World: r3wp

Mmm... maybe I imagined it.... You have to admit it's a simpler face 
hierarchy though.

yeah, but when showing the face, would that affect the rest of the 
layout?

Obviously the box effect consumes the most cpu, but I think since 
the box is inside another face, it needs to be copied into its frame 
buffer.

I think the size of the face being refreshed has the most effect, 
even if two same-size faces are layered on top of eachother

Ah well, looks only about 1% faster.  I remember also Cyphre reporting 
that face refreshes speed up significantly when the offset is at 
0x0.

that's very interesting

it would be nice to know more about this to better understand how 
to optimize such things

Yes it would.  Nice effect tby the way.

thanks :-)

do http://home.wilddsl.net.au/anton/rebol/game/maze-generator.r

With enough memory you can prerender the images and simply play them. 
And after a few degrees it looks the same as before, so you can save 
a lot memory.

(was to Henrik)

Looks interesting, Henrik!

Do the standard Vid gadgets not have double click support?

well there is a way to detect a doubleclick

the second action block ... doesn't work.

no, that's for alt action, not doubleclick

what is double click?

anyway, alt click doesn't work either.

Ahh... I remember now.

I think you need to modify the feel

text-list does not have double/alt click support.

engage: func [f a e] [
					; A click event has happened.
					if a = 'down [
						; Is it on a valid element?
						if cnt > length? slf/data [exit]
						; If not extended selection, clear other selections:
						if not e/control [f/state: cnt clear picked]
						; Set selection and call the action function:
						alter picked f/text
						do :act slf f/text
					]
					if a = 'up [f/state: none]
					show pane
				]

Can I lock FIELD ? (something like field/edit?: no)

Rebolek - use label instead? uh, hard to change when layout is out 
already .... I have disable/enable functions, but it works only for 
mouse sadly, you can still tab to the field ...

Pekr: that may be enough for me, I'm using just one field, so probably 
no problem with tab.

you will have to unfocus it somehow though ...

ok, will look for the code ...

thanks

sent you an email right now - mine, not sure how actual version, 
but also found Volker's version on rebol org - I would probably better 
trust Volker's code :-)

great, I'll check it, thanks

hehe, I told you - Volker's one even disables field content for keyboard 
:-)

great, I've checked Volker's code and it's exactly what I wanted, 
thanks!

great ...

have I told you I miss such things in View by default? :-)

Probably yes, but the list of things you're missing is long, as we 
all know ;o)))

I am not sure, just .... ah, let me think .... well, it is long, 
you are right :-)

But I agree this should be part of View, specially if the code takes 
only 20 lines

hmm, but maybe we should have higher concept - kind of methods? Well, 
not once again (I was thinking about accessors and their non-fully 
developed potential) ... the most difficult part for new View will 
be - consistent look ... and the look should count in things like 
disable/enable, display the widget has focus ...

having SET-FACE being implemented consistently across all faces would 
be a big step forward.

I voted for set-face 'attribute value - much more flexible than plain 
set-face value ....

you could rewrite other methods too

rewrite in the sense of rewriting engine = override :-)

view layout [f: field tog "enabled" "disabled" [either value [feel: 
f/feel f/feel: none][f/feel: feel]]]

Better...

view layout [f: field feel [] tog "enabled" "disabled" [f/feel/detect: 
all [value func [face event][none]]]]

should request-date/date 25-Jun-2006 bring me to that day? It does 
so for the first time only, consecutive invocation fails ... submitting 
to rambo ..

ah, it is there already ....

one question - is there already a group formed for new View? I would 
like to know, where should (could) we post our requirements. I would 
not like to see some fundamental UI design mistakes repeated, so 
I want to be sure, I voiced my ideas ....

pekr, matters are being taken care of :-)

well, it is not enough. I know that Carl wants to have focused group 
for that, but there should be place, where other could place their 
requirements