World: r3wp

so no interactive console any more?

or at least not for any code that splits across 2 lines

what do you mean by interactive?  its the same but instead of being 
a separate windows app, the console is directly within the dos prompt.

but it works complety differently?

no its pretty much the same.

Sadly: <The R3 alpha uses the default Windows console. This is a 
temporary situation until the new console has been created. >
http://www.rebol.net/wiki/Notes_about_Windows_Console

>> print [
** Syntax error: missing "]" at "end-of-script"
** Near: (line 1) print [

I hadn't noticed the multi-line difficency !

So I just have to paste unformatted code only?

sunanda... for my part, I'd rather it stay there.  at least we have 
real stdio.

working in a telnet/ssh session for example, I can (in theory at 
least) use rebol remotely.

for my part, I'd rather use a rebol session as a remote shell, than 
bash.

I have to format the code in indented blocks to not lose track of 
what I am trying to do. Sorry to be so lame.

I do clipboard://

Ah that sounds like a plan

You don't even need a REBOL header anymore (I changed that).

The R3 documentation shows this example for view
view layout [
    h2 "The time is currently:"
    h3 form now
    button "Close" [unview]
]

But it does not work. Am I expecting too much from the documentation 
(sorry)    Could someone give me a graphics example that works please 
to start me off.

Sorry, I see the R3 docs are a work in progress.  I better back out 
of R3 graphics for now I think or I will get classed as a troll. 
sorry.

there are actually two sets of GUI documentation. The right one is 
located here: http://rebol.net/wiki/R3_GUI

Thanks Henrik, now I have some things that work to play with.. I 
also want to study Glayout...  AND Maxim's SSH-tool project sounds 
very interesting... Off to bed now, back to parsing tommrow I think.

I have found an example for R3 here  (about the only one I could 
spot so far)

http://rebol.net/wiki/Script_Writing_With_The_Visual_Interface_Dialect

It looks quite nice with rounded corners to the buttons too.

The example crashes when you try to exit so I suppose there is lots 
to do before this is ready for general use. I know how long developmnet 
cycles can take so I won't be holding my breath :-)    


I suspect the R2 functions built in will do more than enough for 
what I want & that I just need stick with one thing till I can understand 
it enough to know what it will do & what its limitations are. 


I showed my parsing project ot a work coleague & he suggested some 
additional data that it should colect, he was very impressed when 
I implimented his suggestion & tested it all in under 3 minutes.

I am reading about these mezzaines 3 times per day here and I still 
don't have any clue what they are... I googled but found nothing 
either.. .so what are mezzaines?

mezzanines are functions written in Rebol as opposed to C

In the Rebol console, look at the help for, for example, Foreach 
and Forall.


Under the description of Foreach, it says "FOREACH is a native value" 
- this means it is implemented directly in C in the interpreter. 
 FORALL says "FORALL is a function value" - it is written using other 
Rebol commands, and you can see the source of it using "source forall". 
 Mezzanine refers to this second type.

mezzanines vs native functions

does that mean something in English ?, because in French it does

hmm... same meaning

then all functions that I make when I program REBOL in REBOL are 
mezzanines? I thought there is something special about them

they just must have an abstract polymorphic usage

and staying small enough, i think

well, the exact definition is, all functions in Rebol which are not 
natives are mezzanines :)

But it''s Carl who makes the choice.

aha :) so it's more analog thing

Final definition:

All functions in Rebol that Carl don't want code as natives are called 
"mezzanines"

:))

Perhaps a new group "Bash Carl" should be more convenient

O don't want to be in that group :)

all functions written in rebol, *shipped with rebol* are mezzanines.

Janko: http://hmkdesign.dk/rebol/files/385cc7420409fa08f768a537a52ce4d8-76.html

thanks guys, very nice article Henrik!

very ugly link:]

That's RapidWeaver. :-)

Good short article, Henrik. The link to me is outdated. You can use 
http://john.niclasen.name/, if it's needed.

Nice article. The Google ads are funny too :)

You missed op! functions, but that is probably OK.

Hi, I am puzzling over this and would really appreciate some pointers 
please.  How do I get from this:
d1: "random1"
d2: "data2"

;;to this?
b1: [random1 ["data2"]]

so I can reference the data2 by its association with random1 e.g.
b1/random1/1

well:

b1: reduce [to-word d1 reduce [d2]]

ah, nice. Thanks.  I was looking here http://www.rebol.com/docs/core23/rebolcore-16.html#section-3.10
which for once looks like it was the right area. Thank you.

I was hoping to get something like this working with the data structure 
Henric helped me with above.
foreach bb b1 [ print b1/:bb/1]

but the foreach itterates all the vlaues, not just the words.

I have been thinking about this for a week or so, but dont really 
know how to get any further with it.


I suspect that if I had the right structure I could use it to store 
my data, then add additional details when I find some more, and finaly 
export the whole lot, grouped together by the key value (that I will 
only know when the script is running).


Im aproaching this in the right sort of way?  Or is there a recognised 
way to create these sort of structures please?

Sorry about my typing Henrik. I know how to spell your name really.