r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Script Library] REBOL.org: Script library and Mailing list archive

Maxim
10-Jul-2009
[861]
here is an error I got trying to go to the http-tools.r script...

Not Found


The requested URL /cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/view-script.r was not found 
on this server.


Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying 
to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Apache Server at www.rebol.org Port 80
Sunanda
10-Jul-2009
[862]
Thanks -- I see that too......We need a tweak on the URL rewriting.
Maxim
10-Jul-2009
[863]
glad to help. :-)
Sunanda
10-Jul-2009
[864]
Thanks -- looks like our  .htaccess is being ignored by the new version 
of Apache.

I suppose I could mess around trying stuff in .htconfig to work around 
it.

Instead, I've asked the ISP why .htaccess is not enabled. I'll ley 
you know when they respond.
Graham
10-Jul-2009
[865]
I get an internal server error at www.rebol.org
Sunanda
10-Jul-2009
[866x2]
Thanks, So did I -- I uploaded one changed cgi script as part of 
the sea trials for the new site. And suddenly it all went dark.
Back now.....Not sure what happened, yet.
Got it -- what I'd uploaded (using our time-tested uploader) somehow 
had the wrong sort of line endings, and Apache got very unhappy.

My immediate attempted repair (hand upload via FTP) also had the 
same issue.
I have no idea why the line endings are suddenly acceptable.


The ISP saved the day by restoring the cgi-bin from the previous 
night's backup.
Gabriele
11-Jul-2009
[868]
Sunanda, what usually creates problems is the shebang line ending. 
If it's CRLF, the CR becomes part of the command line.
Sunanda
11-Jul-2009
[869]
Thanks Gabriele. That's probably what happened.

The real mystery though is why our upload process gets it wrong with 
the new server.
Sunanda
12-Jul-2009
[870]
Maxim -- 404s should be fixed now. Sorry again for the problem.

Gabriele -- the ISP explains it as some stray redirect for the duplicate 
folders we had during the migration. I am not sure I follow their 
explanation, but they say they've fixed it.
Graham
22-Jul-2009
[871x3]
Is there a way to provide page numbers into the altme messages?  
It's only got newer and older to allow pagination.
Perhaps index by month??
Also, can we have a smarter parser for obfuscating email addresses: 

bugs	mysql://[root-:-localhost]/bugs1
Sunanda
22-Jul-2009
[874x2]
Thanks Graham.

Paging for AltME archive.....We only put the basics in place. It 
is certainly improvable.

Meanwhile, you can make great leaps if you are happy to edit the 
end of the URL ....

... eg 16273 is the post number for group 453 of world R3WP. Change 
the 16273 to move quickly:
http://www.rebol.org/aga-display-posts.r?post=r3wp453x16273
The email obsfucation is based on Andrew's  code. Improvements are 
welcome!
http://www.rebol.org/view-script.r?script=uri.r


Meanwhile, we do not obsfucate if you are logged on. So log on for 
a better browsing experience.
Graham
22-Jul-2009
[876x3]
Looking at that script, I suspect you can change the definition for 
user so that it excludes //
or not ..
well, I guess the obfuscation is fair enough since it's a user/password 
combination
Barik
6-Aug-2009
[879x2]
Hi all. I've got an issue in REBOL2. I have a Win32 DLL (using library/load) 
that has an argument of char**. What does my make routine! need to 
look like to be able to handle this?
Hmm, I just realized library group was for the script library, not 
for library/load and DLL related questions. Oops.
Sunanda
6-Aug-2009
[881]
No problem.....The flaw is really in AltME: we should be able to 
move posts around to the right group.
Barik
6-Aug-2009
[882x2]
What's the appropriate group to ask my question do you think
Core?
Sunanda
6-Aug-2009
[884]
BrianH suggests DLL.SO
Barik
6-Aug-2009
[885]
Okay, I'll give it a shot there, thanks.
Geomol
21-Aug-2009
[886]
Is it possible to search the library for something like: "func [:"
I only need results, where the string "func [:" is included.
Sunanda
21-Aug-2009
[887]
Sorry, no there is not -- not online anyway.

