World: r3wp
[Script Library] REBOL.org: Script library and Mailing list archive
older newer | first last |
DideC 24-Aug-2006 [330x2] | There is a bug in Repack script. Each time I use it and I try to set the target directory, then clicking OK in the selection window terminate the script !! ANNOYING !!! |
Note : I launch Repack by typing this in the console (by example, while trying to get QML-ED) : do http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/download-a-script.r?script-name=qm l-ed.r | |
Sunanda 24-Aug-2006 [332] | Thanks for the error report. It works for me.....At least on the versions of REBOL I am running. What rebol.exe or view.exe are you running? --- As a stop-gap, you could try running repack-core. it's an ugly console-only version of repeck, but it should be less version-sensitive: do http://www.rebol.org/library/public/repack-core.r |
Volker 24-Aug-2006 [333] | starts, but a %template.html is missing. |
Sunanda 24-Aug-2006 [334] | Volker: can you show me the full console log of what you did, thanks? |
Volker 24-Aug-2006 [335] | have run repack-core.r, then call "explorer .", double-click %qml-ed.r, "save html", saved with requester, an alert "Error saving file: Cannot open /C/Dokumente und Einstellungen/BN/Anwendungsdaten/rebol/public/www.rebol.org/library/public/template.html" |
Sunanda 24-Aug-2006 [336] | Thanks. That looks like a different problem to DideC's. Your problem seems to be a traditional REBOL annoyance with paths that contain spaces.... qml-ed.r is tripping up over those spaces in "Dokumente und Einstellungen " --- Could you try it in a folder whose path and name do not contain spaces to test that assumption? Thanks! |
Volker 24-Aug-2006 [337x4] | looks more like a missing file to me. |
but i try. | |
Tried download again, there is a bug: || Downloading: qml-ed.r/RS-NE+.gif || REQUEST FAILED... || REBOL.ORG says file not in package | |
seems the "+" is a problem? (Overlokked that message the first time) | |
Sunanda 24-Aug-2006 [341x2] | You replied as I was typing.... I think you may be right....... Looks like the downloader has failed to find the files that contain a + in the file names. |
Must be -- + in the HTTP spec is escaped to a space at times. So i suspecet we're creating or receiving badly escaped URLs in this case. | |
Volker 24-Aug-2006 [343x2] | that could be it. |
but a "+" in a filename looks weird anyway :) | |
Sunanda 24-Aug-2006 [345] | That's true -- and it may recreate some cross-platform issues on platforms that don't allow + in a file name. But we should be able to deal with it. Thanks for the help in isolating the problem. |
Volker 24-Aug-2006 [346] | A bigger errormessage would be good, and some hint on upload. |
Sunanda 24-Aug-2006 [347x2] | The upload obviously worked -- "+" is not an illegal file name character on either Edgars machine or REBOL.org's current host The notes on contributing a packgae do have detailed guidelines on file naming to avoind problems -- see 2.1 here: http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/boiler.r?display=cons-upload-package-files-help.html But, of course, the author probably wrote the application before they had any idea it might be rolled out as a package for use on a wide range of platforms. *** The bottom line is that + ought to work in a file name for the downloader, so I'll get it fixed. |
Volker's problem fixed: both repack and repack-core not correctly handle files with "+" in their names. DideC's problem remains: could you check the version of REBOL you are using and let me know? Thanks, | |
DideC 25-Aug-2006 [349] | View 1.3.2.3.1 on WinXP. %user.r only contains set-net line. %rebol.r contains nothing but the header. I have tried it too from the WWR ( rebol.com / Public / library / scripts / type / package / calendar-install.r cause qml-ed is not there for the moment). Just click the [ ... ] button to choose a different folder, then clicked [ OK ] and it quits !! |
Pekr 25-Aug-2006 [350] | hehe, Pierre Johnson (whom we excluded from ml), replies in Class R3 blog :-) |
Gabriele 25-Aug-2006 [351x3] | the image and css files where not done by me, and although i had some suspects while uploading them to rebol.org i didn't want to change everything just for that :) i can add a zip file to the package if you need me to. |
the images can also be downloaded from qtask.com/images/qwiki/ | |
note that the script still works without them. you'll just miss them when viewing the html result in the browser if you used anything that needs them (rounded boxes for e.g.) | |
