>>attempt[1 / 0 true] 
== none
Anton
6-Feb-2006
[3370]
if error? set/any 'err try [do %script.r][print mold disarm err]
DideC
6-Feb-2006
[3371x3]
MichaelB: about the path problem in request-dir, it's a bug in the 
code.


The simple solution is to patch this line (in request-dir func at 
the end of the script :
	if not all [keep path] [path: any [where what-dir]]
like this :
	if not all [keep path] [path: copy any [where what-dir]]
the 'path word is local to ctx-req-dir context and the Rebol path 
must not be changed by it. It's up to the "user code" to change it 
if he wants to.
But I agree that Rebol should check if path is "complete" (trailing 
"/") before using it in read/save/load/... functions
Pekr
9-Feb-2006
[3374x4]
I have got question from Bobik, to which I don't know answer ... 
I tracked the problem, but dunno why it is as it is :-)
blk: [1 false]

if blk/2 [print 123]
he was wondering, why it is true .... I found out after checking 
the type? blk/2, which is - word! .... my question is why it is word! 
and not logic! ?
blk/1 is integer!, why false here is not logic! ? anyone? thanks 
:-)
Sunanda
9-Feb-2006
[3378x2]
blk: reduce [1 false]   ;; to correctly evaluate the block contents
I guess it's analogous to:
  blk: [1 make object! [a: 1]]
  print blk/2
      make
Ashley
9-Feb-2006
[3380]
blk: [1 #[false]]
Pekr
9-Feb-2006
[3381x2]
ok, thanks ... I think now I understand ... yesterday I read about 
Haskell and functional languages ...
Bobik used str: "[1 false]" val: load str ... so basically, he "executed" 
(evaluated) string, he got block, but he forgot to do the same for 
block content - so here reduce comes in the play ...
Sunanda
9-Feb-2006
[3383]
It can be annoying because reduce does not have a /deep refinement 
-- so if you load nested blocks, you may need to do a lot of reduces 
to make it work:
   xx: reduce  load " [ false [ true]]"
   == [false [true]]
   type? xx/1
   == logic!
    type? xx/2/1
   == word!
Pekr
9-Feb-2006
[3384]
I wonder if not being strongly typed (as Haskell claims they are), 
does not lead to almost untrackable bugs ... yesterday, working with 
debugger with our Ubicom CPU, I started to wodner, how we can live 
without the debugger in REBOL :-(
MikeL
9-Feb-2006
[3385]
I''ve been caught-22 on that many times since I like to set my ini 
file definitions to be readable blocks and don't follow why other 
data types are correctly recognized e.g. blk: [1 12-feb-2006 $30.00] 
 but not true or false or Yes or No  without a reduce.  If you use 
blocks for the ini file settings you get caught by the reduce  e.g. 
if want this ini: [	clean-up-target-directory? Yes start-at 10:30:01 
first-day-to-run 12-dec-2006 last-day-to-run 31-dec-2006] reduce 
requires me to flag the words as 'words.
Sunanda
9-Feb-2006
[3386x2]
I tend to use nested objects as records stored in files. They suffer 
the same problem.

My solution is a single read function hat runs through reducing things.
Petr: having only 'trace or inserted 'print for debugging is like 
going back to the dark ages.
Better debugging would be a great step forward.
Henrik
9-Feb-2006
[3388x2]
debugger? does a tool like this exist for REBOL? http://www.hmkdesign.dk/rebol/reblog/reblog.html
it's practically automated testing and probe on serious steroids 
:-)
Sunanda
9-Feb-2006
[3390]
Looks great!
Any release date?
Henrik
9-Feb-2006
[3391]
I could release it now, but it's very, very buggy and it's not shielded 
from the program context
Sunanda
9-Feb-2006
[3392]
You need to decide if you have the time now to deal with the bugs 
people will issue.  If not, wait til it is more stable.
Henrik
9-Feb-2006
[3393x3]
http://www.hmkdesign.dk/rebol/tester/tester.r
consider it a flimsy prototype. requires list-view.r to be in the 
same path as the script
please don't submit suggestions or bug reports at this point
Pekr
9-Feb-2006
[3396x2]
heh, cool :-)
Henrik - wrong link to list-view on the above reblog.html .... /reblog/ 
in the path should not be there ...
Gabriele
9-Feb-2006
[3398]
true and false - just use mold/all or save/all.
Pekr
9-Feb-2006
[3399]
well, imo Bobik has this block as some result of form field get-values 
function :-)
Gabriele
9-Feb-2006
[3400]
is the user typing true and false in?
Pekr
9-Feb-2006
[3401]
dunno, would have to ask him, once I catch him on icq ... but - I 
think it is OK, I explained to him why he needs to reduce the block 
...
DideC
9-Feb-2006
[3402]
Henrik: just for info, there is CSS styles junks at the top of some 
pages like this one (in IE6 almost) http://www.hmkdesign.dk/rebol/reblog/files/category-3.html
Volker
9-Feb-2006
[3403]
#[true] etc.
Henrik
9-Feb-2006
[3404x2]
didec: odd. maybe not the entire page was uploaded. my internet connection 
is very bad right now
pekr, link fixed
Sunanda
9-Feb-2006
[3406]
Thanks Gabriele --- save/all neatly does the job.

No use to me though in several cases -- I support  applications that 
pre-date that refinement and run under older versions of core.
But it'll save me a chore in future apps.
Henrik
10-Feb-2006
[3407]
hmm... seems I forgot there are some LIST-VIEW 0.0.29 only functions 
used in Tester. maybe I should do a release soon....
Gregg
10-Feb-2006
[3408x2]
Another new feature that may help is the /ONLY refinement on REDUCE.
Very cool idea Henrik. Keep us posted.
Graham
10-Feb-2006
[3410]
Does any one have a tool for examining large objects?   I'm trying 
to find where things are defined in beer, and using an editor to 
browse the port object is not fun.  A sort of anamonitor for objects?
Gregg
10-Feb-2006
[3411]
port! values don't support the use of FIRST to get their words (AFAIK). 
At least I think that's what I ran into trying to support them in 
my old object browser.
Graham
10-Feb-2006
[3412]
where's your object browser Gregg?
Henrik
10-Feb-2006
[3413]
graham, did you try the object browser in Viewtop/Tools ?
Graham
10-Feb-2006
[3414]
Nope .. ;)