World: r3wp
[Core] Discuss core issues
older newer | first last |
Gabriele 11-Jun-2007 [8282x4] | you add text #l "Some string" |
and the preprocessor can create a nice .catalog file for you | |
then, you can use a gui tool to edit .catalog files. | |
http://www.colellachiara.com/soft/libs/locale.r | |
btiffin 11-Jun-2007 [8286] | Cool. Thanks Gabriele. I'll be relying on Ashley's RebGUI code for some of the localization, but this looks like something to dig into. |
Ashley 11-Jun-2007 [8287] | A key consideration is whether you want the translation(s) to be static (compile-time) or dynamic (run-time). Advantages and disadvantages to both approaches. |
btiffin 11-Jun-2007 [8288] | Yeah, I toggle back and forth, but they'll be static this time. :) |
Rebolek 11-Jun-2007 [8289] | some BIND expert, please, help me: >> act: [add a b] == [add a b] >> for a 1 5 1 [for b 1 5 1 [do act]] ** Script Error: a has no value ** Where: do-body ** Near: add a b There must be something easier than >> for a 1 5 1 [for b 1 5 1 [do bind bind act 'a 'b]] |
Sunanda 11-Jun-2007 [8290] | Is this simpler and the same effect? act: func [a b][add a b] for a 1 5 1 [for b 1 5 1 [act a b]] |
Rebolek 11-Jun-2007 [8291] | hm, not exactly what I want because this is simplified, I have more variables than just 'a and 'b, but still useful. |
btiffin 11-Jun-2007 [8292] | May or may not work for your needs for a 1 5 1 [for b 1 5 1 bind act 'a] |
Graham 11-Jun-2007 [8293] | Is there an async https protocol in the offing? |
Gabriele 11-Jun-2007 [8294] | mine works with both http and https |
Graham 11-Jun-2007 [8295x2] | is this the current release? |
or you own unreleased version? | |
Gabriele 11-Jun-2007 [8297] | same version as used on the detective and published on my site |
Graham 11-Jun-2007 [8298] | Ok. |
Oldes 12-Jun-2007 [8299x3] | what would be the best way how to legalize urls like this one http://maps.google.com/mapfiles//cb/blue_outlines.png |
I mean rebol-file from such a url | |
hm.. parse t: "a//bb/c" [any [to "/" p1: some "/" p2: (p1: change/part p1 "/" p2) :p1] to end] t | |
Anton 13-Jun-2007 [8302x2] | You mean, to "clean" it, into a legal url ? |
http://anton.wildit.net.au/rebol/freezer/simple-clean-path.r | |
Oldes 13-Jun-2007 [8304x2] | yes... that's what I wanted.. especially to make the local file secure as well... (so converting url to local file does not leave the send-box:) |
I already had own version, but your is a little bit better as correctly handles complete url... my was only for the path | |
Chris 13-Jun-2007 [8306] | This is one reason I wrote my files:// protocol -- http://www.ross-gill.com/r/sandbox.html (need to add to the library). |
Anton 14-Jun-2007 [8307x2] | we also had a secure-clean-path.... |
Ah.. secure-clean-path should be in rebol.org already. | |
Henrik 16-Jun-2007 [8309x4] | do func [a b /c] [either c [a + b][a * b]] 2 3 How do I invoke the refinement? |
or perhaps: f. func [a b /c] [either c [a + b][a * b]] 2 3 do :f 2 3 ; <--- here? | |
Think I figured it out... | |
nope, didn't work. I need the function in a composed block: compose [do (:f/c) 2 3] ; causes error, since arguments are not inside the compose parantheses. But the arguments are not used, so: compose [do (:f/c 2 3)] But now the arguments are local to the function. The arguments come from a different context, so I can't just compose the get-word'ed function with the arguments. So I'll go back to the first question on how to make a refinement on an inline function? | |
Graham 16-Jun-2007 [8313] | why use the refinement in a throwaway function? |
Henrik 16-Jun-2007 [8314x3] | the function is rather complex and must be used many times, so I wrote it outside the block. |
the block is a database query on a remote machine | |
and the function helps me to find out whether certain conditions for a database entry is true or false | |
Graham 16-Jun-2007 [8317] | Didn't Maarten use refinements in rugby? |
Gabriele 16-Jun-2007 [8318x3] | hmm, since you're composing, why not put a path there? |
otherwise... do 'f/c 2 3 should work. | |
>> f: func [a b /c] [either c [a + b][a * b]] >> do 'f/c 2 3 == 5 >> do 'f 2 3 == 6 | |
Henrik 16-Jun-2007 [8321] | gabriele, what if the function is local, but must be used remotely (security is unimportant right now) |
Anton 16-Jun-2007 [8322] | That is a good question, Henrik. |
Volker 16-Jun-2007 [8323x3] | what is wrong with an extra assignment? f: func [a b /c] [either c [a + b][a * b]]] f/c 1 2 |
do (f: func [a b /c] [either c [a + b][a * b]] 'f/c) 2 3 | |
or a wrapper, an 'f-without-c and 'f-with-c. | |
Henrik 16-Jun-2007 [8326] | volker, can't check right now if that works, but does it pack the entire function inside the block? |
Volker 16-Jun-2007 [8327x4] | inside the parens |
and then returns a path with a refinement. 'do gets the path, done. | |
You can put a 'use around it to avoid the temp | |
But not really sure what you want to do. somehow sending a function i guess. | |
Gabriele 18-Jun-2007 [8331] | well... if it's to be automatically called etc., i'd suggest avoiding refinements as much as possible. just use a logic arg. |
older newer | first last |