World: r3wp
[View] discuss view related issues
older newer | first last |
Maxim 29-Jan-2011 [10530] | for those who don't know how to change the title of a window in R2.... rebol [] win: view/offset/new layout [ button 400x20"change window name" [ win/text: random "ogiue goiueng oesigneso ginue sogine sgioun " win/changes: [text] show win] ] 200x200 do-events |
DideC 31-Jan-2011 [10531] | The following code cause an error if you click on the window (XP SP2) : view layout [box effect [ draw [ pen none navy line-pattern 2 7 2 3 ]]] Does others could confirm the problem ? |
Henrik 31-Jan-2011 [10532] | it just quits here in 2.7.7. |
Oldes 31-Jan-2011 [10533] | It's known bug. At least Maxim was talking about it with Cyphre in OSX group a few days ago. |
Dockimbel 31-Jan-2011 [10534] | Tested with View 2.7.7 & 2.7.8 on Win7/32-bit, it quits too here. |
DideC 31-Jan-2011 [10535] | I always get : Instruction at "0x7c920cce" use the memory address "0x40080000". The memory can't be "read". (rougthly traduce from the French message !) |
Maxim 31-Jan-2011 [10536] | yes, its a BUG in AGG, using more than 2 values in line pattern will cause the crash. its the oldest AGG bug I know of. spoke with cyphre, its possible that this will be fixed in next release of R2, which shoudn't take more than a few weeks IMHO. |
Henrik 14-Feb-2011 [10537x2] | How does one capture whether a window is maximized or not? |
I can see a maximize and a minimize event, but no restore event. And face/changes is cleared, when the event handler reads it. Not very useful. | |
Maxim 14-Feb-2011 [10539] | face changes is used for the internal show to optimise if/what it should redraw. as such its a "write only" property, reading from it makes no real sense. for example if you set changes to [offset] it will move the window MUCH faster than if you change offset & show without it. |
james_nak 10-Jun-2011 [10540] | I have a problem. Basically I need to know how to interupt a function that is looping. So this is what happens: The user presses "start" button which calls the printing routine. I want to be able to allow him to stop the process if he wishes by pressing a "stop" button. The issue is the face is only recording my attempts to stop. Any thoughts? |
Henrik 10-Jun-2011 [10541x2] | I usually set a flag with a button and try to read the flag in the loop. I'm not sure if it's easy to get an immediately responding button, though. |
perhaps if you wait a short period prior to reading the flag in the loop. | |
james_nak 10-Jun-2011 [10543x4] | Yes, I've tried to do that but it doesn't seem to work. |
I'll put a wait and see | |
OK, I'm getting close. | |
Yup, the wait does the trick. Thanks Henrik. | |
Henrik 10-Jun-2011 [10547] | ok, cool |
Maxim 10-Jun-2011 [10548] | yes, the wait allows the event system to act like an async system. just be careful though, you can get lost in concurrency and get apps which close all windows but don't actually close the rebol process, which ends up in an event deadlock. :-) |
james_nak 11-Jun-2011 [10549] | Yes, I actually saw that in my tests as well. For now this one "wait" seems to be doing its job and I just hope it is not system-dependent in terms of the time I have set the wait for. |
Endo 5-Jul-2011 [10550x4] | Can someone confirm this issue: secure allow permits all access, but library access still pops up security window. >> secure allow == [net allow library allow shell allow registry allow envr allow file allow] >> dll: load/library %REb-Excel.dll ** Access Error: REBOL - Security Violation ** Near: dll: load/library %REb-Excel.dll |
The problem still there even I start rebol.exe with -s option. | |
But if I start rebol.exe with --secure option then it doesn't pop up security check window. I tested this on Windows XP/2008. | |
So it looks -s and --secure don't behave same. Which can be a bug in current R2/View. | |
Maxim 5-Jul-2011 [10554x2] | I've never had the problem. (even on w7) |
I always use -qs. | |
Endo 5-Jul-2011 [10556] | secure allow should behave like that, right? |
Maxim 5-Jul-2011 [10557] | AFAIK yes. |
Endo 5-Jul-2011 [10558] | if we don't use --secure allow or -s. |
