World: r3wp
[Script Library] REBOL.org: Script library and Mailing list archive
older newer | first last |
Sunanda 11-Feb-2005 [57] | Thank guys Ammon -- control panel --- can you do a mockup to show what you are thinking? Banner text -- this is a good place for that dicsussion.....REBOL.org could publish the winners and use one/some of them to replace the existing banner tex. |
Geomol 4-Apr-2005 [58] | I've just oploaded my first 2 scripts to the library. rebxml2xml.r and xml2rebxml.r I hope, I've done it correctly. |
Sunanda 4-Apr-2005 [59] | Looks good to me, thanks. Though one oddity -- unlikely not your problem....They don't display in colour: http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/view-script.r?color=yes&script=xml2rebxml.r ....Must be crashing Carl's color-code.r that we use to do the coloring, so we fall back to b&w. I'll take a closer look in a day ot two. |
Graham 11-Jun-2005 [60x2] | How about we have a no-cache directive to stop ISPs caching the scripts for the download page - so we are sure to get the latest one? |
- the other way to do it, is to stick in a dummy cgi-bin in the path .. which also tells the cache not to cache it | |
Sunanda 12-Jun-2005 [62] | Problem is that the download page *is* a static URL if you go to it directly, eg, http://www.rebol.org/library/scripts-download/menu-system.r But of you click the "download script" link while viewing a script, you do go via a dynamic URL -- it creates the static one for you and then redirects, eg http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/download-a-script.r?script-name=menu-system.r {What we should do is update the static file whenever a script is added or updated. That would fix most instances of this....I'll put that on the list, thanks] |
Graham 17-Jun-2005 [63] | Now that 1.3 is out, perhaps all of us who have scripts in the library should take the time to check them for compatibility, and update them if required. |
Gregg 19-Jun-2005 [64] | Yes! Please do! |
DideC 19-Jun-2005 [65] | I would wait for some other platforms release. Just Win actually :-\ |
Allen 24-Jun-2005 [66x2] | I'm chasing some old scripts from Frank Sievertsen, does anyone have the following [lego.r math-do.r irc-protocol.r reblog.r] all described here http://www.codeconscious.com/rebol/dialects.html |
Also chasing svm.r Simple Virtual Machine which was related to the KOSH project | |
Brett 24-Jun-2005 [68] | Allen: sent you email with Frank's scripts attached. |
Allen 24-Jun-2005 [69] | Brett: Thank you! |
Graham 25-Jun-2005 [70] | What else do you have Brett of Frank's ? |
Brett 25-Jun-2005 [71] | Some odds and ends all of which can be found here: http://web.archive.org/web/*sr_1nr_10/http://proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/* |
Anton 25-Jun-2005 [72] | Doesn't look like I have svm.r, sorry. |
Brett 25-Jun-2005 [73] | Oh and I have some fx5 styles stored in a backup of an old REBOL/View cache that is not on wayback machine. |
Anton 25-Jun-2005 [74] | I've got all these in my public cache: proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/fuzzy-k-means.r proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/html-viewer/html-viewer.r proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/REBOL/fx5-menu.r proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/REBOL/fx5-request-file.r proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/REBOL/fx5-styles-test.r proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/REBOL/fx5-styles.r proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/REBOL/irc-client.r proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/REBOL/morph.r proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/REBOL/morph2.r proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/REBOL/multi-click.r proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/REBOL/rebsearch.r proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/REBOL/regedit.r proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/REBOL/rsearch.r proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/REBOL/view-menu-test.r proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/soft/function-test.r proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/soft/fuzzy-pats.r proton.cl-ki.uni-osnabrueck.de/soft/fuzzy-show.r users.bigpond.net.au/datababies/Anton/rebol/links/index.r www-lehre.inf.uos.de/~fsievert/rebol/newshow.r www.sievertsen.de/index.r www.sievertsen.de/REBOL/REBtroids.r www.sievertsen.de/REBOL/REBtris/REBtris.r |
Allen 25-Jun-2005 [75] | OK. Shall we rebuild his reb and host it somewhere again. I'm will to put this all in an fx5 dir on rebolforces. (until Frank surfaces again) |
Anton 25-Jun-2005 [76] | Good idea. I will email you what I have later, |
Allen 25-Jun-2005 [77] | Its alive! Frank-enstein... |
Graham 25-Jun-2005 [78x2] | Anyone see his dbridge.r and dbridge.java ? |
This appears to be the fx5 home page .. but all the links for the plugins are broken. http://www.dchen.de/ | |