You could download all the scripts and do a search locally with a 
few lines of REBOL code 
http://localhost/cgi-bin/download-librarian.r
(the scripts will all be in the /scripts/ folder)
Geomol
21-Aug-2009
[888x3]
Thanks!
It doesn't seem, functions with get-word refinements are used very 
much.
Not refinements, get-word arguments.
Gregg
21-Aug-2009
[891]
They are very rare.
Maxim
26-Aug-2009
[892]
is the site built using only nested table elements?
Sunanda
26-Aug-2009
[893]
Good news -- no absolutely positiioned DIVs, so it is a fairly fluid 
layout, will flow easily into most window size.


Bad news -- main frame of site is a table. Originally, it was nested 
DIVs but that caused some layout problems when displaying <pre> sections 
of code. Going to a table was a quick fix that has never been looked 
at again.
Maxim
26-Aug-2009
[894x2]
divs really cause sooooo much browser display issues.... tables usually 
are easier to manage.
ok , I'll give it a try for fun...  :-)
Graham
26-Aug-2009
[896]
Max, given up already on the json library?? :)
Maxim
26-Aug-2009
[897]
I'm almost done doing my lean rebol to JSON converter...  and its 
been tested using an html and javascript  test, so its output is 
valid.
Graham
26-Aug-2009
[898]
In that case, fnished so soon??
Maxim
26-Aug-2009
[899]
sunanda, you might want to add an "extension" section to rebol.org 
where we may contribute C/C++ code to rebol.org... what do you think?


for tutorials and small projects it might be very usefull as a tool 
to help out other people into understanding how to use the extension 
API.
Sunanda
26-Aug-2009
[900]
It's possible....But may take a while.

For now, you could publish extension code on REBOL.org as an article 
(or series of articles).
Pekr
26-Aug-2009
[901]
Guys, is there any strategy of how to distinguish R2 vs R3 script 
base? I know that there are header/library fields available, but 
apart from that, I expect almost zero compatibility between R2 and 
R3 script base, and users might be confused, why scripts don't work 
for them? Would R2 vs R3 script-base split be a good idea?
Sunanda
26-Aug-2009
[902]
The strategy is:

-- allow scripts to be tagged as (say) r3-ready,. r3-only, r2-only
-- allow searches to be limited to specific tags
-- perhaps highligh in searh results the R2/R3 status.
The first two steps are already in place.
Sunanda
25-Sep-2009
[903]
Something new in the Library....If you own scripts, you can add images 
to them to make it all a bit more graphic.

Only example to date here:
    http://www.rebol.org/view-script.r?script=ascii-chart.r

Notes about how to add images to yoour scripts here:
    http://www.rebol.org/boiler.r?display=script-images

Thanks to Maxim for the original change request.
amacleod
25-Sep-2009
[904]
very nice touch
AdrianS
26-Sep-2009
[905]
looks good - it might be useful to impose the actual dimensions of 
the three sizes for consistency. I suppose the submitted images could 
be scaled after uploading, but it might help the uploader to know 
the sizes so that he could take them into account and maybe crop 
the images, if needed.
Maxim
13-Dec-2009
[906]
rebol.org should have a new tag added:

 R3


since R3 just about every R3 scripts are incompatible with R2 it 
would be nice to have reference to what R3 scripts are available 
on rebol.org.


I ask this cause I want to upload an R3 BNF -> Parse grammer converter 
and I see no way to make it explicit in the gui that its an R3 script.
Reichart
13-Dec-2009
[907]
Agreed.
Sunanda
13-Dec-2009
[908]
Anyone can add any tag to scripts....Click the [edit tags] link when 
logged on and looking at a script.
   http://www.rebol.org/boiler.r?display=st-edit-tags-help
Maxim
13-Dec-2009
[909x2]
ok, so my guess is to add r3 as a library *interface* supported tag 
in the left columns.
there is a tagged called r3-ready, but that doesn't rule out its 
a r3 only script.