World: r3wp
[View] discuss view related issues
older newer | first last |
Izkata 29-Jul-2005 [1970x2] | view layout [at 5x5 check 20x20 at 0x0 box 100x100 feel [detect: func [f e][e]]] |
The best I can think of is looping through face/parent-face/pane, checking offsets, and activating the correct one... I'm hoping someone will have a nicer solution, though ^.^ | |
Gregg 29-Jul-2005 [1972] | What's the ultimate goal Izzy? That is, why do you have a face over the face? |
Anton 29-Jul-2005 [1973x3] | You mean make a face "transparent" to events ? You click right through the box, and it hits the checkbox. I did something like that once.... |
It helps to know if the covering face is the same size and offset as the face below. (then you don't have to modify the event/offset) | |
Check out this old script. It's a bit messy, but the example works. http://www.lexicon.net/antonr/rebol/gui/transparent-events.r | |
Izkata 29-Jul-2005 [1976] | See my newly uploaded package - %Entity.r - I'm looking for ways to have some unusual fun with Rebol faces, and right now I'm trying to get it to draw one top of everything, but still let buttons and such work |
Anton 29-Jul-2005 [1977] | Yes, that is something I definitely wanted to be able to do too. So I've been stuffing around on that bit. I have updated the script (still not perfect, but could help you on your way.) See above link. |
Volker 29-Jul-2005 [1978x2] | IIRC Cyphre has in his drag-drop-demo a find-face-underneath which scans the all faces, not only the ones in the parent-pane. |
and to emulate events better, you can also do this: reduce [e/1 e/2 e/3 e/4 e/5 e/6 e/7 e/8 offset e/offset ..] then poth event/1 and event/offset work | |
Anton 29-Jul-2005 [1980] | Yes, find-face-underneath is rudimentary. Needs to be a recursive search. |
Volker 29-Jul-2005 [1981] | (that means " 'offset e/offset " of course |
Anton 29-Jul-2005 [1982] | Volker, I just uploaded 1.0.1, which uses that technique. |
Volker 29-Jul-2005 [1983] | Ah, got confused. you have a 'copy-event without it, thought you used that. |
Anton 29-Jul-2005 [1984x2] | Check http://www.lexicon.net/antonr/rebol/library/window.r for find-face-deep, which recurses. |
Ah you're right. That is just remnant code from 2002. | |
Volker 29-Jul-2005 [1986x2] | reading %window.r . looks interesting. |
from reading source, 'sum-face-offsets maybe needs update: it does not add the /edge for now? | |
Anton 29-Jul-2005 [1988] | Ok, thanks, I added to todo list to check that out. |
Izkata 29-Jul-2005 [1989] | ehh.. 10kb will take a while for me to go through *and* understand - for the moment I'm sticking to transparent-events ^.^ eenyways, lunch and work meeting, then I'll start >.> |
Volker 29-Jul-2005 [1990x3] | i guess the important part in %window.r is 'find-face-deep (at the bottom). |
and from rebol 'win-offset? to find the offset in your face, to add to event/offset . that should give the face under mouse. | |
but for a start the face-finder in %transparent-events.r is enough. i would stick with that script for a while :) | |
Anton 31-Jul-2005 [1993] | Yep. First get it working using simple one-level face-finder, then when all the events are going to the right place, merge in the deep face-finder. |
Pekr 1-Aug-2005 [1994x5] | Window Face Options part of new View doc describes 'activate-on-show option. So - does it mean my app will be activated (it will flash at taskbar or eventually brought to the front), or does it provide me with always-on-top window option? |
Is it currently possible with REBOL to have always-on-top dialog box, so I can e.g. urge user to select/enter something and will not allow him/her to go back to underneath window screen? | |
one further question re new doc - does Event Flow section image displays for you in your browser? Maybe image link is incorrect? | |
