World: r3wp
[Script Library] REBOL.org: Script library and Mailing list archive
| older newer | first last |
| Chris 11-Mar-2009 [751] | Preventing any new content from posting invalid sequences, for example... |
| Sunanda 12-Mar-2009 [752] | Peter beat me to it, thanks. Sorry Oldes, the Library does not support utf-8, despite my confused suggestion that it did. Because we use a charset of UTF-8 in the browser header, it is _possible_ that we can more-or-less handle scripts with 2+ byte UTF-8 codings in REBOL strings! But that's not been tested. Good point, Chris -- we already have such a filter, but it is not used to turn back conributions. |
| swall 12-Mar-2009 [753] | Sunanda, I have emailed the zipped script to you. |
| PeterWood 12-Mar-2009 [754] | Chris, one issue that we face with the mailing list archive is not knowing how the imput is encoded. I think this is also true of scripts. |
| Sunanda 12-Mar-2009 [755x2] | Thanks, Scott. --The email script looks fine -- it's identical to what is in the Library -- Viewing the scriot works fine -- Downloading it doesn't .....Which is exactly what you reported. We are now both on the same page :-) |
We've had a similar problem before (I've just checked the source code, and it's prompted my memory). To solve it, we analyse the script for various extended ascii chars and then perform some messing around on HTTP content-type headers. It's messy, and it's worked up til now......But obviously, we need some more analysing and messing around for this script. | |
| Sunanda 13-Mar-2009 [757] | Results of a tiny bit of debugging on the ascii chars problem:
-- problem seems to be at the input stage:
-- if you have exended ascii characters (top bit set, like the 1/4
used in the script) what we get from the webserver is bad (extra,
unexpected extended ascii chars)
-- only download is (visibly) affected, although the extra extended
ascii chars are present in the text streams
-- though there is some REBOL mezz code (decode-cgi) that may be
doing something I do not understand
-- I can replicate the problem with both Apache and Xitami which
suggests the problem may be in REBOL rather than a given server.
-- the quick fix would be to add accept-charset="ISO-8859-1" to the
<form ....> or <textarea ....>
-- but that stops all extended ascii, including the ones we want.
So we won't do that.
-- the slower fix has yet to emerge from the available options.
|
| Gabriele 14-Mar-2009 [758] | why not standardize everything on UTF-8? |
| Sunanda 14-Mar-2009 [759] | As far as I know, Core 2.5.6 (what the Library CGIs runs on) does not support UTF-8. |
| Gabriele 14-Mar-2009 [760] | does not support UTF-8 - what do you mean by "support"? if you mean having native encoders/decoders, no, it does not. but, utf-8 is just 8 bit characters, and it is backwards compatible with ascii. if you can handle ascii, and leave alone any char > 127, you already support utf-8. |
| Sunanda 14-Mar-2009 [761] | Sadly, REBOL running as CGI under the two servers I've tested (Apache and Xitami) does not seem to support the whole range of ASCII -- ASCII chars with the 8th bit set seem to cause problems. I don't know where the problem really is, but right now, we do not even support 8-bit ASCII, let alone anything more modern :-) |
| PeterWood 14-Mar-2009 [762] | At the moment, I'd be worried about standarising the Library on utf-8 as the effect of multibyte characters would have during script and mail processing is not understood. It could well be that the system handles multibyte characters without a hitch but nobody knows yet. I have started to write some scripts to try to help move to a consistent character encoding of the Library data but, due to time constraints, I have been very slow. |
| Anton 14-Mar-2009 [763x3] | Why worry? Just do it. :-P |
What version of rebol is being used by rebol.org ? | |
Sunanda, can you publish some files with the 8-bit ascii and note what the problems are ? | |
| Maxim 14-Mar-2009 [766x3] | sunanda, you can force the character encoding in the html page header... I've used that before and it worked for me. |
note, I don't mean the http header, but the actual <HEAD> tag. | |
I had the same kind of issues on another system. nowadays, the default encoding has become UTF-8 for many/most html handlers, so if its not specified, many new browers and tools will incorrectly break up the character data. | |
| Sunanda 14-Mar-2009 [769x2] | Anton, REBOL.org uses 2.5.6.4.1 The obvious bad file is the one Scott added recently: http://www.rebol.org/view-script.r?script=ascii-math.r If you view it with that URL, all looks good. If you click the [Download script] link you'll see many spurious high-ascii chars in the source. Those high ascii _are_ actually in the source. But where they came from is a mystery. |
Maxim, REBOL.org emits a header <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8"> Yeah, I know we aren't utf-8 -- but experiment has shown that's the moste acceptable charset. Not sure what you are saying we could put in <head> -- can you be more specific. | |
| Maxim 14-Mar-2009 [771] | there is a specific charset for western -iso, which ensure the extra 127 bytes are correct. <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> |
| Sunanda 14-Mar-2009 [772] | Thanks......We used to have that, but it created some other problems. I'll have to try to remember what and why :-) And it does not solve the download problem (I know, I tried yesterday). |
| PeterWood 14-Mar-2009 [773] | I think the root of the problem is that when the Library system was first written, no account was taken of character encoding. As a result, not only is the data encoded as it was when originally submitted but the method of encoding is not even known. Whatever charset is specified in the http header is not going to be correct for all scripts and messages. Using charset=utf8 seems to cause the least problems. Though for example, it will cause many ISO-8859-1 "high bit" characters to be incorrectly displayed. |
| Chris 14-Mar-2009 [774x3] | Do you have any stats on how many 'high bit' characters are now contained in Library content? |
Or scope? - minimal; limited; too many to be trivial... | |