Sunanda 25-Aug-2006 [354] | DideC -- thanks......I see the problem with 1.3.2 too. Let me get back to you. *** qml-ed not there -- No reason it should have vanished. That's strange. Meanwhile, repack-core.r should do the job of downloading it for for. |
DideC 25-Aug-2006 [355] | Don't bother, I have loaded qml-ed already, wihtout changing the dir, and moving files manually after. (I had the same error than volker, but solved it by unchecking the images files in repack and downloaded only "template.html") qml-ed not there -- How often is the Rebol index files rebuilded ? |
Sunanda 25-Aug-2006 [356] | Gald you got it downloaded in the end. The indexes are close to real time. It is possible for the owner of a package like qmr-ed to make it unavailable while they are updating it. maybe that happened this time. |
Gabriele 25-Aug-2006 [357x2] | i didn't change the availability of the package. |
btw, if you have suggestions, please let me know. i'll be working a bit more on it on monday. | |
Maxim 14-Sep-2006 [359x5] | I am in the process of updating repack. |
so far glayout (much better version) is able to open the same core without issues. am doing download tests to be sure the code itself still works... hoping nothing changed within the lds service library... | |
sunanda I am getting an error from the server itself! whenever I press download, it starts the download (shows the green xfer data on the bottom, and then pops up an error: here is the error as reported by LDS: make object! [ status: [100 20 "bad cgi data"] data: none diagnostics: [9003 9003 9.8084E-2] supply-date: 15-Sep-2006/1:03:41 ] have any idea where that is comming from? I try to check it out from the code I have... but its been sooo long, A nudge on your part will help me get this working much faster IMHO! | |
well, I did all I can, for some reason, the same code under 1.2.10 and 1.3.2 does not seem to request the same data on the server (I guess). | |
I am investigating further... | |
Maxim 15-Sep-2006 [364] | pow! all fixed :-) just need to let slim build the new release from all the included files and we are set ! I will also be doing just a little bit of cleanup within GLayout to reduce the size of the final single-file app... |
Sunanda 15-Sep-2006 [365] | Thanks Maxim, I'll try to get the new version up and live in a few days -- I'm pretty busy myself right now. |
Maxim 20-Sep-2006 [366x4] | everyone, its all working now... sorry if we forgot to notify the list... |
new version uses slick new version of GLayout which has gfx partly based on Henrik tests which he supplied a few weeks ago... | |
as usuall, type the following in a rebol console to open up the tool. do http://www.rebol.org/library/public/repack.r also note that I put a lot of effort in optimizing the file's final size, including a lot of hacking out, removing comments, compressing, etc... its now a much smaller download. | |
We are glad to announce that a newer version of the rebol.org package downloader is now available for people using REBOL|view 1.3.2 as usuall, type the following in a rebol console to open up the tool. it now adapts to version automatically <pre>do http://www.rebol.org/library/public/repack.r</pre> also note that I put a lot of effort in optimizing the file's final size, including a lot of hacking out, removing comments, compressing, etc... its now a much smaller download. This version uses a slick new version of GLayout which has gfx largely based on Henrik's tests which he supplied a few weeks ago... | |
Gregg 21-Sep-2006 [370] | Thanks for doing that Maxim! |
Maxim 21-Sep-2006 [371] | my pleasure... only strange that my last post ended up here... it was a copy/paste of info in this group meant for another group.. hum... |
Graham 21-Sep-2006 [372] | Glayout is LGPL. What does that mean for any script using Glayout?? |
Maxim 21-Sep-2006 [373x2] | that you can use it without your tool being confined to GPL. any changes to bring to GLayout must be made available on demand. |
unless you include GLayout *within* your script, in which case, your app is now GPL. but I'll be happy to give people non LGPL versions if they really need it (if they ask nicely ;-) | |
Graham 21-Sep-2006 [375] | So, if you are happy to give people non LGPL .. why not release as BSD or something else? |
Maxim 21-Sep-2006 [376x3] | cause I'm a control freak ;-) |
I have been thinking about it. | |
(aren't we in the wrong group? ;-) | |
Graham 21-Sep-2006 [379] | Basically my experience is that anything that has the word GPL in it does not get used. |
older newer | first last |