... and I tend to agree with someone (do not remember now) who submitted RAMBO bug re strange behavior of 'over function. It is imo useless (try to prove me being wrong), if 'engage has to be used instead for "over" detection, when e.g. mouse button is pressed ... because, imo, it still belongs to 'over, although it is a bit "engaged" :-) | |
maybe 'over should be dismissed altogether .... | |
DideC 1-Aug-2005 [1999] | Not always-on-top. The Window becomes active (take OS window focus) or task bar button blinks each time you 'show the window. |
Anton 2-Aug-2005 [2000x3] | The latest rotate-knob demo: |
site: select load-thru http://www.reboltech.com/index.r[folder "Anton"] clear find site %index.r load-thru/update site/gui/rotate-knob.r load-thru/update site/gui/demo-rotate-knob.r do-thru site/gui/demo-rotate-knob.r | |
(needs View1.3.1) | |
Rebolek 2-Aug-2005 [2003] | nice work Anton! I like the leverarc |
Anton 2-Aug-2005 [2004] | Thanks Kru ! See the history, I've been working on it all month. When I close my eyes I see knobs everywhere. |
Pekr 2-Aug-2005 [2005] | hmm, I copied and run above in my console and it displays message "Cannot run ...." to me ... |
Anton 2-Aug-2005 [2006] | Levelarc is nice but unfortunately shows some small but noticeable inaccuracies in agg (implementation ?). Not a showstopper and hopefully they will be fixed in good time. |
Rebolek 2-Aug-2005 [2007] | Anton, here's small idea for future improvements - leverarc should be able to change it's colour from green through yellow to red when changing value :) |
Anton 2-Aug-2005 [2008x2] | Mmm. I think I've seen that somewhere... |
I'll stick it in the ToDo list. :) | |
[unknown: 10] 2-Aug-2005 [2010x2] | Actualy it would be nice to see some final Linux 1.3 this month... Im leaking intrest currently while only Windows version is released.. Its a pitty.. |
IIm not often complaining but Im getting a bit disapointed about this.....Well anyway.. Im killing GUI time here with some alternatives...Hope RT do thier best.. | |
Pekr 3-Aug-2005 [2012x6] | We should not complain here probably, as this group has web-public flag and is web-visible :-) But, you are probably right. Rebol is meant being cross-platform. It was said SDK and other platforms will come shortly after. We all probably differ in what does "soon" mean. E.g. no single last year devcon announced technology change was delivered yet, and that is not a good signal. |
RT showed very good signal when they choosed few of community members to bring us View 1.3. But I thought things will go faster. Some kind of Rebol DLL was talked about in the past, which would bring us some parts of Rebol open sourced, to be ported faster. Now we wait for Linux "recompile" of View 1.3 for so long and noone does know why. I would expect blog article covering "What's next" and especially WHEN? | |
Although blogs are meant to be personal, being RT I would really ommit articles like "Yep ... REBOL summertime", as it shows RT in VERY bad light, being kind of one-man home company, which simply sends message like "we are on a vacation, don't expect much activity in upcoming weeks" .... | |
But maybe otoh it is better for us to know reality = there may be some slow-down, instead of thinking we will get product updates tomorrow :-) | |
Other strange factor I noticed, and correct me if my feelings about it are wrong somehow. The same way as Altme "has stolen" some life from ml, once there are some business oportunities for top rebollers (and I really wish it to all of them), community seems to be kind of dying. We can see ppl like Cyphre, Doc being almost invisible in the sense of community activity (posts to ml, or even here on altme) ... | |
... currently there is probably no single project running (well, maybe except RebGUI). Maybe it would be good if Rebol.NET would feature links to some top rebol products/projects (Maarten's bundle?) IIRC Carl mentioned it is a good idea, so maybe I could put small reminder about that in RAMBO? (if this is the right place, but I think it is ...) | |
Rebolek 3-Aug-2005 [2018x2] | a nebo rovnou trista tisic |
sorry | |
older newer | first last |