r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Core] Discuss core issues

Volker
17-Jun-2006
[4892]
and have that run without problems.
BrianH
17-Jun-2006
[4893]
It was supposed to be that global settings were contained in rebol.r 
and user-specific or local settings in user.r, but it never worked 
that way with Core because REBOL only looked for the location of 
those files once for both, rather than once for each, so you couldn't 
put user.r in a user-specific place and keep rebol.r is a global 
place. VIew does it right with version 1.3 though.
Graham
18-Jun-2006
[4894x4]
set-net [ "[carl-:-rebol-:-com]" smtp.rebol.com ]
should return an error ... but it doesn't.
as this happens
** User Error: ESMTP: Invalid command
** Near: insert smtp-port reduce [from reduce [addr] message]
Robert
18-Jun-2006
[4898x2]
Anton, why do the actual numbers for FOR matter? The thing is, those 
numbers are of type decimal! as my app has to use decimal! values 
for calculation.
Has someone a nice function to extract tuples by level? For example:
	1.0.0
	1.1.0
	1.2.0
	2.0.0
	2.1.0


I just need all 1st level tuples, than only the second level tuples 
etc.
Volker
18-Jun-2006
[4900]
tup: 1.2.3
i: 2
probe tup/:i
; ?
Robert
18-Jun-2006
[4901x3]
I need the function to return only 1.0.0, 2.0.0 or 1.1.0, 1.2.0, 
2.1.0
All tuples that have a specific level set.
I'm just playing around with a multiplier pattern like zero? (1.0.0 
* 0.1.1). This works expect for the 3rd level.
Anton
18-Jun-2006
[4904x7]
Robert, I was just wondering what actually triggered your initial 
question.
I thought perhaps we could refactor your original code to use WHILE 
or REPEAT etc..
I'm not arguing with your main point, which seems to be that the 
current behaviour of FOR is uncomfortable in this respect. (Or is 
it deficient ?)
Robert, how about this ?
tuples-of-level: func [level tuples /local compare][
	result: copy tuples
	remove-each tuple result [
		repeat n length? tuple [
			compare: get pick [<> =] n > level
			if compare 0 tuple/:n [break/return yes]
		]
	]
]

; test
blk: [1.0.0 1.1.0 1.2.0 2.0.0 2.1.0]

tuples-of-level 1 blk  ;== [1.0.0 2.0.0]
tuples-of-level 2 blk  ;== [1.1.0 1.2.0 2.1.0]
tuples-of-level 3 blk  ;== []
tuples-of-level 0 blk  ;== []
This version should scale better.
tuples-of-level: func [level tuples /local compare][
	result: copy []
	foreach tuple tuples [
		if repeat n length? tuple [
			compare: get pick [<> =] n > level
			if compare 0 tuple/:n [break/return no]
			yes
		][append result tuple]
	]
	result
]
Robert
18-Jun-2006
[4911]
Cool... I had this idea with the comparators too but not to use pick 
and the level as the selector. Cool stuff!
Anton
18-Jun-2006
[4912]
:)
Rebolek
22-Jun-2006
[4913]
Has anybody noticed problems with files that have "%" in name?
Anton
22-Jun-2006
[4914x3]
Yes, can't open them in WinXP.
No, yes you can.
read %"Hi%there.txt"     <-- this filename works
Rebolek
22-Jun-2006
[4917]
yes, but load mold %"Hi%there.txt" does not
Anton
22-Jun-2006
[4918]
>> load mold "Hi%there.txt"
== "Hi%there.txt"

what version of rebol, what os ?
Rebolek
22-Jun-2006
[4919]
1.3.2 on WXP
Anton
22-Jun-2006
[4920]
no, sorry, you're right. I missed the initial %
Rebolek
22-Jun-2006
[4921]
I think % should be automatically translated to %25 (like space is 
translated to  ) to prevent these problems
Anton
22-Jun-2006
[4922]
It does not mold into a loadable string. --> RAMBO.
Rebolek
22-Jun-2006
[4923]
OK, I'll post it
Anton
22-Jun-2006
[4924]
Note also this bug!  http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/rambo.r?id=3189&
Rebolek
22-Jun-2006
[4925x2]
well, that's really strange. see this >>
>> load mold to file! "[s-:-a]"
** Syntax Error: Invalid email -- %[s-:-a]
** Near: (line 1) %[s-:-a]
>> load mold to file! "[aas-:-df]"
== ª[s-:-df]
everything in range from "aa@.." to "ff@.." produces the second result
Anton
22-Jun-2006
[4927]
Add this information with the link to #3189 to your report. They 
should insert it into the original bug report.
Ladislav
23-Jun-2006
[4928]
these ways can be used to circumvent the filename character problems 
if needed:
load {%"aaa%aa"}
load "%aaa%25aa"
Pekr
25-Jun-2006
[4929x3]
how to catch following error? error? try [to-date 29-Feb_2006]
ok, putting date in a string helps ...trying to catch leap year ...
I don't like it - why rebol parser interrupts me so fast?
Gabriele
25-Jun-2006
[4932x2]
petr, in the above case (without the quotes), the error happens before 
rebol gets to evaluate the TRY.
you need to put the LOAD or DO that are loading that code in a try 
block.
Pekr
26-Jun-2006
[4934x3]
it does not seem to work:

error? try [load 29-Feb-2006]
I would prefer 29-Feb-2006 error, as well as e.g. error? try [load 
380.250.250] being a bit more relaxed in interpreter ...
how can I catch such syntax errors?
Graham
26-Jun-2006
[4937]
what is your problem?
Ladislav
26-Jun-2006
[4938]
error? try [load "29-Feb-2006"] ; == true
Pekr
26-Jun-2006
[4939x3]
the problems is uncatchable error
I am not talking about string ....
I am not sure I can meet with such situation in real-life :-) I just 
got asked by Bobik. The thing was, that in sqlite date field there 
can be invalid date. Now I am not sure how is the conversion done, 
if via string, but if you simply type such invalid date in console, 
it can't be recovered, and that is my objection in general ...