r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[I'm new] Ask any question, and a helpful person will try to answer.

jonty
16-Jun-2010
[3646]
Oh neat! (read from clipboard)
Maxim
16-Jun-2010
[3647x3]
using the up arrow, its a quick way to test multiline stuff without 
filling up the history, allowing you to go up just once, and press 
enter.
there might be some more powerfull date formatting code on rebol.org
otherwise, the picking is the way to go.
jonty
16-Jun-2010
[3650]
hmm, doesn't understand clipboard.  Is it a windows only thing?
Maxim
16-Jun-2010
[3651]
not that I know of.  what error did it give you?
jonty
16-Jun-2010
[3652]
>> do read clipboard://
** Access Error: Invalid port spec: clipboard://
** Near: do read clipboard://
Maxim
16-Jun-2010
[3653]
on what OS are you?
jonty
16-Jun-2010
[3654x3]
OSX
Rebol 2.7.6...
(Update fails as well, I know there is a newer v2)
Maxim
16-Jun-2010
[3657x3]
might be that its not working on OSX, there are quite a few OSX REBOLers 
here, one will surely pop up and confirm/infirm
latest version is here... http://www.rebol.com/download-view.html
(of REBOL/view that is)
jonty
16-Jun-2010
[3660x2]
ok, thx Maxim for all your help!
I'm outta here for now.
Maxim
16-Jun-2010
[3662]
happy to help,  the people here like helping out new REBOLers, don't 
hesitate to ask however simple you might think the question.
Gregg
16-Jun-2010
[3663]
Welcome Jonathan!


The console is your friend, but you're not the first to overwrite 
a system word and have to start a new session. REBOL has a few gotchas. 
With great power and all that. 

>> d: now/weekday
== 3
>> pick system/locale/days d
== "Wednesday"
>> system/locale/days/:d
== "Wednesday"

>> day-name: func [date [date!]] [pick system/locale/days date/weekday]
>> day-name now
== "Wednesday"
Toma
16-Jun-2010
[3664x2]
hello
umm so im kinda new to rebol, actually it was today when i decided 
to learn this language, and im thinking of making my diplome work 
in it . so i would ask some question if its alowed
Henrik
16-Jun-2010
[3666]
ah, welcome! ask away :-)
Toma
16-Jun-2010
[3667x2]
can i write programs in rebol that is abel to connect to my phone 
via cabel or bluetooth so i can read my sms and stuff like that?
so do they have functions that are abel to connect to phones or stuff 
like that?
Henrik
16-Jun-2010
[3669x2]
That depends if you have access to libraries that already do this. 
REBOL can't do this directly, but it may be possible through a DLL.
(you may want to start with some simpler stuff first)
Toma
16-Jun-2010
[3671x3]
ye sure thats what i was thinking of, but i donno if its worth to 
learn , if i cant use it for that phone thing
i thought it has some methods
i wanted to do it in java first, but then some one told me about 
this language
Henrik
16-Jun-2010
[3674]
it's probably easier for you to do it in java, if you already know 
it.
Toma
16-Jun-2010
[3675]
nop, i dont have much experience in java either, but i was thinking 
hmm phones hey then java why not
Sunanda
16-Jun-2010
[3676]
REBOL does not currently run _on_ any phones (that I know of) though 
this blog post offers some hope:
    http://www.rebol.com/cgi-bin/blog.r?view=0274


If you want to connect _to_ a phone from a REBOL-supported platform 
(Win, Lin, MAC, etc) then, as Henrik says, the crucial issue is the 
API to access the phone's functions. REBOL can probable connect to 
that API. But without more details, we'd be guessing.
Toma
16-Jun-2010
[3677x2]
thanks that was helpfull, o its actually possible to do it
probably :D
Henrik
16-Jun-2010
[3679]
I'd suggest that if you want to try REBOL, you need to figure out 
the basics first to figure out why we use it. REBOL is not a very 
popular language, but the followers are pretty loyal.
Sunanda
16-Jun-2010
[3680]
The REBOL2 external library interface (ie how you might connect to 
an API) is described here:
    http://www.rebol.com/docs/library.html
Toma
16-Jun-2010
[3681x2]
oh thank you a lot, i think there i finde some answers
i think i start tomorrow with the basics, i think i will be abel 
to do this with rebol
Sunanda
16-Jun-2010
[3683]
Good luck!
Please let us know how things are going.
Toma
16-Jun-2010
[3684]
I will, thank you again for help , by
DKnell
20-Jun-2010
[3685]
Just thought I'd wave hello in here.  I've been following the rebol 
project a while and decided to take the plunge.  I have both rebol2 
and 3 downloaded, I assume viewtop is only enable for rebol2 at the 
moment and rebol3 is cli only?
Henrik
20-Jun-2010
[3686]
welcome! and yes, correct, r3 doesn't have a desktop and won't get 
one. it will be replaced with ReBrowse, a browser-like launcher environment.
DKnell
20-Jun-2010
[3687]
interesting, i'm just wondering whether I should be experimenting 
with r2 or r3.  What do I focus on?  Sorry for this frequently asked 
question.  is there any eta on ReBrowse?
Henrik
20-Jun-2010
[3688]
no ETA on rebrowse. it will be quite a while before R3 is done. if 
you want a "complete" experience, you can focus on R2. R3 is the 
cutting edge, where development happens, but it's incomplete.
DKnell
20-Jun-2010
[3689]
Ok, I shall explore r2 fully then and keep an eye on r3 development
DKnell
21-Jun-2010
[3690]
I guess what I'm trying to avoid is spending a lot of time learning 
something in r2 which is obsolete/redundant or majorly different 
in r3.  I suppose I could try running the various r2 demos and one 
liners under r3 and learn for myself the syntax differences.
Henrik
21-Jun-2010
[3691]
It may not matter that much, but for my case that may come from years 
of using R2 and I find it easy to switch between the two. The differences 
are mainly in dialects, ports, graphics, and extensions, while the 
rest of the language is more fine tuned and more functions are available. 
Syntax differences: There are very few basic differences here.
Graham
21-Jun-2010
[3692x2]
I'd suggest also sticking to r2
R3 has been in development now for 4 years and still there is no 
beta
DKnell
21-Jun-2010
[3694]
Yes that makes sense.  It was the words i read that "r3 was a complete 
rewrite of r2" that made me question whether it was worth learning 
all parts of r2
Graham
21-Jun-2010
[3695]
There would be nothing wasted by learning r2