Allen 25-Jun-2005 [80] | OK. Just a quick place holder with the scripts I've got so far http://www.rebolforces.com/fx5/ |
yeksoon 26-Jul-2005 [81] | does anyone know of any site indexer or search engine script written in rebol or available in rebol.org? |
Sunanda 26-Jul-2005 [82] | REBOL.org uses an indexer i wrote for another application and adapted to the Library. Let me know what you need an indexer for, and I could comment on its suitability. Hallvard must have an indexer too to run Rix: http://www.oops-as.no/rix |
Sunanda 8-Aug-2005 [83] | Just trimmed about 100 people from the Library membership list.... http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/cpt-view-users.r A lot of them were drive-by signups by spammers to get their URL a link ("Hi I'm Mandy, click my link for photos") And most of *those* must have an IQ hovering aound their waist size because they'd failed to click the profile option to make their URL visible to other Library members. So the membership list (claiming 200+ members) is more relevant than it was before. But the automated expiry script may have caught some genuine members. If your userid has gone and you want it back, please drop me a private message. |
Ingo 13-Aug-2005 [84] | If I have a script that is based on some source code from within rebol (say, on the desktop code), what's the appropriate license, when uploading to rebol.org? |
Graham 13-Aug-2005 [85] | REBOL [ Title: "REBOL/View Desktop - Main Module" Version: 1.2.0 Author: "Carl Sassenrath" Rights: "Copyright REBOL Technologies 1999-2005. All rights reserved." ; You are free to use, modify, and distribute this software with any ; REBOL Technologies products as long as the above header, copyright, ; and this comment remain intact. This software is provided "as is" ; and without warranties of any kind. In no event shall the owners or ; contributors be liable for any damages of any kind, even if advised ; of the possibility of such damage. See license for more information. ; Please help us to improve this software by contributing changes and ; fixes via http://www.rebol.com/feedback.html- Thanks! ] |
Ingo 14-Aug-2005 [86x2] | Well, the library header 'license seems to only accept one of: bsd cc-by cc-by-sa gpl lgpl mit pd public-domain rvd And it is needed, but noneof these seems to be acceptable ... I guess ... |
It seems you got the source code .... from, no, I just remember, it had once been released, right? But I just extracted the code from a running rebol. I guess this header seems to be right. | |
Sunanda 14-Aug-2005 [88] | When we added validation for the license field, we limited it to licenses that had actually been used by people contributing scripts: http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/license-help.r I reckon there are way too many license variants already in the world -- it's the bane of the open source movement. (We had a list of over 40 licenses that people in theory said they'd like to use when contributing scripts) But,. as the note on the page says: f you'd like to use a license for a contributed script, and you can't see it listed above, please send us Feedback. |
Ingo 14-Aug-2005 [89] | OK, Feedback .... but I dunno what license I'd like to use ... what would you call it? |
Graham 14-Aug-2005 [90x3] | LPL ? |
And note that if you extract the code from a running rebol, you won't get the license. I got the above from the new SDK. So, that message needs to be included with your script. | |
Wasn't Carl thinking about a new license at one stage ? | |
Ingo 14-Aug-2005 [93x2] | I seem to remember something like that ... but then ... I do remember lots of things said ... |
Whatever this meens ;-) | |
Graham 14-Aug-2005 [95x3] | Now the desktop source has a different license from the rest of rebol code. |
Hmm. Perhaps not. | |
Looks like the sdk has all changed to the above license. | |
Ingo 14-Aug-2005 [98x2] | means, of course |
I'm not sure, is the license stated anywhere? I mean, for code extracted from the running executable ... | |
Graham 14-Aug-2005 [100x2] | I don't think so ... |
There might be a standard copyright somewhere that says you can't reverse engineer ... | |
Ingo 14-Aug-2005 [102] | I got the code from the 1.3.1 executable, so it does not necessarily use the same license as the one distributed with the older SDK. |
Graham 14-Aug-2005 [103] | But the current SDK license appears to say that it is now possible to publish all the sources on say, rebol.org ... |
Ingo 14-Aug-2005 [104] | I guess it should be ... there are a lot of patches to the code on rebol.org, which maybe we should check the licenses on them. |
Graham 14-Aug-2005 [105] | So, time to ask Sunanda if we should now do that. |
Sunanda 14-Aug-2005 [106] | I don't know (or care) much about licenses -- generally speaking after I've written some code and it's been sold or given away, I never want to see it again.....So I'm not the best person to ask. Carl did offer the "rebol desktop license" which may be what you want. Some info starting here http://www.rebol.com/news3610.html |
older newer | first last |