World: r3wp

rebdb is very easy too ... we now have even sqlite drivers ...

If anyone else wanna see the website powered by REBOL and running 
my NicomDB, write me privately.

Looks ok, nothing broke while I was fiddling with the website. :-) 
That's encouraging but not conclusive of how well it can really perform.

It's running on a FreeBSD server, so it's pretty robust. It hasn't 
been rebooted since July last summer.

is it on-disk db or memory based as rebdb is?

We had some problems with Netcraft sending strange HTTP headers, 
that sometimes made our REBOL application hiccup, but that should 
be solved.

Pekr, data is on-disk, multi-user locking is in memory.

interesting ... binary or plain text based? sql interface? :-)

Pekr, REBOL datatype based (so text, but you can store binary data).

Pekr, no SQL interface yet. I started to do a SQL interface doing 
my education, but didn't finish it. SQL is crap. ;)

why we did not know about this interesting project earlier? :-) was 
it private?

hehe, well. My problem is, I have so many things to do and so little 
time.

Pekr, I'll write you privately, so you can see the NicomDB in action 
in a real application.

ok, thanks ...

Example



PRINT  (global)

In the most recent Rebol/Core 2.6 (date)
First appeared in Rebol/Core 0.005 alpha (date)
[History]



Passed all 12 unit tests on [30 versions of rebol]. (See [unit tests])


---------------------------

PARSE  (global)

In the most recent Rebol/Core 2.6 (date)
First appeared ...
[History]



Passed all 34 unit tests on [14 versions of rebol]. (See [unit tests])

Ok, created a new Qtask Rebol SIG task, with many notes extracted 
from this discussion in its description. Sitll pretty messy, but 
it's a start.
http://www.qtask.com/details.cgi?project=198&id=38061

Having done that, I can't spend much time on it now ! :-(  But it's 
good to get some of these ideas written down, and a few things worked 
out.

It's been a while, since I last used Qtask. Do I need special permission 
to see that project?

I think you just need to login before you visit that url. Did you 
have trouble accessing it ?

(Or maybe a Lead such as Reichart needs to approve the task first 
? That might take some time...)

Yes, I don't have permission.

Reeeeiiiichart! It's Anton and John caaaalling! ;)

u don't?

I think you are on REBOL SIG.

Look at the regression tests implemented in Orca they already cover 
a lot of behaviour.

http://trac.geekisp.com/orca

They can serve as a base to implement the full unit test for Rebol, 
and save time.

If you download the src code the paths is user-path/orca/trunk/orca/tests/

Isn't there a regression test "suite" for Rebol programs? IIRC someone 
made something like this.

Or was it unit-testing...

I believe there is a Unit Test framework. But no rebol specific regression 
tests have been written. At least not publicly.

Geomol, are you able to login to Qtask still ?

Reichart has approved/released the task, so all I need to do is add 
interested people as watchers.

I see "John" in qtask and added him as a watcher. (I assume that's 
you Geomol). I can add anybody else in qtask who is interested as 
watchers too.

(Geomol, you will need to accept becoming a watcher first, then you 
should be able to see the page.)

Carl used to wax lyrically about the automated Rebol test suite that 
Jeff (Kreis) wrote when he was at RT. As far as I know it was never 
publicly available.

Anton, I have access to the project on Qtask now.

and yes, I'm John in Qtask.

Ah, very good.

>> foreach f read %synapse-chat/ [ ?? f either dir? f [ print [ "directory: 
" f ]][print ["file: " f] ]]
f: %April/
file:  April/
f: %Compkarori/
file:  Compkarori/

this has me somewhat confused.

Does still?

read returns pathless filenames.

but you can see that the trailing slash is preserved ...

it checks by os-call, not filename.

missing things count as as non-dirs too.

foreach f read %./ [ print [ "directory? " dir? f ]]

So, why does this work?

because it's in the current directory ?

yes. "dir? %synapse-chat/April/" would work too.

foreach f read dir: %synapse-chat/ [ ?? f either dir? dir/:f [ print 
[ "directory: " f ]][print ["file: " f] ]]

I guess the lesson is that you need to remember where you are when 
doing these things.

It's faster to check for final slash than to use DIR?, which, as 
Volker pointed out, makes an OS call.

Yeah, I moved to doing that.