Re. ISO-8859-1 - the most obvious problem is the limitation - 256 chars vs. UCS-1+ | |
| Sunanda 14-Mar-2009 [777] | No actual stats. Just from feel: * Scripts -- very few * Posts on the ML -- a few dozen * AltME archive -- no idea |
| Gabriele 15-Mar-2009 [778] | Sunanda, I can tell you where does chars come from. if your page is set as utf-8, then the script as been uploaded by the browser as utf-8. when you view it in the brower, it shows correctly as utf-8. when you download it, it is still utf-8, but if you view it with something that believes it's latin1 (eg. the rebol 2 console on windows set as latin1), it won't show up correctly. |
| Anton 15-Mar-2009 [779x6] | Sunanda, you're right about that ascii-math.r file. When I clicked the [Download script] link, the browser (konqueror) downloaded and directly opened it with the editor (SciTE). SciTE thought it was 8-bit ascii, and showed the characters incorrectly. All I had to do was change the file encoding from 8-bit to utf-8 and the characters appeared correctly. I guess the editor had no way of determining the encoding, and incorrectly guessed 8-bit ascii. |
The view-script.r html source for the page correctly advertises the encoding as utf-8, so the browser shows it correctly. | |
So I'm pretty happy with the way that script was handled by the software here. | |
Except for R2 console, of course. | |
R3 console seems to handle it better. | |
Any other scripts you can find showing problems ? | |
| Sunanda 16-Mar-2009 [785x2] | Thanks Gabriele -- that's a clear explanation, and has helped me work out what is going on. Anton and Gabriele -- I have tried changing the charset we emit on the download to say UTF-8. But that makes little difference. As both of you note, once the file has been saved then (without a MAC-type resource fork) there is no obvious indication of the encoding. And several editors I have tried get it wrong -- thus "revealing" the extra ASCII chars. Not sure what the solution is other than to de-UTF-8 files on download. |
Anton -- not yet run a crawl to check for other scripts with high ascii chars. | |
| Anton 16-Mar-2009 [787x3] | Which editors? I think most editors these days allow manually changing the encoding, so developers who notice strange characters can just change it themselves. Maybe it would be helpful to add a rebol.org library script header advertising the encoding (when it is known, and when not). I don't recommend 'de-UTF-8'ing files on download - that's just going to confuse things more, especially when the file is view-script.r'd as utf-8 just beforehand. |
It seems the responsibility lies with the clients to interpret encodings properly. As we move to a unicode world, software assuming 8-bit encodings are some ASCII encoding should drop off. But until the transition is complete, there's not much we can do about client software guessing wrong like that, except stating the encoding in the script header, in the web page that provides the download link, and by helping confused newbies. | |
Are rebol.org uploaders asked to declare the encoding used? | |
| swall 16-Mar-2009 [790] | If the offending downloaded script is executed in Rebol/Core, the extra ASCII chars are also present in the executed code. The script defines ½ to be 0.5. If "help ½" is typed into the console, the result is "Found these words: ½ decimal! 0.5". However, if the script is executed in Rebol/View, the result is "½ is a decimal of value: 0.5". It seems that View handles it correctly, while Core doesn't. |
| Sunanda 16-Mar-2009 [791] | Thanks guys. Other scripts with the same problem.....there are a couple. About 10% of all scripts have at least one extended ASCII char....But most of them are acceptable in LATIN-1 code page / charset (eg copyright symbol, some accented letters). It's just a very few scripts that use 1/4 and similar symbols that cause the problem. What other editors? Windows NOTEPAD is one example of a common one that gets this wrong. |
| swall 16-Mar-2009 [792] | Vim and Editor² display the chars incorrectly. Notepad++ shows the chars correctly. |
| Sunanda 16-Mar-2009 [793] | Of the various editors / word processors I have immediately to hand: -- credit.exe -- [my usual editor] shows incorrect chars, and has no option to switch to UTF-8 -- open office writer -- works fine if you take the UTF-8 option when asked -- ms word -- claims file is corrupt -- word perfect -- makes a complete mess -- R2/View's built in editor ( editor %/c/path to my local copy//ascii-math.r) -- shows incorrect chars |
| Anton 17-Mar-2009 [794x2] | Vim supports unicode and on my system shows the characters correctly. |
Ok, so there are some editors which don't support unicode, don't guess encoding correctly, or can change encoding only with difficulty. How about this suggestion; if a rebol.org script is known to be UTF-8, then an additional link should appear: [Download as ASCII] download-a-script?script-name=ascii-math.r&encoded-as=8-bit-ascii which transcodes a UTF-8 file to ASCII. Just have to get a conversion function in place for this to work. | |
| Gabriele 17-Mar-2009 [796x2] | Sunanda: given that R2 uses the host current code page, I think the best way would be for the user to convert the script after downloading it. On Linux or Mac for eg, UTF-8 is perfect for Core scripts as the terminal is UTF-8. On Windows or for View scripts, you'll get the host code page displayed anyway, so the user has to do the conversion. A tool to do that automatically would be nice (I have the code, it will be released soon, but you may need to wait a couple weeks more). |
All these troubles go away with R3... but I think it would be nice if R2 recognized UTF-8 and converted it on the fly; we could add a BOM at the beginning to make that easier. | |
| Chris 17-Mar-2009 [798] | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_Order_Mark#cite_note-0 |
| swall 17-Mar-2009 [799x2] | Anton: you're right Vim does display the file correctly, although not by default. I guess it helps when you read the manual. :-) |
Gabriele: Where is the host code page set? On Windows, is it set differently for View and Core? Is that why the downloaded script works as expected in View but not in Core? | |
| older newer | first last |