r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[View] discuss view related issues

Graham
18-Nov-2005
[3271]
we've got draw text which can follow a spline .. so why not have 
text that knows the boundary of an image object ?
Pekr
18-Nov-2005
[3272x3]
I have noticed, that there is new (dunno how long it is in rebol) 
command line parameter, called -v (noviewtop) and I have few comments. 
I am not sure that it was not added in-there because of my Rambo 
ticket, which asked for introduction of no-connect option instead. 
So, the trouble with obtrusive and annoying View desktop trying to 
connect to internet, is still there, and it really puts rebol worth 
sending into trashcan on such affected machine ;-)
Second - why ViewTop? and if ViewTop, why we still call desktop a 
Desktop? That is imo inconsistent ...
so -v might be usefull though, but - please, if we can't do proper 
async, where even system buttons are blocked and you can't even shut-down 
rebol task via ctrl, alt, del, then add noconnect option, please 
....
Volker
18-Nov-2005
[3275]
What does async in such circumstances? rebservices (should) have 
http-async, then it may be solvable easily.
Pekr
18-Nov-2005
[3276]
dunno. It does not matter. But it seems rudiculoust to see app blocked 
for 10 - 30 secs, not being able to even shut it down ...
Volker
18-Nov-2005
[3277]
AFAIK os takes that long to report an error. and with sync, rebol 
can do nothing before an os-reply.
Pekr
18-Nov-2005
[3278x2]
don't care ;-)
.... because .... OS does not take so long imo :-)) Isn't it just 
a question to set lower default time-out thant 30 sec, or what was 
the value?
Volker
18-Nov-2005
[3280]
I don't know. Thought i read somewhere something can not be influenced.
Pekr
18-Nov-2005
[3281]
IIRC rebol uses 30 secs for timeout ... :

get in make port! http://www.rebol.com'timeout
== 30
Volker
18-Nov-2005
[3282]
WHat does a normal read? also timeout for so long?
Pekr
18-Nov-2005
[3283x4]
imo, with current speed of broadbands, where dial-ups are going away, 
something like 5 secs of timeout could be enough?
trying ...
the trouble is imo with get-net-info - it is so arcane, that it can't 
be true anymore :-) IIRC there is check for old Netscape, parsing 
of prefs.js etc ...., whereas possible mozilla settings are not taken 
care of.
21 secs here for timeout:


start: now/time attempt [read http://www.rebol.com] print now/time 
- start
= 21
Volker
18-Nov-2005
[3287]
And if you change the timeout?
Allen
18-Nov-2005
[3288]
what's wrong with turn off auto-connect in the settings?
Volker
18-Nov-2005
[3289]
New users.
Pekr
18-Nov-2005
[3290x2]
the setting itself is available only after the first timeout, that's 
wrong ;-)
Volker, yes, changing system/standard/port/timout: 5  really seems 
to timeout in 5 secs ....
Allen
18-Nov-2005
[3292]
ok, but you just stated that because almost everyone is on broadband, 
that the timeout doesn't need to be as long. But if everyone is on 
broadband, they should be able to connect :-)
Volker
18-Nov-2005
[3293]
If the band is bound to a proxy, maybe not.
Pekr
18-Nov-2005
[3294]
yes, they should, but then rebol's ability to read system proxy settings 
should be fixed - I know what I talk about ;-)
Volker
18-Nov-2005
[3295]
Maybe that 5 sec is worth a rambo-ticket?
Pekr
18-Nov-2005
[3296x2]
I even wrote down the strategy during first plug-in attempt, as it 
had exactly the same problems. But it is imo lost in old World. Imo 
we could try to revise get-net-info instead?
... and yes, lowering the timeout, could make situation more acceptable 
...
Allen
18-Nov-2005
[3298]
5 seconds might not be enough time for the first time user to allow 
the user to respond to a software firewall (to add rebol to the allow 
list) and still get a connection.
Volker
18-Nov-2005
[3299x2]
Maybe a requester. "Testing proxy" and choice for seconds
if async oes not fix it.
Pekr
18-Nov-2005
[3301x3]
hmm, then get-net-info should be revised ...
Volker - or just not to connect by default, asking dialog if connect 
to internet, or first check settings ...
View already tells you, that you should do system settings, but then 
it tries to connect, which is imo incorrect aproach ...
Allen
18-Nov-2005
[3304]
I agree.
Volker
18-Nov-2005
[3305]
Me too. Needs a dialog where you can change and test.
Graham
18-Nov-2005
[3306x3]
maybe, but rebcobe binding bug is still not fixed :(((
  rambo says it is.
Ok, you View gurus ... text flow in an area field is handled at the 
View level ?
So, what's the difficulty in using a non rectangular field to flow 
text ?
Volker
18-Nov-2005
[3309]
AFAIK yes. If you mean wrap
Graham
18-Nov-2005
[3310x3]
yes, I mean wrap.
I don't recall seeing any examples where images are mixed with text, 
and where the text can wrap around the image
It's just a calculation, right?
Volker
18-Nov-2005
[3313x2]
Yes.
Which you can do yourself, and use multiple faces or draw.
Graham
18-Nov-2005
[3315]
Yes, can do oneself .. or ask for more basic support, or a new widget 
that supports this.
Volker
18-Nov-2005
[3316]
:)
Graham
18-Nov-2005
[3317x3]
scrolling an image requires changing the offsets in a pane
scrolling text, the pane stays where it is, and the text offset is 
changed
so, I guess if you have mixture of text and graphics, you have to 
scroll the pane?
Volker
18-Nov-2005
[3320]
Yes.