World: r3wp

Ok, I'll try that and get back with the results.

That fixed it. Thank you so much, Graham!

how does one avoid that variables listed in a block in an object 
become global in this instance:

>> unset [a b c]
>> y: make object! [a: [b c d] set a [1 2 3]]
>> a
** Script Error: a has no value
** Near: a
>> b
== 1
>> c
== 2
>> d
== 3

These give the same result:

>> y: make object! [a: [b c d] set bind a self [1 2 3]]
>> y: make object! [a: [b c d] set bind/copy a self [1 2 3]]
>> y: make object! [a: copy [b c d] set a [1 2 3]]
>> y: make object! [a: bind [b c d] self set a [1 2 3]]

hm... seem to be the old "how to add new variables to an existing 
object" problem. looks like I'll have to find a different approach...

do you know this one?

d: [a b c]
d: use d reduce [d]
set d [1 2 3]

I guess I do now :-)

suggested reading : http://www.fm.tul.cz/~ladislav/rebol/contexts.html
;-)

Anyone have some information on writing to usb ports ?

;To make the following work with a USB printer, do the following:

; 1. share the printer, noting the name given to the shared printer.

; 2. from the command line type: net use lpt1 \\laturk-ws-2\EPSONSty 
/persistent:yes

; 3. put said command line in autoexec.nt so you don't have to type 
it each time.

printer: func [
    "Sends text to printer on //prn."
    [catch]
    Text [string!]    "The text to be printed."
    /Page    "Append Carriage Return (CR) and Page Feed."
    ][
    throw-on-error [
        secure [
            %//prn [allow write]
        ]
        write %//prn Text
        if Page [write/binary %//prn "^(0D)^(page)"]
        Text
   ]
]

Graham, I don't know if that is what you had in mind or not.   I 
think I got the printer function from Andrew Martin.

and the instructions above it are from me :)

I was hoping that a direct way of writing to specified usb port migh 
now be avable.

:>)

You have taught me most of what I know.

If you would have taught me a direct way of writing to a USB port, 
then I would have been able to help you.  LOL.

Ok, next time I have to try harder.

Louis, that is a cool example

...or should I say Graham.

If I have a table of say 4 x 3 and another table of say 3 x 10 .. 
is there a way to merge them so I end up with a table of 7 x 10 where 
the missing cells are either empty or none?

By table, do you mean a block of blocks (a 2-dimensional array) ?
Given
	table-A: [[1 2 3 4][5 6 7 8]]
	table-B: [[a b c][d e f][g h i]]
then
	MERGE-TABLES table-A table-B
== [
        [1 2 3 4 a b c]
        [5 6 7 8 d e f]
        [none none none none g h i]
    ]
Is that the desired output ?

An approach I might use: pre-scan tables for row lengths, use ARRAY 
with the total row-length to create result-table , then poke the 
values of each table into the result-table.

Or something like:
	result-table: copy/deep table-A
	; <- scan for longest row

 ; <-- now extend result-table with values from table-B, creating/initializing 
 any missing/short rows first

Yes, like a sql join.

I was trying to print a table from two different sources, and trying 
to wrap the data inside the cells at the same time.  But I got it 
worked out now.  But was thinking that some type of sql join on tables 
would be good.

Yes, I just realised your question was two days before. :)

Is there some easy conversion of numbers to binary? And I mean numbers 
bigger than 255...

someone did binary tools,no? Wasn't it Geomol?

maybe. but I can't find anything on rebol.org

search altme, it was here ...

Binary tools group

thanks, I've found this http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/view-script.r?color=yes&script=base-convert.r
from Sunanda, I'll try it.

this is a way how to convert something to binary too: http://www.compkarori.com/vanilla/display/peek_and_poke.r

will there be extended support for such binary conversions in R3?

in current Core, I find it difficult to work with what is available 
in terms of rebol .... I mean - for quick console hack sessions ....

but I am also not good in such topic, so it is maybe me, although 
I think that more ppl reqeusted such functionality in kernel ...

I'm 100% sure, there'll be such support in R3...in the long term... 
;)

:-)

maybe with plug-in mechanism, you can write external component to 
handle it, so good old poor pekr can include it and use it :-)

hehe :)

the pwerpack idea was a good one: one central point for crucial mezzanines 
and their documentation, perhaps as easily included as 
  do %powerpack.r 
  powerpack/install 'all
in user.r

c:\> cd rebol
c:\>rebol\
c:\>rebol\dir
rebol.exe
powerpack.r
c:\>rebol\rebol.exe %powerpack.r
c:\>rebol\dir
rebol.exe
powerpack.r
rebol3.0.exe

it works :-)

is there a complete list of all the error codes anywhere? I think 
the error appendix in the Core manual is not adequately describing 
them.

not sure, never saw something like that ...

it would make it a lot easier to create error handling, if you are 
running some code and might expect a large number of different errors 
that need to be translated into a different language

Have you probed system/error ?

yes, but I think it's hardly a useful way to do this. once again 
you have to dig around in the system object to figure something out.

You might be able to put the translated strings directly into the 
error objects before the errors are thrown.

I could if I didn't need to process the error contents. For example, 
I try to connect to an FTP server using an URL with user/pass in 
it. This is normally hidden from view, but if the URL fails, the 
entire user:[pass-:-url] is passed to the error object in clear text.

but I see your point