Maxim 5-Jul-2011 [10559] | so maybe there is a bug within the secure function. did you check on RAMBO? |
Endo 5-Jul-2011 [10560] | yep, I checked rambo, no ticket for this. |
Gabriele 6-Jul-2011 [10561] | I've never seen this either. But all my scripts that use load/library are started with -s... (or encapped) |
Endo 6-Jul-2011 [10562] | that is strange.. I'll test it again in a few days, the PC is on a customer place.. |
Endo 19-Jul-2011 [10563x2] | This example, in REBOL/View Developer's Guide was working before, but now gradmul effect doesn't give the expected result. I tested it on View V2.7.7.3.1 and 2.7.8.3.1 view layout [ backdrop effect [gradient 1x1 180.0.0 0.0.100] vh2 "Layout Definition:" 200x22 yellow effect [gradmul 1x0 50.50.50 128.128.128] vtext bold italic "Layouts describe graphical user interfaces." button "Remember" effect [gradient 0.0.0] ] |
hmm.. if I give a second color for VH2 then it works as expected. Some lastest changes affected this I think. view layout [ backdrop effect [gradient 1x1 180.0.0 0.0.100] vh2 "Layout Definition:" 200x22 yellow red effect [gradmul 1x0 50.50.50 128.128.128] vtext bold italic "Layouts describe graphical user interfaces." button "Remember" effect [gradient 0.0.0] ] | |
Maxim 19-Jul-2011 [10565] | because the face is transparent, and modifying it (not creating new images) you have to merge the background... this change occured a long time ago (draw V2 IIRC). in your second example, it works only because you set the face color, which is then multiplied. first example, fixed: view layout [ backdrop effect [gradient 1x1 180.0.0 0.0.100] vh2 "Layout Definition:" 200x22 yellow effect [ MERGE gradmul 1x0 50.50.50 128.128.128] vtext bold italic "Layouts describe graphical user interfaces." button "Remember" effect [gradient 0.0.0] ] |
Endo 19-Jul-2011 [10566] | Ok, thank you. I understand. Earlier versions of 2.7.x it wasn't like this as I remember. (or am I getting older?:) ) |
Maxim 19-Jul-2011 [10567] | yeah, its been like that a long time, its just an edge case which people don't hit often. you probably where using faces with colors and you didn't realize it. |
Endo 26-Aug-2011 [10568x4] | There is a very annoying bug on View (2.7.8.3.1), can anyone confirm that? Please see the code below: |
fnt: make face/font [ name: "Courier New" size: 14 align: 'left valign: 'top color: white ] f: make face [color: blue / 2 edge: none size: 300x200 text: "" font: fnt] window: layout/size [] 500x400 insert window/pane :f loop 500 [insert f/text " "] append f/text "test" view window | |
It doesn't matter how many space character you put in to face/text, it always shows the text after spaces, on the second line. I tried f/line-line: none etc. If I replace spaces with anything else then it works as expected. But space chars somehow ignored by the face. | |
I can only find a workaround, I use #{A0} (no-break space, alt + 0160) character instead of normal space #{20}. Then it works ok. | |
GrahamC 26-Aug-2011 [10572x2] | no-wrap ? |
as-is ? | |
Gregg 26-Aug-2011 [10574x2] | t: join head insert/dup copy "" " " 500 "test" view layout [text t white blue] t: join head insert/dup copy "" " " 500 "test" view layout [text t white blue 'as-is] |
Just to make Graham's suggestion explicit. | |
Izkata 26-Aug-2011 [10576] | The word doesn't have to be literal: view layout [text t white blue as-is] |
Endo 27-Aug-2011 [10577x2] | No it doesn't change the result. To test it give a width for the text: t: join head insert/dup copy "" " " 500 "test" view layout [text 100x400 t white blue as-is] test is still on the second line. I tried as-is, line-list: none, I need to use wrap?: yes. Otherwise I have to my own wrap function which I don't have time to do. |
Here is the difference: t1: join head insert/dup copy "" #{20} 500 "test" t2: join head insert/dup copy "" #{A0} 500 "test" view layout [text 100x400 t1 white blue as-is return text 100x400 t2 white red as-is] | |
Izkata 27-Aug-2011 [10579] | I would call that a feature, not a bug. The (normal) breaking space allows word wrapping to split between words, rather than in the middle of words... |
older newer | first last |